User talk:Cobra libre

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.


 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.


 * If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - UtherSRG 21:16, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello. Please provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Hyacinth 01:31, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm generally pretty good about this, but I'll keep it in mind. Thanks. Cobra libre 00:07, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Save for Dubliners?
I haven't re-read The Dalkey Archive in ages, but I thought the Joyce character said that Oliver St. John Gogarty wrote most of the stories, while he, Joyce, wrote only a bit of one, and that Gogarty needed some patsy in whose name to publish, so as to protect his reputation. I.e. the character of Joyce says that, essentially, he didn't write Dubliners, either. Am I wrong? Geogre 18:48, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Oh hell, I probably made a mistake; I don't doubt that you're correct, and my memory is faulty. I'm going to go ahead and remove my change to the article, because I'm in the office and don't have the book at hand. Cobra libre

Well, my head has been leaking a bit lately, too, so I could be wrong, but I liked the way that it was a complete reversal of the usual story about Dubliners -- that Gogarty wrote a bit of one, but it was really Joyce. Anyhow, it's not such a big deal, although I do want to get refamiliar with all the novels again soon and do a big addition. (E.g. someone has in there that At Swim-Two-Birds has nothing but recycled characters because there are too many characters in the world already. Well, in the novel, the narrator says that he has a friend who says that there are too many characters, but there is no statement that the narrator agrees or that it is his intent.  Further, I really don't know if Furriskey and the others are extant characters.  I assumed that the person who put that in knew something I didn't about Irish Westerns.  He or she may have, but, then again, may not.)  Brain leak is a common malady, and you've been doing most of the heavy lifting on the article, so put it any way you're comfortable. Geogre 04:32, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Wow, I had never heard that story about Gogarty and Dubliners. Nor did I remember the reference to that story in The Dalkey Archive, which just goes to show that I shouldn't have been making edits related to that novel!  (My self-education in things Joycean is ongoing, and was largely reinstigated after first reading Flann O'Brien a couple years ago.)  The details of At Swim-Two-Birds are becoming cloudy for me, but I think you're correct about it; I had always assumed that Jem Casey, Furriskey, et al were caricatures of types of people or characters rather than actual appropriations from existing literature... though I can't claim to have enough familiarity with Irish literature of that time to really know.  Thanks for keeping an eye on the article and for your excellent contributions! Cobra libre 22:49, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Cobra libre! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Susie Ibarra -

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of foods that sweat


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as List of foods that sweat, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of foods that sweat


The article List of foods that sweat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non notable list and seems to be more of a joke than anything else as toast does not sweat but the water vapour molecules in the hot toast condense on the cold plate, and cheese loses it moisture because of the osmosis created by the salt content. i tagged as a hoax but this was refused so here goes a PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 10:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of foods that sweat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of foods that sweat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of foods that sweat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Domdeparis (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)