User talk:CochraneCo

Speedy deletion nomination of Supplementaire hair system
Hello CochraneCo,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Supplementaire hair system for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. R. A. S immons Talk 13:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Supplementaire hair system
Hi, I'm Rasimmons. CochraneCo, thanks for creating Supplementaire hair system!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your username, CochraneCo, connects you directly to Cochrane and the Supplementaire system. It would probably be best if you refrained from further editing the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. S immons Talk 14:33, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Supplementaire hair system


The article Supplementaire hair system has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability and no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)