User talk:Cocorrector

Nomination of MacCullagh ellipsoid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacCullagh ellipsoid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MacCullagh ellipsoid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D.Lazard (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
MrOllie (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Galois axis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galois axis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Galois axis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — MarkH21 (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Lame arguments at ANI
I'm posting this here since I'm somewhat confused whether your socking or just a meatpuppet and who the master is anyway. In the event you are ever unblocked, do note that "they were deleting not editing" is an even lamer argument at ANI then "they didn't discuss, even though nor did I". Perhaps this is in part because your English level is less than native but on wikipedia, deletion is by definition part of the editing process. Mind you, calling something WP:vandalism when it clearly is not vandalism is IMO an even lamer argument. If you want anyone to take you seriously, do use the talk page to discuss WP:content disputes whether those content disputes involve deletion or whatever else. Don't call stuff vandalism when it's good faith editing. If you demonstrate silly behaviour by refusing to discuss e.g. by insisting someone else opens the discussion first or the article is reverted to your preferred WP:WRONGVERSION before discussion and/or persistently calling stuff vandalism which isn't, expect to get no where even if you aren't socking. Nil Einne (talk) 09:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

"Galois axis" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Galois axis. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Salix alba (talk): 19:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)