User talk:CoYep

Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) will produce your name and the current date. You should always sign talk pages, but not articles. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Ann Heneghan (talk) 16:40, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Your report of 3RR violation
Your report on the 3RR violation has been followed up. Rob Church Talk 16:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Deleted images
Yeah... The images were tagged with &#123;{Cc-by-nc}} and &#123;{Cc-by-nc-sa}}. Some Creative Commons licenses are allowed on Wikipedia, but the licenses used on those images are listed on that page under "non-free Creative Commons licenses". The template itself says "If this image was uploaded after May 19, 2005, it will soon be deleted without further warning ... For the purposes of Wikipedia, this is a non-free license." Those licenses used to be allowed, but they're now considered deprecated because they do not allow commercial use, and Wikipedia eventually plans to use its content commercially. Hope that clears things up... Coffee 11:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup, that would be good. :) Coffee 12:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * You can re-upload the image with the appropriate copyright tag. And it would be good to post the email too on the image description page, or an excerpt of it, to verify that it really is under the license you say it is. :) Coffee 14:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Ok, DreadlockWoman.jpg deleted. :) Coffee 02:11, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

deeceevoice NPOV violations
Hi DreamGuy, CoYep, and SuperBleda,

If you have specific instances of deeceevoice's violation of NPOV, NOR or CITE could you post them to the deeceevoice rfc talk page? They are outside the scope of the original RfC and can't really be added at this point. Clear, indisputable violations make the best examples. It was a mistake not to include thse in the first place, if deeceevoice tones down her language but persists in content violations, little progress will have been made. -Justforasecond 18:19, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi CoYep, yes the RfC is closed, but can still be edited. Deeceevoice has not made an appearance in about a week, but if she does return with the same attitude, the diffs would be useful for an arbitration case.  My guess is that she's just laying low till things blow over but will not change her behavior.   It's up to you though.  JCarriker and Matt crypto wanted to tone things down and draft a letter to deeceevoice, which is a noble effort.  I don't know what it will accomplish, but you're certainly welcome to support that too.   -Justforasecond 16:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

deeceevoice arbitration
As a party to her RfC, you might be interested to know a request for arbitration has been filed towards deeceevoice Requests_for_arbitration.

-Justforasecond 18:27, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

replied....
.... to your query. Thanks --Oblivious 04:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Cheers!
I will have a look at prognathism and see if I can add anything! Ashley Payne 21:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I have started working at this article today... --Giorgio Fiorelli 11:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Mythical origins of language
Hey man, I seem to remember that you added some stuff to the Dreadlocks article about the Veda or Hindu mythology. I wonder if you can help me out. I'm writing an article, Mythical origins of language, and could use some help with the Hindu mythology part. If you could check it out, and the discussion on the talk page, I'd be very grateful. Thanks! :) - FrancisTyers 20:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Reverted edits on Feces
Thank you for experimenting with the page Feces on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- backburner001 18:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Oh, sorry ... I planned to remove vandalism ("For jimbo Wales, feces can provide insight to an animal's diet") - but probably due to an edit conflict (user Stollery and I edited at the same time ) I hit the wrong version. CoYep 21:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Marley bob.jpg
You need to fix the license on this image, just giving you a heads up, if its not done in a while, I'll IfD it. - FrancisTyers 14:58, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

This seems to be the license he released it under: &mdash; although how accurate that is I don't know... it seems surprising that someone who could get that close to Bob Marley and take such a good picture would release it under a license that didn't exist while Bob Marley was alive. - FrancisTyers 15:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, we should be checking, especially when downloading from a non-authorative source (i.e. Flickr). Anyone can upload there, there is no copyright checking at all it seems. - FrancisTyers 15:34, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Kinsgton Bob Marley statue.jpg would be much better. - FrancisTyers 15:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Wallace Fard Muhammad
Hi, I think we need some references for the many assertions you are adding. In one edit summary you say "According to Hazel they divorced because he was "temperamental" (p.5/p.74))". So that's p.5 and p.74 of what? Footnotes in the article need to be added. Paul B 15:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Hey Paul! Thanks for the note. It's all taken from the FBI file. Informations about their marriage are on page 5 (p.5) and Hazel's comment about divorcing Wallace because he was "temperamental" is on page 74 (p.74). I just added some more informations about his rise to power, would be great if you could NPOV/POV-review it. Thanks! CoYep 15:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

3RR and voting
Hi, CoYep. You said you cast a support vote here. I think a thing needs to be set up. You know..support and oppose, and then you add your vote to support. Know what I mean? Whis key   Rebel  lion  00:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

yes, I know that this isn't up for vote yet, the phrase I used was merely an expression of agreement, not ment to be a voting. I think we should leave it to JFS to set if up when he returns from his break. CoYep 06:20, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. Whis key   Rebel  lion  17:16, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sadhus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sadhus.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit removal
I have removed an edit from the page you mentioned. Friday (talk) 15:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Sadhus.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Sadhus.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Improper license, uploaded after 20050519 (WP:CSD)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on  explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Iamunknown 03:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Apologies.
I'm sorry about the revert to Black Supremacy. I just saw what seemed like patent nonsense in my 'popups' tool. Once again, I apologize. I didn't realize the context. Feel free to un-revert my edit. PumeleonT 03:05, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AngstEssenSeeleAuf.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AngstEssenSeeleAuf.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --12:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:LordShiva2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:LordShiva2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 22:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC) --Sdrtirs (talk) 22:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NOI Wallace Fard Muhammad.png
Thanks for uploading Image:NOI Wallace Fard Muhammad.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:BlondeDreads.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:BlondeDreads.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~  JohnnyMrNinja  22:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:BlondeDreads.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BlondeDreads.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Amalthea 03:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Fellahin Victorian-era postcard .jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fellahin Victorian-era postcard .jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sadhus.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sadhus.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)