User talk:Cnilep/Archive/28 September 2016

DAb at Work of art (disambiguation)
I know you meant it in good faith but that has now pre-empted any discussion of where it should be, which is exactly what I asked at the RfD for it. I said right in there I doubt there is any contention that we make a DAB but where to put it. Now you put it somewhere that others may diagree with.

I have procedurally closed and marked as RfD closed as non-admin. I think you should tidy up the links I mentioned in the RfD. I am sure it is in good faith but you went in when something was listed for discussion and basically pre-empted any discussion. I am sure in good faith; the DAB we would surely have made, often we put it below the RfD listing as a draft or in Draft: space for consideration. It's my fault for not doing so myself, I guess (genuinely, I should have taken the time to do so, but was tired after looking up all the links). Si Trew (talk) 23:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I stepped on any procedural toes. Certainly I meant no offense or assertion of ownership; recently I've been working on Work and some other dabs, so I may have rushed in where you didn't want me. I'll try to make sure there are no outstanding problems, though I'm not 100% sure I know what you mean by "tidy up the thinks I mentioned." Again, I apologize. Cnilep (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Not to pile on, but I see you've pointed the redirect to the DAB. Am I wrong in thinking that it would be common to redirect to the sentence-case name, which in this case is the article Work of art rather than the DAB? Cnilep (talk) 03:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

The lady was al demonyak
While googling for information for a yet another obscure linguistic wikiarticle, I run across this paper title, and it seems to me that neither wikipedia nor wiktionary do not cover the intensifier meaning of the word "all". Is it worth of your effort to fix this? Staszek Lem (talk) 06:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Wiktionary:all defines it as "(degree) intensifier". The examples seem different from yours, but at least the definition is there. I think adding word senses to the disambiguation page might run afoul of NOTDICT purists. Cnilep (talk) 06:21, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * oops my bad. LAte night. I did look into wiktionary, but failed to notice the word "intensifier". Staszek Lem (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Speaking about disambig pages, I myself was thinking about the deletion of the dicdefish line "all, one of the English determiners" from All. Would you agree with this? Staszek Lem (talk) 20:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes. In principle, DAB should only point to articles that have, or potentially could have, the ambiguous title. Cnilep (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2016 (UTC)