User talk:Coburnpharr04/archive3

Talk page for User:Coburnpharr04 from July 2005 to February 2006.

Friendly Chat
Como estas amigo? I haven't heard from you for sometime now and I just wanted to see how's everything. You know I got to keep in touch with Mi Gente. Tony the Marine 06:11, September 10, 2005 (UTC)

Rollback
Buenas mañanas. Qué tal? On you're RFA, you said this:

"Like you point out, page protecting would be one of the tasks I would use if the case requires it. However, I would primarly patrol for vandalisms, and therefore I think it would be useful if I could revert this vandalism quickly.<> 04:59, 17 September 2005 (UTC)"

Well, there is a way to get a Rollback button without becoming an admin. Add this line:

document.write('<\/SCRIPT>');

To User:Coburnpharr04/monobook.js and you get a rollback on contributions lists and differrence pages. Hope that helps and I hope your RFA passes - you seem like a nice guy. --Celestianpower hab 07:49, 17 September 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:05-1-epicratesinornatus.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:05-1-epicratesinornatus.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use  .)  If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Zeimusu | Talk page 01:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedians/Puerto Rico page as living in or being associated with Puerto Rico. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Puerto Rico for instructions.--Rmky87 02:09, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

caps
I find that italics are a good way to call attention to specific words without caps. BTW, props for keeping Guns N' Roses vandal-free. I do the same for Good Charlotte, I know how often you have to revert stuff. DDerby (talk) 04:06, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

RFA
I'm sorry to inform you that your RFA was unsucessful and didn't meet the required level of support. You may ofcourse try again later. =Nichalp «Talk»=  07:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Re:FIliberto ojeda Article
I'll keep my eye out on this, I know that it was going to happen, you know how passionate we Puerto Ricans are about politics. I'm going out today, but if you see more POV's or vandalism let me know. I might even put the page under a temp. protection until some steam blows over. I'm sorry about the results of your adminship, but remember I'll always be in your corner. Tu amigo, Tony the Marine 22:28, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

FIliberto ojeda Article
I can't believe what all these people are doing to the Ojeda article. It looks like a circus. It looks like a disorganized mess. The vandalism is out of control. I have an idea, could you organize the article with a decent format? Then let me know and I'll protect it until the people start cooling down. Tu amigo. Tony the Marine 00:23, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

P.S. I deleted the POV image of agent Fraticelli


 * It is done! I reverted the article to your last version.  There is a possibility that another admin will unprotect it but, look it over.  Tony the Marine 03:52, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Puerto Rico
FYI, Puerto Rico is not a country, as you re-inserted into Commander in Chief (television); it is a U.S. territory. I have removed it once again. -- Seth Ilys 00:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Request
Hi Amigo, I would like you to express your opinion, which I respect so much in the talk page of Miguel Piñero. A user insists in deleting information which I believe is essencial to the article and seems to have a disrepectful atitute. Tony the Marine 22:35, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Capital punishment in the United States
I was wondering why you changed the colour of Puerto Rico on the map as it was already blue, which according to the key is the colour of states with no death penalty statute. Orange is the colour of states where it has been declared unconstitutional. Evil Monkey&#8756;Hello 23:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Image:Axl Rose - London.jpg has been listed for deletion
Your image has been orphaned and is redundant with Image:Axl Rose.jpg -Nv8200p talk 21:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

Felix Navidad


''' O.K. Carlos, so you don't believe in Santa, but I still want to wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world and the best new year ever. Your friend, Tony the Marine 04:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)'''

Happy New Year
(Feliz Año Nuevo)



'''I wish you all the happiness in the world and remember, if an injustice is ever committed against you or one of your articles, I will always be by your side. Your friend Tony the Marine'''

stop with the threats
My edits at John Kerry are a lot better than you have ever contributed there and are not vandalism. stop with the threats.

WikiProject Puerto Rico
Hola Coburn. How's it going? I wanted to invite you to become a member of the new project about our pais. If you want to, just click there and list your name where it has the list of writers on the project. As you can see, the page is poorly formatted. I don't know how to build a country-box, but we'll work on it :)

I hope I can see your name there soon! Thanks and God bless you!

Your wikifriend, Antonio Lindsay Lohan's boyfriend Martin

Thanks, and God bless you!


 * Hey Coburn:

Thanks for joining!

God bless you!

Sincerely yours, Antonio Jones Martin

Image Tagging Image:Caderon-juancarlosi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Caderon-juancarlosi.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, contact Carnildo.

Image Tagging Image:Benedict-salute.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Benedict-salute.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 10:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Did You Know, Puerto Rico?
Hey Amigo, I was thinking of adding a Did You Know? section to the article Puerto Rico. In that section we could post little known interesting facts about our island and our people. It would be serve as an educational tool that would motivate others to read about our island. An example of what I plan is this:

Did You Know?


 * 1) That the first shot fired by the United States in World Wae I was in Puerto Rico and not in Europe? It was fired by Lt. Teofilo Marxuach.


 * 1) That the first opera in history to be recorded was recorded by tenor Antonio Paoli?


 * 1) That Puerto Rico once had a President? His name was Francisco Ramirez Medina.

I want to consult with you and my other Boricua Panas. I would like to receive any input. Tu Amigo Tony the Marine 19:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Gonzaleznieves.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gonzaleznieves.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CLW 12:53, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Breyer and the First Amendment
See the case United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000) and compare the majority and Breyer's dissenting opinions. The current 1st Amd teaching is that Content Based regulation of speech -- of which moving the time it can be shown on cable based purely on its sexual content' is a perfect example -- is no constiutional unless there is a 1) compelling government interest that is directly advanced by narrowly tailored regulation that is 2.) the least restrictive means possible to achieve that end. Breyer's opinion in Playboy did not method least restrictive means but suggested a cost-benefit analysis which is inconsistent with current High Court speech jurisprudence *[]

Particularly telling is this passage startibng from page 841 "The words I have just emphasized, "similarly" and "effective," are critical. In an appropriate case they ask a judge not to apply First Amendment rules mechanically, but to decide whether, in light of the benefits and potential alternatives, the statute works speech-related harm (here to adult speech) out of proportion to the benefits that the statute seeks to provide (here, child protection). These words imply a degree of leeway, however small, for the Legislature when it chooses among possible alternatives in light of predicted comparative effects." There is no leeway or choice if the rule is least restrictive means, Breyer is making up a new rule. John wesley 20:40, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree that looking at the physical size of the SCOTUS article that putting in cases would make the article too big. But there is some mention of them tangentially in the poltical leanings section.  If so, we either have to be really short and superficial, so other non lawyers can understand, i.e. Cons Scalia and Kennedy, Moderate-Libs Breyer (or place Kennedy here), Libs Souter and Ginsburg, Out-liers Stevens (very Lib), Thomas (very Con).  Roberts and Alito may or may not be based on lower court stuff?  Or we need to flesh out what we mean by liberal or conservative.  I.e. w/r to voting rights, states rights, speech, presidential power, due process rights, substantive due process for individual rights to guns or privacy? John wesley 21:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Help
Here goes another anon how has no knowlege of how Wiki works and has posted a good article for deletion. It's about Norma Candal, please vote here: [] and help fight this injustice. Thank you Tony the Marine 04:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:St Pius X.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:St Pius X.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &mdash;Gabbe 23:50, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Scalia Photo
me registre: Rmortiz

Patriota... donde conseguiste la foto de Antonin Scalia con Hernandez Denton?

"Puerto Rico's 'Did you know?'"
Somebody nominated "Did You Know?-Puerto Rico" for deletion. You could express your opinion here: Articles for deletion/Did You Know - Puerto Rico. Thank you, Tony the Marine 01:59, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Did You Know? - Puerto Rico
Hola Amigo, while the debate on wheather the "Did You Know - Puerto Rico" article should or shouldn't be deleted goes on, I've transferred it's contents here WikiProject Puerto Rico/Did you know where it will be save and you can continue to contribute. Tu Amigo, Tony the Marine 03:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Castshot01.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Castshot01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 08:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * It's ok, go ahead and delete it.&lt;&lt;Coburn_Pharr&gt;&gt; 14:45, 28 February 2006 (UTC)