User talk:Cocainaenvenenada

Welcome
This is Cocainaenvenenada's discussion page on Wikipedia. My email: inquire@ground-magazine.com

Ezili Dantor
Page was vandalised and then restored and protected. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 11:20, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Ismael Ogando
Page was vandalised, protected and later erased. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Las Acevedo
Page was erased and then restored. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

The Weather Smells Like Oranges
Page was erased and then restored. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 11:21, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

GROUND
Page was vandalised and erased. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Article talk pages
When I unblocked you recently, I pointed out that you need to start using article talk pages. This is still the case. If you don't explain your actions on article talk pages, people will be hard pressed to distinguish your work from those of vandals. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 13:31, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, sort of new in the platform, after a long time without loging in. Now I am blocked again because a user is trolling nominating my realted articles for deletion without reason Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 13:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with GROUND. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Razer Talk 13:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from using a deletion nomination to an article with all conditions to be public, use another way of calling consensus otherwise it will be considered #Vandalism. Cocainaenvenenada (talk)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with GROUND. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 13:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Ismael Ogando for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ismael Ogando is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ismael Ogando until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Razer Talk 13:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at GROUND, you may be blocked from editing. Razer Talk 13:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Ismael Ogando. Razer Talk 13:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 13:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * You can participate in the deletion discussion if you do as I suggested above and get yourself unblocked - the discussion should be open for at least 7 days, so there should be plenty of time (even if you just sit out your block for the 31 hour duration). But you will not be unblocked early if you continue to accuse the AfD nominator of vandalism - in fact, you might even have your block extended. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * A few more things...
 * 1) There is no such thing as an "official" article on Wikipedia, and the subject of an article (or anyone connected with the subject) has no more say over its retention and content than anyone else here.
 * 2) Articles are only hosted on Wikipedia if their subject satisfies the project's notability criteria, which you can read about at WP:N. There are also some specific notability requirements for media subjects, which are described at WP:Notability (media). If an article does not demonstrate notability according to those requirements, it will be deleted.
 * 3) You must not remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:15, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * As you have again removed the declined unblock requests after having been told not to, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page for the remainder of the block. You can remove anything you want when the block expires. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Cocainaenvenenada, I hope you understand that I did not tag any pages in bad faith and I had not intention of trolling/Vandalism. Wikipedia is a community based work and every decision is taken based on consensus. Instead to throwing accusations, please participate in the AFD discussion after your block period is over. ( AFD for Ismael_Ogando and AFD for Ground ) After all we are all here to build an encyclopedia :)  Razer Talk 16:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * For whoever is reviewing this, this is obvious socking. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * And Creating sock accounts while blocked in order to accuse me and Razer2115 of vandalism will not help your cause - in fact, it might even get the block on this account extended. Now, I don't want that to happen, and I'm quite sure that Razer2115 doesn't either. All Razer2115 wants to do is establish whether GROUND meets Wikipedia's minimum notability standards, and all I want to do is get you to follow our long-standing procedures for resolving such matters, based on civil discussion and consensus. Between us, we recognize you are a newcomer to Wikipedia, and we're trying to help you understand and follow the established Wikipedia ways of doing things. I do hope that when this block expires you will take part in the discussion at Articles for deletion/GROUND, and that you will extend good faith to the other people involved rather than accusing everyone of trolling and vandalism. The latter *will not* be successful, I can promise you that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * According to Sockpuppet investigations/Cocainaenvenenada, Mockpack is unrelated, so presumably just a troll trying to stir up trouble. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:00, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your future here
Hi. You may recall I unblocked you on June 12, after you got into some problems editing Ezili Dantor. I told you then that you needed to use article talk pages to discuss your edits when there is conflict or controversy. You'd already been told that earlier by another admin. I also told you the same thing on June 24. You decided, as is your right, that the appropriate response to my suggestions was to delete them from your talk page. But you still haven't used any article talk page. Not a single time. Article talk pages is where we discuss improvements to articles and where we work out disagreements about articles. Until you're willing to do that, you won't be able to successfully work with the Wikipedia community. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 23:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC) You are edit warring to reinstate your edits promoting your magazine. You have been told that you need to discuss contested edits on the article talk page, so if that's not the approach you take in future and you continue to try to force your edits in, you will be blocked for longer. Wait for the result of the deletion discussion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * COI, socketpuppet of Discasto, constant blocking and erasing relevant information about Ismael Ogando in every language. This user is particularly interested in deleting information about Ismael Ogando in GROUND and Ezili Dantor. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 12:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * As I made the block, I can't review it. But I can revoke your talk page access because you are abusing it and wasting other people's time, and I have done so. The reviewing admin is welcome to reinstate it if they feel it is appropriate. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Talk page access revoked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Blocked sockpuppeteer
See Sockpuppet investigations/Cocainaenvenenada. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 11:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Ismael Ogando-Wolking, Prenzlauer Berg-Berlin (2017).jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ismael Ogando-Wolking, Prenzlauer Berg-Berlin (2017).jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Also:
 * File:Ismael Ogando in exile (Rigaerkiez-Friedrichshain).jpg

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
- Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 22:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)