User talk:Cocolacoste

You can also [e-mail me ]

Welcome!
Hello, Cocolacoste, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! PrimeHunter (talk) 13:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Cocolacoste, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi. It looks like you may be trying to remove the Teahouse talkback template. It's above this line and says with various stuff at "...". Remove the whole thing. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the barnstar(s). I got it twice near the bottom of User talk:PrimeHunter. If you suspect you don't see the current version of a page then try to bypass your cache. You can see which edits you have made by clicking "My contributions" at the top of any page. Templates can be difficult for new users. The Teahouse talkpage template is only meant to be used by editors who answer questions and not those who post them. Its use is explained at WP:Teahouse/Teahouse_talkback. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Edit conflicts are annoying. Your work will be somewhere in a box on the edit conflict page but not saved. I usually copy-paste it to a new edit. I have posted Template:Welcome above. It has some links about Wikipedia. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:52, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Take a Break and Have Some FUN
Hi, Cocolacoste. I saw your question at the Teahouse. When I started out on Wikipedia, I found a page of Fun stuff in Pluma's adoption pages. Check it out for some ideas on building your userpage. Look at some other userpages using the Edit tab. Your friend PrimeHunter is very minimal; mine is a bit more robust; Worm TT( talk ) is pretty darn fancy. An important point: Please add language userboxs. When added, you are automagically added to a list of those skilled in languages who might be able to verify sources in languages other than English, to help editors and so on. That works even if you leave out the {{babel| and just indicate languages with {{User es-4}} if your Spanish skill is "near-native level - although it's not your first language from birth, your ability is something like that of a native speaker." Putting some other userboxes on your page will add you to lists. On my page, adding the userbox for Wikiproject Birds automagically added me as a member of that project and adding the box that says I retired from the US Army added me to Category: Military People. Reveal as little or as much as you choose; it's up to you. Take care and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER 16:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * To which you replied: Thanks a million for the kind suggestions you've made. Thing is, try as I might, I can't add any user templates to my talkpage. I hope to work this out in a no so distant future. I'm particularly interested in adding the language-related ones, since my aim on Wikipedia is just buzzing over the articles in search for typos, misspellings and tacky grammar, both in English and Spanish that is, by the way, my native tongue! PS, don't be mean and restrain from slagging poor ol' PrimeHunter -he's been a hell of a help so far. --Cocolacoste 18:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC) — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocolacoste (talk • contribs)  <-Don't forget to sign with four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ).  (A bot and some real people editors will annoy you until it becomes a habit.
 * To add a userbox, just copy the template, like {{Template:User wikiessmall}} and place it on your page while in edit mode, then click 'Preview' to see how it looks. You may have to clear your cache to see the change after saving it.  Preview accurately shows how the change will look after you save it.

{{Template:User wikiessmall}}


 * The Userbox page describes various ways to move userboxes around your page: centered or right rather than the default left margin.  I edited your userpage a bit as a demonstration although editing another person's userpage is definitely not acceptable.  I hope you don't mind.  Do edit your userpage to make it yours rather than my demo' of an easy way to line up a series of userboxes.  Hope this helps.  DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC) PS:  Reply here if you want to continue our conversation.  I'll watch your talk page for a few days.

Your signature
Hi, again. Your note in my talk page ended, "Take care, Cocolacoste 01:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC) --Cocolacoste 01:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocolacoste (talk • contribs)

I think I see the problem (but can't look inside your preferences to be sure). In your 'My preferences' under Signature, uncheck the box next to Treat the above as wiki markup. That will make Cocolacoste a nickname and the four tildes will correctly add a full signature linked to your userpage and talk page.

The full wiki-markup to make my signature is DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER. You might try experimenting with wiki-markup for your signature. Try cutting the following code and pasting it into your preferences as your signature, then check the box to use it as wiki-markup and try it out.


 * Cocolacoste Talk

That will make your signature look like this -> Cocolacoste Talk (except that the word Talk won't be as dark; the wikilink turns dark blue because the code recognizes that it is on the talk page to which the link points.)

So either create a complete wiki-markup signature with links to your page and talk page or uncheck the box. That will prevent an annoying wikibot adding any more comments when you sign your talk page entries. I hope my explanation makes sense. I've done it for so long that it's automatic to me. Take care, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ · cont) Join WER 03:28, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the kitten!
My new apt doesn't allow physical pets, so I especially appreciate the virtual variety. :) - J-Mo  Talk to Me   Email Me  21:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Contribution.
Hey, Cocolacoste. Please help contribute to my WikiProject. This WikiProject is about different cultures. If you can take some time and help contribute to it, that would be very nice of you. I am starting this project this week and would like to finish by next week. Please help me with this project. Thank you very much. Please answer on my talk page because I might not be able to keep track of who is contributing and who is not. I would like you to also share your culture. If you can give me a little summary about your culture such as, foods, lifestlye, holidays, traditions, e.t.c, that would be extremely helpful. Thank you. So if you would wish to contribute, please reply on MY talk page. Happy edits! Have a great day! Please answer on my talk page. DEIDRA C. (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Fundraising 2012/Translation/Launch email
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página Fundraising 2012/Translation/Launch email está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es alta. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es  2012-10-19.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 14:07, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Copy editing
Hello, I'm about to proofread an article (Orange (fruit)) listed in the "articles needing copy edit". Could you please tell me if there's a way to inform the team the article is being proofread? Their talk page seems to be completely out of date. Another question: do I have to put a special template or something like that after doing the revision? Apologies for all the questions -I'm a bit of a newbie. Thanks --Cocolacoste (talk) 17:20, 16 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the slow response. The propagation section has a tag that requests copyediting for that section. Once you've copyedited, you should remove the maintenance tag, and that should remove it from the category. Thanks for your interest in copyediting--God knows we need it around here. Go   Phightins  !  19:10, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Fundraising 2012/Translation/AdrianneW Appeal
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página Fundraising 2012/Translation/AdrianneW Appeal está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es media. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es 2012-10-31.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 17:14, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Fundraising 2012/Translation/Landing Page and Banner messages
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página Fundraising 2012/Translation/Landing Page and Banner messages está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es alta. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es  2012-10-26.

Update: New facts banners

___URGENT___

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 08:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: User:Steven (WMF)/PostEdit announcement
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página User:Steven (WMF)/PostEdit announcement está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es alta. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es  2012-10-25.

The translated text will be posted on village pumps, to inform users about a change they will see in the edit interface after saving an edit.

(Questions about the translation notification system can be asked at, and you can manage your subscription at .)

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 22:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/Juan Ignacio Iglesias profile
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página Wikimedia Blog/Drafts/Juan Ignacio Iglesias profile está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es media. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es 2012-10-29.

Hello friends, This is a translation of a profile for the Wikimedia Foundation blog of Juan Ignacio Iglesias of Argentina.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 23:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Notificación de traducción: Fundraising 2012/Translation/Poongothai Appeal
Hola Cocolacoste,

Estás recibiendo esta notificación porque te inscribiste como traductor de Meta en español.

La página Fundraising 2012/Translation/Poongothai Appeal está disponible para su traducción. Puedes traducirla aquí:
 * traducir al español

La prioridad de esta página es media. La fecha límite para la traducción de esta página es 2012-10-31.

Agradecemos enormemente tu ayuda. Traductores como tú hacen que Meta funcione como una verdadera comunidad multilingüe. ¡Gracias!

Los coordinadores de traducción de Meta&lrm;, 14:52, 25 October 2012 (UTC)


 * ✅. I've also corrected some minor slip-ups in the previous version (first four paragraphs). Still, the appeal could do with a revision since it is too literal a translation.
 * Regards


 * Perdón, no me di cuenta de que el mensaje estaba en castellano. Terminé de traducir y corregí algunos errores mínimos en la versión que había −los cuatro primeros párrafos−. Aún así, no le vendría nada mal una revisión: es una traducción demasiado literal.
 * Saludos,
 * --Cocolacoste (talk) 16:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

The Queen of Cans and Jars
hey Patrick Kavanagh and his bench. Ceoil (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh my! What a beautiful song! Didn't even know that band existed, philistine me.
 * As a reward, these  are two of my favourite songs ever and this  – agnostic though I am – gives me goose pimples. You prolly know them already, but still... enjoy!
 * Come here till I tell you something, you feckin' eejit: you is a dote (By the way, how's my Irish, eh? Half decent? Abyssmal?
 * Cheers!--Cocolacoste (talk) 23:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Next time you are hanging out in Camdem Town bemoaning the current state of todays music whith some hotties, now you can say "of course I've not been impressed with Guided by Voices since their "The Queen of Cans and Jars", and even that was a rip off of their own "My Valuable Hunting Knife"." Chicks love that shit. (As you well know, being one yourself). Ceoil (talk) 23:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Re link above, tks, and & . Braces. Ceoil (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Tsk about what? You're as clear as mud, my friend. Is it Handel you don't like? Or good ol' Tom? Either way, tut tut indeedy.
 * I'm fairly certain you'll like this.. War, whats that all about eh ;) Another view is this[, which Im certain you'll hate. Its daft yeah, but listen to the drummer, and what a riff, the heavosity of it all. Metal is always best when its slower.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtnG6EHh1N4] [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Nopes, PJ certainly not my cuppa. One or two songs, fine, but bores me shitless afterwards.
 * 2) Holy crap on a cracker! My ears, my ears! To think I saw them when they were the support act at a Paralamas concert, mind you, I was young at that time *sighs*. T'other chaps with the weird name are spookily interesting, I must say.
 * ps, your irish is abyssmal. You have the words, but not the hang of venucalar. TK does a good parody when the mood takes her, but not you, unless your being deliberatly cartoonish. That would be odd, even for a troll. Stil though, I would have though a Scott would do better, we are very simiar nations after all, though the irish have a slight edge.  Langer. Ceoil (talk) 14:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Trust you to slag me off, sunshine! You defo have it in for me, an innocent, pure, dainty maiden. I know my Irish is atrocious, you prick. In my defence, though, I was (badly) hamming it up, yeah. Oh, and I'll do a Pontius Pilatus and say I've been initiated in the Gaeilge lingo by a countrywoman of yours... who's been living in Laaandaan for the last twenty years... the treacherous cow.
 * Scot?! Scot?! Scot schmot. Keep on like that and I'll tell you what part of my anatomy is Scottish. Just you wait, petal. --Cocolacoste (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Horrible Histories
Thankyou for all your hard work on that article. I'm very sorry I reverted your edit, but as I said in the edit summary, I was in the process of dumping all the relevant information into the article. Now that I have finished, I think the article as a whole would greatly appreciate a copyedit from you. I know you have already done bits and pieces, but yeah, if you want to tackle the major paragraphs, then go ahead. Obviously there is still a lot more work to be done (and lots more sources to draw information from), but considering I was able to get so much information from just 1 source, I think we should copyedit what we've got before we start to add some more.--Coin945 (talk) 17:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries, chum. The problem with reverting, though, is that another contributor had to step in to make just about the same corrections I'd already made – regarding typos and repetition of words. It's always best to check the changes and re-edit. As I had a hunch you'd got a bit miffed, however, I've been staying clear of the info you added.
 * You've certainly done an amazing job there. Can't deal with it right now as I'm up to my neck with real-life work and with another article I was asked to copy-edit –and that article's the stuff of nightmares, I tell you. Working on HH is sorta an escapism from it. I'm just focussing on the easiest stuff, the episode list, which is a flagrant copy'n'paste from this . If you wanna chip in that, you're more than welcome! (especially series 2: I hardly remember what that was about, jeez).
 * From a cursory look, some random thoughts about your stuff:


 * All these
 * Conception and relationship with book series
 * Writing and shooting
 * Music
 * Casting, characters and costuming

should fall into the "production" category, while "Historical accuracy" and "Popularity and legacy" should be two different headlines, to comply with the Manual of Style on layout and, more importantly, to make the article better organized.
 * There are way too many quotations and, ya know, Wikipedia tends to pick everyone on this. Lemme know what you make of this and I'll start working on that in a couple of days.
 * I totes agree with you moving the list of episodes to another page: it makes the article less unwieldy. The only snag is no summary paragraph is there so the article can get yet another bloody template, just like Lewis (see here: Lewis (TV series)). I'm gonna moving it back –hope you won't mind!
 * Again, totes agree with no stuffing more sources into HH, we've already got an awful lot of them.
 * Let's keep pulling together, yeah?
 * Hope you're splendidly well. Cheers!--Cocolacoste (talk) 23:39, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, soz for the tardy reply but, as I've said, I'm a bit pushed for time at the mo.

A barnstar for you!

 * Also what do you think of Poor Folk? Regards.--Tomcat (7) 23:46, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Why, thanks ever so much! And no worries: we all get cross sometimes.
 * This means we can keep working together?
 * I'm tackling another article at the mo, but I'll have a squint at Poor Folk soon-ish
 * Cheers!--Cocolacoste (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Horrible Hitories at BAFTA 2011.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Horrible Hitories at BAFTA 2011.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Horrible Histories BAFTA win 2011smaller.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Horrible Histories BAFTA win 2011smaller.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

The Rushin writer thingy
Hello Cocolacoste. I watched in admiration as you worked through Dostoyevsky. Thank you for sticking with it and doing such good work there. Would I be correct in thinking that it's done now and that I might archive the GOCE request? Regards, --Stfg (talk) 21:59, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
 * My goodness, my gracious, my me! That's very kind of you to say, Stfg. *blushes all over*.
 * As for archiving it, I'm not quite sure: information about the "French" school differs from what two sources say*, as is the case of his bruv being rejected from the academy. Is asking for a teensy bit of more time too much? Couldn't finish good ol' Fyodor as I'm also tackling with Orange (fruit) at the mo for the November drive. And that is one thorny article. Anyway, it's not for me to decide what should be done with D F. Do what you think best, goes without saying.


 * Regards,--Cocolacoste (talk) 22:28, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * (*) Mainly, it wasn't a boarding school and they didn't teach everything in French. And Mikhail wasn't admitted simply for health issues, there's nowt about his learning skills in the sources.


 * Oh, you can have all the time you want, teensy or hugesy! I thought to check, but it's your decision when to consider it done, not mine. All best, --Stfg (talk) 23:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. To be honest, I'm a trifle ashamed that hammer thingy's still at GOCE but, at the same time, can't help being a fastidiously fusspot of a human when it comes to grammar and stuff – not in the "grammar pedant" style, though, give me descriptivism any day – so I'll ludicrously mull over every puny detail. I'm anything but efficient... will finish F D off asap, promise.
 * Laters,--Cocolacoste (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Perhaps that's why you end up with nice sentences. And if you prescribe the descriptive and proscribe the prescriptive, that's OK by me. But it all depends what the descriptive choose to describe doesn't it? And the prescriptive have to describe what they prescribe and what they proscribe, don't they, so doesn't it come to about the same? Anyhow, what I really came to say is that if you think thems is hammers, I'm not gonna lend you my chainsaw! Sorry. --Stfg (talk) 20:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Nah, I like come up with like nice sentences* cuz I'm like well cultured, me. *I don't.
 * You, Sire, is savant and funny. You talk like the eggy, which makes me chortle but also feel rather mimsy. If I'm allowed to emanate some twaddle, though, lemme say that hardly ever do prescriptivists describe −a rule is a rule is a rule is a rule. Part of me is hideously prescriptivist, mind you, only that my knickers aren't twisty about misspellings, apostrophes and such.
 * Oops, I've really screwed* it up. Your spot on: dat ain't a hammer but a screwdriver and a whatsit. Drat my ignorance, I could use your chainsaw for some chores I gotta do. *Pathetic joke. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  06:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Ooh, Ma'am, you appear to have turned a delicate shade of green. Might one venture to suggest that a wise wikifairy could do well to eschew the green one → for a day or two? And chainsaws? Much better to continue copy editing Orange and see if you can find some mots juiced.

Your emanation was not in the least twaddlesome. Me, any prefix I might once have had fell off years ago, and now I'm just a scriptivist: I hope one day to learn to write well enough that the meaning comes through crystal clear and the writing doesn't draw attention to itself at all. Truth to tell, I lean a little toward prescriptivism, not because of any contortion of the aforementioned hosiery, but just because there's so much complete codswallop out there and telling rules is probably a quicker way to get improvement than any other. Keep well. --Stfg (talk) 20:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * This boozy busy wikifaerie heartily swigged la fée verte (hic!) so as to imbiber the culture of the cultivars as if in a trance. Alas, neither the Green Muse and her pals nor Monsieur Gustave came to her rescue and now she's tied herself up in knots, and not just any old knot. Only a lemon could've chosen to trim that foliaceous jungle of words, which has just proved that it ain't easy-peasy to squeeze the orange and also turned this adorable* wikifaerie into a right miserable prune. (*As if!).
 * I heart this ("the writing doesn't draw attention to itself at all"), Sire, and couldn't agree more. It's worth a crack – as they say oop North – in the future.
 * There certainly is regurgitated piffle 'ere and there. Still, I stubbornly refuse to embrace the prescriptithingy for quick it may be but deep, mmh, mmh. Hope this won't miff you.
 * Hope you is splendidly well. I'll bore you no more. À bientôt -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, Pass that lovely chainsaw of yours, would you? Seems the only way to clankingly tackle with that hellacious article – oh, and the aforesaid knots.
 * PS2, Compulsive meddler me couldn't help noticing the penultimate change on your talk page and, lo and behold!, seems we've got a charming mutual friend. Who'da thought Wikiland was a small world?

Copy-edit of Fyodor_Dostoyevsky
Hi, Cocolacoste, I hope I'm not bothering you if you're busy in rl, but are you still copy-editing Fyodor_Dostoyevsky per your comments here? Your last edit was on the 13th of November, and it's now reached the top of the pile. Please don't think I'm being pushy, just asking of your intentions so the list can be updated.:-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, Baffle gab1978, I'm aware (see start of previous section). Cocolacoste, I'd like to archive it today (30th) so that we can clear the October requests before the end of the month, but this obviously doesn't preclude you continuing to work on the article for as long as you judge needful. Is that all right? --Stfg (talk) 00:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Baffle gab1978, No worries, you're neither pushy nor a bother. Quite the contrary, it's me who should apologise left, right and centre for being so slow. Yup, I plan to continue with D F, but update the list. Apologies all round again. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Course it's all right to archive it. I shall give that article the final tweaks once I've finished the citrus thingy off. As I've said to Baffle gab1978, apologies for the trouble I've caused. Plus, didn't know about the procedures at GOCE regarding archives and updates. Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, Novice me seems to have a tendency to choose intricate articles to copy-edit. Tsk.


 * Thanks, but please don't apologise or criticise yourself -- there's no cause. Yes, you do seem to find some toughies, but you're a very good writer and you help wikipedia by tackling them. I'll archive the request today, but please just continue as you've been doing. Best, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I added a bit more content. Please voice your opinion. Is "The steppe-like region with the many mosques conveyed him an unknown picture of the life outside of European Russia. " understandable? Regards.--Tomcat (7) 22:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, saw the changes today by chance: Wiki's weird and I get emails when DF is modified by anonymous users but not by you.
 * Hmm, sounds a trifle twisty, that sentence. I don't quite get what sense of "convey" is being used – plus, you convey something, not someone. "Made him think of"?, "reminded him of" (unlikely, innit?)?, "he got an idea of what life outside Russia would be like"? Cross the the before mosques out.
 * Not to be a a hoity-toity cow, but
 * I've noticed you changed the verbs in captions to past tense. They should go in the present: they're describing the image.
 * The last user was pulling your leg. "The members were brought to the well-defended Peter and Paul Fortress, which occupied the most dangerous convicts" doesn't make sense. It shoulda been "was occupied by" or, perhaps better, "where the most dangerous convicts were sent" or something like that.
 * "Outside of" is more US than British English –unless you mean apart from. And DF is in BrE.
 * Please, don't think I'm lecturing you, eh? Just giving my opinion.
 * Bit busy at the moment but shall return to DF soon-ish.
 * Best, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:14, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your most gracious reply, Cocolacoste, I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier, been doing RL stuff.:-) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. I changed the tense because "Dostoyevsky is the third in the second row; next to him stand Pleshcheyev and Durov." may mean that you directly describe the picture (but on the picture we don't see Dostoyevsky, Pleshcheyev and Durov).--Tomcat (7) 12:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

van Eyck
You can tell me to get bent if you want, but I have an article that might be ready for FAC before christmass if it were not for my abysimal writing and constitutional inability to spell. I need a good copyeditor. Your a good copyeditor, so here I am, on my knees, redacting all the horrible things I said about you, your friends, family and pets in the past. Best either way. Ceoil (talk) 22:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Holy crap faeces! The return of the prodigal rapscallion? Out of interest, 'course, cuz he couldn't be arsed bothered to get back to me before. Pscht.
 * By the way, howz you, hideous lovely thing? –see? I'm well nice and polite, myself.
 * Seriously, now. It'll be a pleasure to copy-edit dat –and really flattered by your request. Only snag is I'll be up to my tits breasts with exams till the 21st, and free afterwards, so I'll prolly be working on the Madonna a bit slowly. That allright? What's the deadline?
 * Laters,-- Coco Lacoste  talk  23:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, Yup, go bent and on yer knees, like yer pal.
 * No deadlines, my racist Scottish friend. Whenever you get a chance, but I have to warn you petal, the prose are in such a state, even by paddy standards, that you might need gloves and a mask. I presume your rough and tough enough for such a task? No problem if you too sensitive and not, I go ask somebody from England. Ceoil (talk) 00:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, now I'm a racist and homophobic? As per usual, that queer paddy's talking out of his sodomised arse.
 * As me ain't a Scot or a Sassenach, I couln't care less, to put it mildly.
 * I'm after having a squint (improving my Irish, eh?) at yer article: it ain't that bad, my pretty, compared with other poisonous crap I've been dealing with. Ye know wot I'm talking about. Oh, and the sodding Orange fruit I had the brilliant idea to copy-edit. I'm nothing if not wise.
 * Now, you, listen, I'll probably be pestering you with questions* re the Madonna doodle – stoopid joke, I luv me some van Eyck. You don't mind?
 * (*) 'Dis, for example: "Une autre tableaul de Nostre-Dame, du duc Philippe, qui est venu de Maillardet, couvert de satin brouché gris et ayant fermaulx d'argent doré et bordé de velours vert. Fait de la main Johannes." You copied and pasted that quote and it's in old French? Cuz if it's modern French, it's proper dire.
 * Yours unfaithfully, you mickey. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yomanagi already toasted me on that one...took it from one of the other language wikis. I did lean French inschool, but didnt pay much attention, too bust sticking compasses in the arms of my classmates. It was late and I was young and crazy.. The article is about 80% there re content, but is a bit confused in places, which is where you come in, in your guilded magnifincance and fabulouness. Ceoil (talk) 01:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, poor thing, you! That lass/lad is a meany. You lean French? Cor, that phrase evokes soooo much in my filthy mind. What other wikis? It's only in the Polish and Italian ones, with articles this short. Oh, and summat that looks like Japanese, but I won't venture there. Some words can be Middle or Old French (ie "Nostre"), though I'm lost re others.
 * I know it's about content, knobhead. But spelling, even in the froggish lingo, also counts for a FAC, no?
 * Don't overdo the arse-licking, darling, it'll lead you nowhere. Don't mess with me. I'm ruthless -- Coco Lacoste   talk  01:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Can I pay you in links to sort oout my horrible English, not to mind French. I suck, I admit it. What do you want, blood? . Ceoil (talk) 01:52, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll get that French sorted, just you wait. You don't suck, nincompoop, your article's mint. I wish I could write half-decently, or as I used to, at least (suffering from sorta writer's block, even if I'm no writer).
 * Nah, no need to pay me. I'm here just for the love. But pliz refrain from sending me dreadful links, yeah? Newfangled music make me want to sick up. I'm not one of those arty-farty types. Ta, Moi. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  02:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * PS,Come to think of it, some Irish lessons would do nicely.
 * I can do that. Lesson numer one, if a person annoys the fuck out of you but merely is dim and contemptable, they are a *spanner*, if there are some signs of reason they are a *langer*, if they are knowingly and wantingly agressivly a prick you might want to wish that they "marry a wench that blows wind like a stone from a sling". Not in gaelic, sure, I'm building up to that as I know your an innocent auld dote. Ceoil (talk) 02:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Sweet! Keep 'em coming, man! and don't spare my feelings. Spanner and the phrase go straight to my book. Already knew langer, so bah. Finally managed to get what you meant by that mega-cringe link, after reading the summary edit, which I never do, so better spill all the beans here. And good bye, gent. I'm supposed to be finishing off that bleeding Orange article. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  03:02, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * k babes. Laters! Ceoil (talk) 03:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * - Oops, did I ec you? Ceoil (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you prick. See yer talk. For arse's sake. What a day!

-- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:09, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Langer even, holds head in hands. Can you copy across your sandbox version; I'll note the diffs to the changes I mage tonight, very easily done, and reinstate where necess at some stage over the weekend, but they were all fairly trivial anyway, mostly cut and paste restructuring. My bad. Ceoil (talk) 00:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Cocolacoste, Have done the merge and am working to the inlines left by both yourself and Riggr. I need to reorder a lot of the description section, ye poked a few holes in it ye bastards, so need time for that, and I have a few fiddlig bits and pieces to add. I might take it for tonight, after which, I hope you'll revisit, if your not too put off by the edit conflict last night. Bestest. Ceoil (talk) 23:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)


 * My darling C,
 * First off, thanks a million for doing the merge – been out all day, couldn't do it myself despite my intentions.
 * Yup, I saw you were working on t'article so I decided not to stick my bloody nose into it. While you'are at it, be careful w/ word order here: "A small statue of the Virgin and child is seen behind the main figures, positioned in a choir screen, between two lit candles". If you put the bold text at the end, it may be confusing 'cause it could be interpreted as if the main figures were the ones in the choir screen, which obvs is not the case. Plus, it isn't quite clear what is between the lit candles (the choir or the statue) and, IMHO, "positioned" makes the prose a trifle verbose and could be left out – sorry if I'm being a pain in the arse. Just don't wanna change it myself without telling you first. Vile and vicious as I might seem, I'm all for dialogue and collaborative work.
 * You delectable silly sausage! Why would I get miffed* at a stoopid e/c? That was the Clash of the Titans, that was. *I'm fuming, eejit (nah, joking).
 * Completely unrelated, but this just turned out to be the weirdest of weirdest coincidences: since we started to chat on Wikiland, I've always pictured you (dunno why) like this chap →


 * Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:26, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You seemed to have run out of cigs yesterday, a fate worse than death in my experience. Its only cigs, coffee and fear keep me going, and can imagine how miffed you were when they were absent and you had to deal with my thoughlessness. Anyhow, delighted you are still on board, and fixed my, haha, handeling of middle French. The dating sect is an unmitigated fucking disaster bty, so when you are steering the reigns again, stay well away, least you become indirectly tainted by my, uh; "confusion" is the nicest word. Ceoil (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * By "ran out" I meant "only 5 left". Had I really run out of my Parisiennes, I'da walked the eight blocks to the only corner shop open after 9 pm in my blessed neighbourhood. Oh, as for coffee, I simply can't do without it.
 * Of course I'm still on board, and fucking stubbornly determined to continue, just to piss you off and annoy the shit outta your soul. Truth to tell, I find it very amusing and interesting to copy-edit yer article.
 * Oi, what are the Latin words you're looking for? The version of "For she is more beautiful than the sun, and excels every constellation of the stars. Compared with the light she is found to be superior"? 1)If so, I've just found the bastards, which is ace, since they're not proper Latin, but Ecclesiastical Latin. This explains why the "sol" in Mary's robe is a fragment of the word – in Class. Latin, sol is... well, sol. This was one of the many questions yours truly had for you. 2) If not so, could you please be more specific in the talk page? -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Of course thats what I meant, and have been wondering if my some of my sources are a of the €5 in a pub car park variety, that they dont provide the origional script. Frankly, Im seeing a lot of holes, might have to a beg borrow and steal or troll my way towards some JSTOR articles. Your in confusion. Ceoil (talk) 02:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Butting in for a moment (despite the wikibreak tag and all). Cocalocoste, Ceoil gives me no respect! As though I hadn't checked for sources for him! Seriously. Oh and so happy to meet someone else who, like me, lives on coffee and well, those other things. Anyway, back later. Carry on. Laters. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Truths! long time no see! Didn't even know you were wikibreaking! Hope everything's fine and dandy with you. Don't worry about Ceoil: we all know he's nowt but an ungrateful scamp. Yay! Great minds drink and consume alike, so to speak. There's also cheese on my top 5.
 * You, the Irish sunshine, go check the Madonna talk page (your wish, Sire, is my command). The article needs working, sure, but is good. A bit patchy at times, though not so many holes in it, unless you is looking at... (oh, no, no, Coco. For civility's sake, don't say that! You're a law-abiding wikispecimen). What on arse's name are JSTOR articles? Don't quite get you.
 * -- Coco Lacoste  talk  03:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm fine, thanks for asking. I see you have a new sig, and can turn the page green - that's more than I can do. Cheese? Hmm, depends on the type. None of that bland stuff for me. I like it sharp and tasty. Anyway, off for the night, but nice to see you working on the Virgin. Take care. Truthkeeper (talk) 03:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

GOCE November 2012 drive barnstar)

 * Thank you, Stfg, but "Orange" isn't finished yet. I mean, I thought it was more or less decent and tried to put it on the Drive page last Friday, only that Cinderella-me didn't realise it was 0:09. Then I reread the article and found it was brimming with slip-ups – especially the Etymology subsection. I'll try to wrap it up between today and tomorrow and leave an explanatory message at GOCE's talk page. (I've failed to meet a deadline yet again. Apologies to you and the rest of the Guild). Best, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  15:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I know it isn't finished yet, but you're very diligent, and I wasn't going to let you go completely unrewarded. Apologies and explanations aren't needed. Don't go putting that exam at risk just for the sakes of Wikipedia, will ya. --Stfg (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Cheers, S. It's very kind of you and really means a lot.
 * God almighty! You said exams, ergo, you've read the chat above this. Full of fescennine, scurrilous, irreproducible words. Ashamed though I feel, I won't apologise. That's me all over, a mouth from the gutter.
 * Wha'? Wikipedia is the perfectest excuse for not doing what I gotta do.
 * Laters, Coco Lacoste   talk  17:54, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, there's too much fun going on here, I'm getting addicted, can't get it off my watchlist, it just creeps back on while I'm not looking! Yay, a new word today! Fescennine indeed! Wow! --Stfg (talk) 18:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ha, ha... well yours is on my watchlist too, so chuffed to see you'll be back next January.
 * Relieved to know you're not galumphing alongside those marauding hordes of prudish fuddy-duddies who will chastise us sweary types for our impudence
 * As for the new word, here are its deliciously bawdy origins: Fescennine Verses – quite piss-poor article, mind, but this (Dionysia) complements it nicely.
 * It's been a pleasure to run into you. Best of luck with your real-life projects. Me -- Coco Lacoste  talk  21:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

van Eyck II
Cocolacoste, we need more descriptors for light, the article is veering towards cliche: spills, illuminates. I only know so may words with more than 6 letters. Ceoil (talk) 14:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Yup, deffo. Been thinking about this: synonyms is wot we need. By the way, "It brilliantly illuminates the interior blah, blah" in the intro has been haunting me. Garish and manky, if you'll excuse me.
 * Thing is, contrary to my unmerciful nature*, I'm walking on eggshells on that article, mainly cuz I'm not well up in the subject and so afraid of ballsing things up. I need to become more acquainted with the topic first to muster up some courage and slash the written stuff. That's why I depend on your knowledge, seriously. *Have a look at what I've inflicted on Orange (fruit) to get an idea of what I mean.
 * But we'll eventually pull this off, worry not. We've become sort of brethren – yeah, I saw the word you deleted, you caitiff arse.
 * Talking of light and walking, here, enjoy this precious gem:
 * Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  15:33, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Can top that, though tese guys are obviously taking the piss. hey, its fun working with you and there is no hurry and rush, so I'd say trust your instincicts re wording. Whats the worst that could happen? We are all going to die anyway. Gut the into at will. Ceoil (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you see the size of your copyediting task grew by a third! Dont worry through, Johnbod is a much better writer than I am, so there will be less untangling. I'm still working through your inlines, they are very helpful, but may take the rest of the evening at least to go through. After than, and when JB is happy, I might just leave the page for you to touch up. I have to say, this article has restored my faith in collaborative editing, its been a breath of fresh air to be able to bounce off people like this. Ceoil (talk) 23:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Yup, been keeping an eye on it. Sterling work indeed, and fantastically complements your also sterling deeds. To think I hidden his first edit!¨*looks around for a sturdy rope*.
 * Will get back tomorrow to t'article: haven't slept a blink (again) and I'm dangerously likely to ruin everything. If my memory serves my fried brain well, I've left somewhere – talk or inlines, can't remember – summat about the lettering on Our Lady's robe. It'd be great if you could answer, 'cause the rewriting of the Latin stuff is in yer dexterous hands.
 * Chuffed to hear your faith's been restored. As you know, I'm a miserable newbie so don't know much about this jungle. Never thought I would interact with others here until I bumped into you and TK in not the most pleasant of circumstances (he, he, I'm evil, me) and with another gent at the GOCE project afterwards. But, bloody hell, yes, working with others is sooo much fun and rewarding.
 * Laters, delectable bugger.
 * Yours sleepy and all fucked up, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:14, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Strangest thing about this place - sometime not the most pleasant circumstances become, well, more pleasant. I was very happy to bump into you and when you're done w/ my friend Ceoil, your brain less fried, and mine too, I'll probably be sending some work your way as well. But not until after the so-called holidays. Truthkeeper (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Same here, Truths. Thrilled to bits at having youse both popping by, and utterly baffled by your lovely plans to work with me.
 * That's what life is about, I suppose. Full of unpredictable, enigmatic coincidences.
 * At this very moment, perhaps, you, Ceoil and I are lighting up ciggie. I like the idea of different people in different places doing the same thing at the same moment. And that simple, trivial act – I think – brings them somehow together... Oh, good Lord in heaven, I'm just raving deliriously... better shut my gob.
 * Tuck in, darling. Much love, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Had just lit up when I saw this on my watchlist (there is a pun there that Im not going to touch, esp considering the light descriptors we were bitching about above). And opened a white, so cheers from a fool of an Irishman. Ceoil (talk) 01:32, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Yay!!! At least something decent, nay, great, posted by you, evil monster. I luv me some Pogues.
 * Never, ever mention light, ok? Not for today.
 * Since you had the temerity to change the heading, be an angel and tidy up this sodding mess, will ya? – I mean, can you move down my one and only pointy thingy?
 * Fuck, been arsing around all day and done sod all.
 * Ah, you know, screw you; I've been posting great links all this time, your just too bloody ignorant and dainty to appreciate. Ceoil (talk) 15:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Ignorant, granted. Dainty, my arse. Anyway, I stand corrected. That was too wild an accusation: not everything was tripe, just those ubergringe-y videos suitable only for heavy metal cranks. Each to their own, mind, as my nan would say. Can't be arsed to squabble over this. There you go, enjoy this crap.
 * Ta for fixing the pics yesterday.
 * You working on the Madonna right now, or can I get moving? By the way, I wants that Pächt thingy. Could you drop it somewhere?
 * Screw you too. Love and kisses, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  00:47, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Answering for my absent and rude friend: there's nothing in the Pacht thingy for the Madonna (I already checked - though no one asked me). I've ordered the book from the university library. If he covers this painting, when it arrives will post notes as soon as I have time. I have another source with quite a lot, particularly the original Latin, but y'all will have to do without my wonderful self for the next 10 days or so. Will get to it when I get to it. Truthkeeper (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Page is all yours Cocolacoste, do your worst and fire at will at my horrible descs of light. No mercy! Ceoil (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * TK, Trust our mutual friend to tell porkies. Pfft. Thanks and no problemo, take your time. (Particularly interested in the Latin thingy now. That part needs serious rewriting).
 * Next time I'll ask you, I swear on all things holy.


 * Page is all yours Cocolacoste, do your worst :) Ceoil (talk) 01:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Annoying leprechaun, You're taking the piss outta me, right? Can't even write on my talk, if you please, without your disgusting self clashing with me.
 * Thanks for the compliments, very honoured. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Im confused; am I actually typing the same shit over and over, or are you darling, refractoring my posts. Pls explain, as if Im actually senile now, its some thing I should be aware of and its probably best I make arrangements:) Im 83 you know, and onoly just coming to terms with electricity. Ceoil (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, you fucking are. Didn't you arsing see what just happened sodding again? This is beyond of fucking beyond.
 * On second thoughts, however, yours is an unusual yet enthralling idea: my subconscious might be rejecting your opinions and this whole hullabaloo's got nothing whatsoever to do with you being a nuisance. So stay calm, my dearest friend, watch that woeful tosh my noble, generous soul has post for you and go to sleep. (It's beddy-bies for elderly geezers).
 * I'd better bugger off to the article. Wikipedia is not a forum yada yada yada. Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  02:10, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Electricity is easy: you just have to insert your fingers in a socket, and voila!
 * C my love, your subconscious is the last plcae on earth i'd put time aside to disentangle. Im sure your brain is lovely and all, wonderfully complicated, but to understand you would take severasl hundred monkies working on several hundred type writers...or something, I forget exacly what I meant to say. Feeling confused, maybe I am...83 and its not all just a dream. I fought that nice man, mr hitler you know. He liked me. Ceoil (talk) 02:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

More Dostoyevski
Hi CL, I just noticed this deletion discussion. I completely missed notification or anything, otherwise would have chimed in (well, maybe) but thought I'd give you an FYI in case a bunch of more is added to the main D. article. Not sure how I feel about it as I haven't read the "Themes" article - but anyway a head's up. I hope you haven't given up completely there, despite the work on the Madonna. Truthkeeper (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh dear, oh dear. Thanks for the tip-off – I didn't get any notification about this. Wasn't aware of the merge either – my wikimail is a bit temperamental: even though DF is on my watch, I don't get emails every time it gets modified. Anyway, I've been in two minds about coming back to DF, but after this I'm afraid I won't – with certain editors spewing out their usual vile bile there it'll be impossible to change a comma in that mammoth of an article. We're not here for the money, are we? Love DF's books though I do, I'd rather work with nice people than become involved in disgusting bickers with a bloke so ludicrously high up his own arse*, constantly patronising and demeaning other users as well as reverting every single edit he disagrees with. Can't stomach that. It's just not on in me book.
 * Took a look-see at the Themes article and seems rather good, more's the pity.
 * Sorry for all this jabber, but I feel I can be frank with you, Keepers. And you know me, I'm outspoken, not to say an unceremonious bitch.
 * (*)I'm referring just to his virtual persona, of course, he might be cute in real life and all, but by the hey ho!, he's a nasty piece of work on Wiki – (see my comments on talk) and . Self-explanatory, innit? And this is nowt compared with what he said to other people here, there and every-fucking-where. In the words of good ol' Willy – and to give my ramblings a touch of glamour – "Leave thy vain bibble babble (12th nite), [you] contemptuous base born callet (Harry VI).
 * Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  03:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, I wish this kind of comments weren't here, especially because some might consider them futile tittle-tattle. Erroneously, I daresay, for this is just two users concerned about an article that deserves better. And sadly, there is no such thing as privacy in this realm. *sighs*.

Umm
I though you were off the Orange (fruit)s, but I see you are still slogging away. . What gives? Ceoil (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Hiya, snoop. You've gone and spied on me, eh? Tsk.
 * Nah, that shit is the never-ending shit. The more I look at it, the less I know how to deal with it and the more crap it gets. Anyway, it's less complex - content-wise, I mean – than that Virgin of yours. Less fun though. But I'm not being myself lately.
 * Howz you, my luverly decrepit graddad? -- Coco Lacoste  talk  01:23, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Glad to see you around. Alive and kicking... or alive at least. Was worried sick, fearing that you'd followed my advice on electricity.
 * Dont be a mercy to requests long gone, esp as it seems that page is not cared or tended to. Me, Im kicking ever so often, but only when not brought my medicine....thats when you got to watch out:) Ive called in a few other heavies for the van eyck page, and waiting for TK to return. I have bits in the meantime, but am being devil may care fopr now. Anyway, whats all the decrepit graddad business you utter fecking singgular bastard/bitch; I may wear comfortable warm socks, a cardigan and smoke a pipe but I'll...oh wait. Ceoil (talk) 01:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thing is, I copy-edited that article for the GOCE November drive. Even though 'twas not finished, a kind gent put it as if it was (see above if you can be arsed), so I feel hugely indebted to him and the rest of the ppl at GOCE and wanna finish off that nightmare.
 * Cool. Besides, the book TK's mentioned sounds promising. You're always devilish, petal. That's why I'm keeping a close eye on the Madonna and may pop in there to make tweaks.
 * The business, you mean? Well, in our last crack – the first time I've ever seen the words Hitler and monkeys in the same bloody sentence, for crying out loud! – you seem a tad confused and all your blabber distressed me no end.
 * You won't show any respect, will ya? Calling me names? You annoying scumbag, bugger off right now, or else!
 * Don't forget your hot-water bottle, darling. I'm 85, I know where you're coming from.
 * Oh, almost forgot to say you're very observant: all those phrases about my subconscious and shit. Either that, or my bonkerness is far more evident than I think.
 * PS, a few minutes later. Crikey! You were at the Madonna. Didn't get email, though. My wikimail is wonky. Screw it. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  02:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I just mean you should spread your wings more, c/eing pages that are barely c class and attended by none, and worrying about adfs subpages of people you could are slightly less than nothing about, whatever barnstars they give you. Just a hint dear, your worth more sparrows than that. If I was you and if I want to get, oh, "satisfaction" for my effort, I'd be looking at wp:fac and choosing from there. More likely to be engaging and rewarding, plus you will meet a bunch more and wider range of wiki people. Anyays.....Ceoil (talk) 03:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * ps, sorry if I seem as grumpy, im not a very happy bunny tonight, have been suffering from dizzyness and wosiness all week, normal transmission to resume shortly...) Ceoil (talk) 03:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, spud, but a) I don't really care about pointy thingies, honestly and b) going to the FAC page right now would be punching well above my weight. I'm still a newbie, ye know.
 * The GOCE page's great. Many people go there to get articles checked before pushing them for a GA or FAC. That's how I ended up at DF, remember? Dunno what you mean by "subpages". *flummoxed*
 * You had me at "sparrows"... that's Irish for ? *ponders* (nowt rude, I hope, bastard).
 * Worry not, dear old fellow: I'm already used to your being grumpy. And dat's why I like you. Sorry to hear about that arsing grogginess. Get well soon. I ain't a happy bunny either, if it's any consolation. Downright rotten week for me.
 * Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  04:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh dont get me wrong, the GOCE *are* great, its selfless but very valuable work, they are unsung heroes in my book. I certainly owe individual members a hell of a lot. Ceoil (talk) 22:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * old one but still works. Thanks for all the help and hope you have a great and relatively sober one. Ceoil (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Re your deleted post, you're a bad person, mate. And so am I, for laughing my arse off at that. Too bad someone seems to be learnig
 * What you doing up in the wee early hours, petal?
 * What does sober mean?
 * Thanks and back atcha. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  04:12, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm way worse even than that, my deleted post was me on a good day, thats as nice as I get. Re early hours.....oh yeah....zzzzzzz....talk later and tks for the help so far it is really appreciated you are helping a lot. Ceoil (talk) 04:17, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, 'course, already knew that. At least you can get to some level of niceness. I can't, not in my rotten nature.
 * Aww, shucks. Now I've got a little more time, I'll try to read some books and immerse my philistine myself into the Flemish thingy, so that I can make real edits and not my usual fluffiness. Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  04:24, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I resent being described as on "some level of niceness". Take that shit back. My evilness and bitchiness is carfully cultivated and Im a proud man. At least acknowledge me as twisted as you obviously are. Ceoil (talk) 04:27, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Deepest apologies, sunshine. I stand corrected: you are the most hideous, heinous, soulles bastard I've ever met. A proper turd softened by the rain who can't even answer what sober means. Satisfied? -- Coco Lacoste  talk  04:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, soz, chum but not as twisty as me.
 * .No. Ceoil (talk) 09:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Jesus wept! Could you please be more specific, please? I mean, what the hell does your no refer to? Your perpetual dissatisfaction? My unbeatable wickedness? Who's good auld Barry? You or me? (*)
 * Anyway, I don't give much of a bleeding toss: with that link, you've just won me over, delectable scumbag.
 * Eternally, devotionally and fervently yours, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  09:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * PS, C'mon, fess up. You don't seem to sleep, are you this chap?
 * (*)I now geddit, stupid cow me, thick as thickness. Sire is not happy with my beautigully worded insults. Have a little patience, you devilish creature: I'll come up with new ones, promise.
 * Sleep is for loosers, time when you enemies are able to gather and plot; Margaret Thatcher needed only 3 hours a night, Stalin even less. Thats the standard Im aiming for. O and glad to see your not so thick. Ceoil (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm a chronic insomniac, so there! In yer face, you prissy ninny!!! Remember, remember the 5th of November...
 * I tell you my love and this is your answer? Bugger the sod off. Tsk.-- Coco Lacoste  talk  10:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Worry not, my dearest darling. I'll be celebrating – so to speak – Crimbo like this →
 * We Pagans have no morals and tend to shag ourselves rotten without compunction, while you just kiss under the mistletoe. Procul hinc, procul esti, severes. Non estis teneris apta theatra meis (Ovid).
 * In case you're wondering, yup: I happen to be the lass on the right.
 * Go easy on the mince pies. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  10:47, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Which makes me even even more steely resolute that I have to either drive a stake through your pagan heart or convert you. Havnt decided yet. Ceoil (talk) 10:54, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. I'm a lady of principle, the Lucretia of these morally depraved times.
 * Be merciless. -- Coco Lacoste  talk  11:07, 23 December 2012 (UTC)



Thanks
For the New Year greetings and the same back to you. I hope to be around more in the new year, but probably will be out for a few weeks more. Truthkeeper (talk) 17:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Galyna Zubchenko's page
Hi, I made some corrections and write on talk page of my account.

Olexchest (talk) 09:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for answer, updated something. Olexchest (talk) 09:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Answered some questions and have own. Olexchest (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Perfect! Thanks. Shall have a look. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  14:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * PS, I'm gonna leave some comments on your talk.


 * I do what I can by now and write it on article's talk page. Olexchest (talk) 18:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I have updated article's talk page. Olexchest (talk) 16:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I answered your questions. Olexchest (talk) 08:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I corrected Sources, as I can. Olexchest (talk) 13:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I made some corrections and left a couple of inline comments. I've been a bit busy and couldn't work on the article, sorry. I'll try to rewrite as much as possible during the weekend. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  06:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Doesn't matter, you do great thing. When you will be in Ukraine we can give you a little painting as gift as sign of our appreciation ) I put on Talk page lost page of english catalogue
 * 46.203.87.123 (talk) 05:38, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I answered your questions.


 * 193.110.189.75 (talk) 09:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your participating in this! I very appreciated. Good luck in all!


 * Olexchest (talk) 19:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I answered your questions and write one own for you on the Talk Page.


 * Olexchest (talk) 09:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all! You was great help with the article.


 * Olexchest (talk) 04:45, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your kind words. Glad to be of help. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  16:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Thoughts
If you have them petal, I'd share them now. Ceoil (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The Virgin and her inscriptions
Here's a link to Dhanens at Amazon (US) -. Unfortunately it's a book that has to be bought (or stolen) but can't be found on google-bloody-books. I noticed the discrepancy in the inscriptions but had to stop. I'll have a look at the links, hopefully today but a bit busy again through the weekend, and figure out what's going on. Truthkeeper (talk) 13:05, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi CL, thanks a ton for stepping up to help and for all the copyedits! I'm not quite out of the woods yet but at least now well enough to parse this. I've gone back and forth on that point in my own mind - whether to have the inscriptions in the iconography para or to leave where they are, and to be honest I can't quite make up my mind. It seems to belong in the iconography section, yet seems to work okay too in the description section. Let me think on it a bit, and let's see too whether Ceoil has an opinion. Truthkeeper (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Glad that migraine's cleared up. No worries, they were just a couple of tweaks here und there. Nothing substantial. Shit, that was hard to parse: too long a sentence, my bad. Anyway, making myself clear: I didn't mean all the inscriptions, just the mention of the 5th stanza: since it's not an inscription as such, seems a tad disjointed there – just the opinion of a muddled brain, I haven't been myself lately.
 * Hey, I've seen the Madonna is a FAC now. Great! (Late to the party as usual, courtesy of Wikicrapmail). Thanks ever so much for mentioning yours truly.
 * Btw and re: the underhyphenation (is this a word?) mentioned at the review: I'm pretty sure up to date doesn't require hyphens there because it's a predicative adj – didn't change it as the article is nommed and I don't want to mess with it, just in case. I've trawled through MoS in search of info about images on the left but couldn't find anything.
 * Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  talk  21:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * PS, Mind the bears while in the woods, darling. We all know what them bastards do.
 * Nah, it wasn't your sentence that was the problem, but my brain. I see that it's been moved - and somewhat how I would have done it, had I been capable, but I do think it's a tricky section. You deserve the mention - lot's of backup from you! Will look at "up to date", thanks for the head's up. Yeah, I know all about the bears in the woods. I run away from them! Take care, Truthkeeper (talk) 22:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Consider this from me too! You are fabulous and really lots of fun. And a very very good copyeditor! Truthkeeper (talk) 13:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Me
Is a bit of an ignoring bastard, yeah right enough. Sorry man/gal I've been gone for so so long, I could make excuses...the dog ate my modem and so on, but Im not sure youd buy them. Put it this way, I respect you too much to lie to you. See what I did there? Am I in your good books again? Great. Peace in our time. Ceoil (talk) 12:40, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * PS, I see you are now an old pro at FAC, good for you. There is no tenure required there, and you are, if I might be so bold, very perceptive and articulate, Im delighted to see. Ceoil (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Nice job on the Halyna Zubchenko page!
Thanks a lot for stepping in and helping Alexander with that page. I left a message for both of you on its talk page. You clearly put a LOT of effort into it! --Martha (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Translation request
Hello. For reasons of edit history and personality, I have chosen you from all of the editors listed at Category:Translators en-es for this request. I happened to notice that the article Cadaver Synod doesn't have a Spanish link in the languages sidebar. This article is quite interesting and, I believe, would make a good contribution to the Spanish Wikipedia. Would you be willing to create this article there, and do the necessary translation? Thank you for your time. 24.22.75.14 (talk) 04:51, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Madonna in the Church FA
Hey stranger. This was promoted during the week, in no small part thanks to you. Just bidding my hat and saying thanks very much for all the work you put into it. Ceoil (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Horrible Histories
Hi Coco, it would be good to your thoughts on the converstation over at Horrible Histories. We have contact. Span (talk) 17:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The Taymouth Hours April.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Taymouth Hours April.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Pope Paul III and his Grandsons
Officaially asking for help here. Its 3/4 ways written and a mess. Starting the process of asking in the heavies here. Large, stern men tidy with a pen, required ;0 Ceoil (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You too can have the unique, brand-new, fabulous CocoTyposcourer™!!!!
 * Only 20 chocolate-coated toffee chunks and 30 chocolate-coated almonds from that Macroom sweetshop!
 * Warning: Using the CocoTyposcourer™ on non-stick surfaces such as Teflon is not advisable. This message is brought to you by CocoLacoste Inc.
 * Oi, cockmunch, thanks for stepping in at the Taymouth Hours. Really enjoy working with you. Oh, frabjous day! Could use a lil' help with the images there -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  13:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)




 * Obsequious lickspittles, that's what I like. Red wine for me, Paulina
 * Dont call me shirley. Ceoil (talk) 17:56, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You can't be serious. Sandra
 * Serious as cancer. paul (talk) 19:71, 34 August 1843 (UTC)
 * Where's the conclave? Giulia la B
 * Jesus you are a tough bitch. Reading. Brad (talk) 18:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, haven't changed owt significant. I've jotted down a couple of suggestions/ questions but can't deal with them right now – I've stopped up all night, all done in. Lucrezia

Nothing in paticular
Hello there. Just wondering how her vulgarness is doing. Nothing strange here, rain expected on Sunday, heavy over the north, clearing Monday. Ceoil (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, hello, my darlingest heart! How are you keeping? me, feeling like shit on shovel, but hey ho, let's keep things cheery Been working like crazy last month (14, 16 hrs. a day, murderous) and w/o internet connection at home (courtesy of the twat that cut the cable off, literally). Thanks for popping by. Hope you're grand. Laters, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  23:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * working like crazy ? Snap. Got home at a resonable hour this evening. Great, but what do I do...slog here for free. Goddamn me. Ceoil (talk) 00:25, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Your altruistic dedication will be compensated, some day, in Heaven... perhaps. I plod away for free IRL, if it's any consolation (not that I'm complaining). Speaking of work, fancy taking a look at what I've added to Taymouth Hours and see if it makes any sense? Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  00:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look, and you might want to ask V also, who knows more than I do on this area. Ceoil (talk) 03:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * First warning in describing us as "Corkish". We are legion, but will allow one other warning before it all gets out of hand and becomes serious. Ceoil (talk) 14:47, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Bring. It. On. Cute hoor, bring it on. -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  00:36, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Horrible Histories article rewrite
Hi Cocolacoste -- I noticed you're the last major editor on Horrible Histories (2009 TV series), so am getting in touch as I'd like to do some extensive work on the article myself, to address the concerns raised in the article's warning template, and don't want to end up stepping on anyone's toes. As per the note left on the article's talkpage, it would basically be in line with your recent edits, with which I incidentally totally agree (some silent cheering may-or-may-not have taken place while reading, actually). Please let me know if you have any issues. Shoebox2 (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, Shoebox. Please, go ahead and hack away. Unmercifully. I'm not very dedicated to that article at the moment – I've just chopped some nonsensical waffle off – but it'd be nice to see it in a better shape.

One thing, though: you don't need to "ask for permission" to edit an article. Just go off and do it (Wikijargon be bold blah, blah). If someone happens to disagree with you, well, tough... That's what talkpages are for (and Wikijargon discuss, be polite, civility, yada, yada). Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  22:37, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

PS, Things may escalate to unimaginably tempestuous levels but hey!, "Welcome to Wikipedia" (disclaimer: I may not be the best adviser).


 * I think I get the idea. :) Thank you much, looking forward to working with you. Shoebox2 (talk) 23:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Some extra info that was collected late into the rewrite stage
Hey Cocolacoste :). I've kept to a strictly supportive role throughout this (incredibly skilled and downright awesome) rewrite, quietly scouting the web for possible sources and adding them to the talk page. Since the article is getting ready to go up, and may only need a few tweaks here and there, I was wondering if you'd care to take a peak at the page and lend your thoughts to see how any useable information can be incorporated. I especially think a peak at the links in the "miscellaneous" section may be good. I haven't actually read those yet and you seem to be better at extracting useable info than i.--Coin945 (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No, sorry. As I strongly believe in Wikipedia as a collaborative project, I think the best place to discuss these issues is the article's talkpage.
 * As an aside: If I may say so, editing someone else's sandbox without consulting them first is rather discourteous. Just my opinion, of course. Best, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  10:16, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

EP
Thanks for this revert. I was kind of thinking about leaving it - that one had fewer fields filled in for one thing - but mostly so as to minimize even more friction. I see from above that "your" mediation was declined. Happy hols, btw. Hope you have something great planned. Victoria (talk) 14:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Anytime. I don't really like making this type of changes to articles I've never edited but... but... when insomniac, I'll lose my scruples. Anyway, it looked like a genuine GF addition. Happy holidays to you too. Take care, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  15:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Always happy to cheer up! You've been doing some fabulous work! I've meant to stop by to tell you but always seem to be hacking at the coal seam here and never time to stop by and chat. Take care to you too! Victoria (talk) 15:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Now, now, m'lady, you're being kind to a fault.
 * À propos de rien, I've been meaning to share this w/ someone. This is the very reason bolloxes are evil. A gentleman I'd shag marry if he were real, and there he is, his beauty obscured by a rectangle. -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  16:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I've boosted his beauty a bit - not only a rectangle but a colored rectangle!
 * No, not being kind to a fault. I'm seeing some impressive work. Would like to jump in and help at some point, but "at some point" never seems to happen. Or something. Victoria (talk) 18:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Victoria. This means a lot to me, more than you can imagine. Hugs, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  21:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC) If I ever overcome my stupidity and manage to scribble a little article I have in mind, I'll coerce you into helping me, so don't you worry, my fine friend.
 * Well it's an interesting case, that dark moody painter! HIs i****b*x started like this which essentially repeats the first sentence. Now it looks like this, so it's grown. I might be inclined to advise trying an Brianboulton type of "Identibox" as in Percy Grainger.
 * Please don't hesitate to send any smallish scribbles my way any time - though perhaps they should be going in the opposite direction (i.,e I should be sending mine your way)! Victoria (talk) 01:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Horrible Histories

 * Thanks ever so much, Span! Although all the kudos should really go to Shoebox. By the way, you've made me change my stance on that "thank" gizmo – it could be useful sometimes. Had a good chuckle yesterday. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  21:52, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Your contribution to all this has really counted. Span (talk) 23:36, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday greetings

 * Ooooh... What a lovely image. Thanks, Victoria! Hope you've found lots of pressies under the tree. -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  23:48, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The fat man from oop North has left Music present.jpg this for you

Best wishes

 * Thanks, you gorgeous bastard, and the same to you. I hold you in the highest regard as a contributor and this means a lot to me. -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  23:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You brighten this place up, and you are very talented, so you know, deserved. Ceoil (talk) 01:08, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hmm. No good wish is without strings, or something. I could do with help on Head VI, if your interested. I hate to ask, sort of, and could really do with a person who kows how to string a sentence together. Ceoil (talk) 13:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * On my to-do list. Shall get to it over the weekend. Jesus, those paintings... such a raw, unsettling beauty...
 * Never hesitate to ask, devilish creature: I'm always happy (nay, honoured) to lend you a hand. My doors are open for you and this is a smoking area. Your most humble and obedient servant, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  23:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC) A pope. Again. Make your intentions of world domination a bit less obvious, for fuck's sake

Happy New Year


Happy New Year, Coco. Thanks for all the good work. Span (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Many happy returns, Span! -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  03:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Head VI
Sound for the copyedits - it reads like english now! I might try and expand over the w/end, so expect grammatic trouble and odd combinations of letters. Ceoil (talk) 23:18, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Cheers, Ceoil. It's an interesting article. Tried to fix the quote in the intro but the book isn't online. Also, have you seen my inline q re: cope/cape? Oh, an external link has been added as "existence proof" the fuck? . Wouldn't this (Arts Council) or the Estate of Francis Bacon, without the mention of Innocent IX instead of X, be better? -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  01:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Well any source used that mentions that once up a time there was a Francis Bacon that painted a Head IV is probably good enough. I was sure I used such a source later in the article! Lookly the whole thing has been verified now, and I am not victim of an eloberate 60 year old hoax perputated by multiple mischievious art historians and major art gallery and auction houses. Ceoil (talk) 01:42, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Just wanted to say thanks...

 * Thanks, Shoebox. It's very nice of you to say so. Cheers, -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  01:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * PS, You made the right move – that talk had been bugging me for months – only that you got a bit radical.

Borges
Thanks for your work on Borges. What is your overall sense of it as an article? I did some major work on it about four years ago and it has not has much done on it since. Span (talk) 20:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

GA nom for Horrible Histories
Hi Coco, not sure if you're aware, but I'm currently in the process of shepherding the Horrible Histories TV series article through it's GA nomination. The reviewer tells me it's potentially FA material, which is exciting, but also means the review is much more exhaustive. I do feel like her suggestions are excellent, and taking (many of) them I think has resulted in a stronger article... just feeling a bit overwhelmed by how much is involved, and that some further assurance that I'm on the right track wouldn't come amiss. :) If you have the time, would you mind taking a quick look at the review thread and seeing what you think? Shoebox 2   talk  16:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

You
Are charming and funny. Not funny as in "funny how", just you make me laugh, like. not happy - damn you to hell. Ceoil (talk) 11:54, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Moi? He, he... you don't know me, innocent soul. -- Coco Lacoste  (talk)  00:00, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

GOCE March drive wrapup
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: Horrible Histories (2009 TV series)
This is a note to let the main editors of Horrible Histories (2009 TV series) know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 16, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at present, please ask. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/April 16, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Horrible Histories is a children's sketch-comedy adaptation of Terry Deary's long-running book series, produced by Lion Television with Citrus Television, that ran for five 13-episode series on Britain's CBBC from 2009 to 2013. Like the books, it was intended to foster childrens' interest in British and other Western world history through factual anecdotes chosen with a focus on "gross-out"-style humour and comic violence – "history with the nasty bits left in". The producers of the TV series recruited writers and performers with roots in the adult British comedy community. These in turn took a deliberately non-condescending approach, relying instead on such influences as Blackadder and the Monty Python films. A focus on historical accuracy was combined with a comedy style relying heavily on parodies of current UK pop-culture to make those facts more accessible, leading to takeoffs of Masterchef, The Apprentice and Wife Swap among others. The result won numerous domestic and international awards, including two British Comedy Awards and four consecutive Children's BAFTAs, and eventually garnered respect as a classic from viewers of all ages. UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Stuff
You are a sweetheart, beloved almost. Mentioned at FAC, beware. Ceoil (talk) 10:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Shirley
Just a note to say that I've sent email re Shirley but didn't use the "bitch" subject - I hope I don't come across that badly! Also, I want to apologize for calling you "sweetie" on my last response to you - it's a term I use often in real life with people I like and I was typing quickly without thinking but probably not appropriate here. I've been doing a good job stumbling over my feet recently in on-line communication. Trying to untangle. Take care. Victoria (tk) 16:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

December 2014 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE holiday 2014 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

GOCE 2014 report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

April 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

GOCE June 2015 newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

GOCE August 2015 newsletter

 * sent by via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:43, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

October 2015 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors September 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2016 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

GOCE February 2018 news
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

June 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Discussion at Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
You are invited to join the discussion at Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser. Indef blocked user you're familiar with is requesting permissions here. Please take a look and comment if you have an opinion. S warm  ♠  19:36, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

August GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

December 2018 GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

GOCE 2018 Annual Report
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

March GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

GOCE December 2019 Newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC).

Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
 Baffle☿gab  03:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)