User talk:Cnoellec49/Undertreatment of pain

Article organization
I have some proposed changes to the structure of the article. First, I feel like it makes more sense to talk about the 'causes' before the 'affected populations'. The causes give more context and I think is more essential to understanding the topic. Second, I wonder if the 'classification' section is really necessary. I don't know if it makes the most sense to include it; perhaps the small paragraph that's there right now can move to the very beginning? Third, since the sections under the 'social, political, and cultural factors' are now focusing on different regions around the world, maybe a better header would be 'epidemiology' and I think that could be its own individual section. I'm thinking for the 'causes' section, it could be more broad and just describe the role of opiophobia, physician ideals and practices, access, education, etc, and be split into a cultural, political subsection and a medical subsection; an alternative could be at the patient level, physician level, and healthcare system level. This could be a future project for other groups to add to or if someone in the group now wants to work on getting it started, that would also be great. Just some of my ideas for now! --Amyzhou314 (talk) 23:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Overall, you all did a great job with your edits! I left some feedback in my peer review. Rani110 (talk) 21:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

I think you did a really great job adding to this page! Your contributions to the cause and the affected populations sections provide a lot of additional background and info. I was wondering if maybe the history section or the US section might benefit from an inclusion of the period in which doctors were hyper focused on pain and saw "pain as the fifth vital sign" to provide some additional context but this might be beyond the scope of your page. Overall, I thought your edits were great. Kmg121 (talk) 21:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback from PROF --
Hi --Liliput000 (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC) --Liliput000 (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow, OK you all have tremendously contributed to this page.
 * I would note that "gender" subheading seems like a cut n paste that didn't carry citations with it so keep an eye on that one
 * be sure to address your citation issues (in red) and citation 6 looks incomplete
 * stay away from words like "nevertheless" or "furthermore" to start paragraphs especially (and sentences) as they are more scholarly/argumentative than encyclopedic
 * make sure citation follows comma or period
 * Sickle Cell s'n - not sure what " [all 4]" is standing for here; but also this is a super important contribution overall; and should include a "Main article" link at the top; link to Opioid Crisis page and some others as able...
 * A note on my earlier comment on case studies, I reached out to wiki Ed folks -- I'm wondering if it might be an issue, we'll see.
 * "Causes" -- note that in the original article the first sentence of the Social, Cultural, and Political Factors subsection has a typo where "cause" should be "causes"; how do your contributions fit into what's already there in the Causes section? Are you all under the Social/Cultural/Political subheading?

New feedback from our wikipedian Ian ---
"The Pillay et al. (2014) reference is likely to cause problems since the Journal of Psychiatry is published by what's considered a predatory publisher. Otherwise, it's probably ok, although I feel like there's likely to be more recent systematic reviews on pain management (a lot of what's there is kinda old)"--Liliput000 (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)