User talk:CoCaiNo

Welcome!
Hello, CoCaiNo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Lugia2453 (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Tui Laus


A tag has been placed on Tui Laus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:50, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, both because it makes no claim of importance for the company and, even ,pre important, because it was an advertisement. On the now deleted talk p. you wrote:


 * This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --CoCaiNo (talk) 19:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC) The company is still new (it started sales about a month ago), but it has interesting policy of bringing only exclusive garments and products (only 10 each month), which makes it different than most of the clothing firms out there. It is growing and I think that information about it should remain visible to those who are interested in finding more about the company. Wikipedia is an online Encyclopedia, and it helps everyone that is searching for a piece of information about something to find what he/she needs. Finding information about new companies is very hard and since wikipedia is the modern source of knowledge and information I think that this article should remain. Thank you for your time and attention.

What you are saying is that it is not yet an important company "(it started sales only a month ago)" so there's no information yet for an article. Wikipedia articles need  references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Wikipediais an encyclopedia, not a business directory. It does not and is not intended to contain every business in the world, just the ones that have already received public attention as shown by the references.

Then, the article amounted to a product description in detail, the sort of thing that belongs in an advertisement only, not an encyclopedia. A Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release or advertisement: once the company becomes notable, the article would say how it is organized & what the financial data   are, and then oncisely describe what it makes, as discussed by the sources. It would not include material that would be of interest only   prospective purchasers--that sort of content is considered promotional. No one else would care about the construction details of a garment.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know. And remember that if your organization is notable, other people will know it, and write the article. That you have to write it yourself tends to show just the opposite.  DGG ( talk ) 20:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)