User talk:Cnols/sandbox

Will Thompson Peer Review
-The rough draft section looks good and i believe the citations are done correctly.

- "10 different genes", talking about these 10 different genes and their importance/ relevance would be a great way to add word count in a meaningful way

- double check that you are using the citation feature from wikipedia, your references don't show up quite like mine do, but that may not be a big deal.

- The lead needs to be stronger and needs to be something that somebody with a non science background could understand.

- overall a lot of work left to be done but it looks like the sources are there for that to be easily accomplished.

CJ Ott peer review
Great start and potential references look good. Very easy to follow and interesting topic. A good way of outlining and organizing the page. Keep adding information and references and work to be done but an overall great start.

Claire Estep peer review
- Everything looks good thus far.

- Easy to read and easy to follow.

- Citations need to be hyperlinked, but as far as content, I think it is an excellent start.Acestep (talk) 23:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC) Claire