User talk:Coast123

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of EWA Bespoke Communications
A tag has been placed on EWA Bespoke Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  19:22, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

July 2010
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ilkley. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Jorgesca (talk) 16:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Helpme
please would you be able to guide me on which part of this page is self promotional so that i can resolve this immediately. I merely wanted to be informative and not self promotional. Please see the talk page for more information. I have also made many amends/deletions today in aid of keeping the page live. I beleive the client list may have flagged a 'promotional feel' but it was not intended for that purpose. Do you think this would have caused this? When i studied at Uni - EWA were part of a large case study that we all had to conduct a lot of research for, which led me to actually contact them directly in the end... i know EWA are the topic and target of a few Uni Case studies, due to their work with some clients which we have to study such as Adidas and Ford, so i wanted to make info easier to obtain. Please provide any guidance you can, thanks very much.11003488 16:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Read WP:COMPANY and WP:RS; they should guide you through what you need to do. 930913(Congratulate) 16:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jeyes-group-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jeyes-group-logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Netcars.png
Thanks for uploading File:Netcars.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of EWA Bespoke Communications


The article EWA Bespoke Communications has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to establish notability, no reliable sources cited

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Josh Parris 10:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bimuno
Hello Coast123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bimuno for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 16:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Clasado
 * added links pointing to Substrate, University of Leuven, IBS and Digestive

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Atlas


The article New Atlas has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable company. Many refs that proves that company exists, but no refs to show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --  Darth Mike (talk) 14:25, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of New Atlas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Atlas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/New Atlas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --  Darth Mike (talk) 15:54, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest and paid editing in Wikipedia
Hi Coast123. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing, which is mostly about health and medicine. My attention was called to you by your editing about Clasado and related articles, and in general, your edits to date are promotional and ~look like~ those of a person who is a freelancing paid editor or someone who works for a digital marketing agency or the like. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Coast123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Comments and requests
Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with subjects about which you have edited, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like), and also whether you are editing for pay? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Glowing Beauty Makeover 'After' Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Glowing Beauty Makeover 'After' Photo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 09:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Glowing Beauty Makeover &#39;After&#39; Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Glowing Beauty Makeover &. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 13:20, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * You seem to represent HD Brows. You need to review WP:COI and WP:PAID(compliance with the latter is mandatory per Wikipedia's Terms of Use for company representatives/employees or other paid editors). It is a severe conflict of interest for you to be posting links to your own company as sources for article content.  To be unblocked, you will need to agree to not edit about or post links regarding HD Brows, disclose the nature of your association with HD Brows, and tell what articles or topic areas you are interested in editing as you won't be permitted to continue to edit about your company.  331dot (talk) 19:51, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * You most definitely did use the phrase "perfect for special occasions", as any admin can see. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Note.It seems not unlikely to me that we should have blocked this account a long time ago per WP:CORPNAME with respect to Coast Digital; one of their earlier edits was this one to Wiltshire Farm Foods which added the content: At the 2009 Franchise Marketing Awards Wiltshire Farm Foods was awarded the 'Best Online Marketing Award' collaborating with both Coast Digital and EWA Bespoke Communications The company talks about using Wikipedia for SEO -- see for example here.  Coast Digital appears to be a classic black hat paid editing company. Jytdog (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Ha, nice bit of sleuthing there. I was actually surprised this account had survived so long considering the obvious years of promotion from it even without your discovery, but that pretty much nails it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:06, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of HD Brows for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HD Brows is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/HD Brows until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MER-C 13:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of HD Brows


A tag has been placed on HD Brows, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Netcars


The article Netcars has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Just WP:ADVERT mainly touting a company's promotional stunt."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleted as WP:G11. The only independent reliable sources included were essentially fake in that they were not about the company. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Netcars.png


The file File:Netcars.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)