User talk:Cnilep/Archive/30 May 2010

presumed unsourced material on experimental languages
I fully agree with you that all content "must comply with standards for original research, verifiability, reliable sources etc.", but I would like to point out that the content in question pre-existed elsewhere and if it is unsourced now then it was unsourced before and should have attracted your accusation then. I merely shifted what I found from one place to another and I feel that your placing the prod with that particular wording on the talk page is somewhat unfair to me.

Hpvpp (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I placed no prod. I support your creation of Experimental languages. Your tone strikes me as unduly defensive. Cnilep (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. It's just that I worry that reputation is easier lost than gained.
 * Hpvpp (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)