User talk:Cnslrken2

February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Michigan J. Frog, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of deaths in rock and roll. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of deaths in rock and roll was changed by Cnslrken2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883492 on 2016-02-21T22:19:20+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Phyllis Diller. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Phyllis Diller. Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Michigan J. Frog. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Block evasion by Special:Contributions/2607:FB90:47:C4DA:39C3:3B6F:ED33:7BED. Binksternet (talk) 00:18, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 01:26, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Block evasion
I have started a discussion about you at the administrator's noticeboard: Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Binksternet (talk) 06:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)