User talk:CocosIslands1/No Google advertisements

Speedy Deletion
This Article Should be quickly deleted. It is obviously not a useful article. Please do not remove any speedy deletion tags. No I am not a sock puppet. I am simply on a different computer. 73.230.205.178 (talk)
 * This is very clearly not a G11 candidate. Figure out the right tag. CUPIDICAE💕  23:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I put a general tag on there as I could not figure out the right one. I originally had g1 but changed it to g7 but was going to revert it. I do not think g1 applies as the text is readable. Just not useful. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe i have found the correct tag. a3. Please do not revert my edit as this clearly falls under a3. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:22, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * None of those tags apply. A3 isn't applicable in project space. CUPIDICAE💕  23:23, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "This applies to articles consisting only of external links, category tags or "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title," - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:A3 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:25, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes it applies to articles. Is this an article? The answer is no. CUPIDICAE💕  23:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are going to keep reverting my edits the least you can do is add the correct tag yourself instead of deleting the template entirely. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:29, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Or, hear me out, you should stop messing with deletion tags on this ip and the other you were using because it was blatant disruption. CUPIDICAE💕  23:31, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * How am i disrupting anything? I am just trying to mark a page that is obviously not needed. If this was an actual project the author would have probably updated it by now. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Why not just let the admins deal with this and let them decide? 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * In the future if a page is a candidate for speedy deletion and you believe it does not have the right tag. Please change it to the correct tag instead of deleting the tag altogether. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It would be great if you would stop lecturing me on how to apply or remove speedy tags. I am more than qualified to assess them and as an editor who didn't create the page, I'm allowed to remove them. CUPIDICAE💕  23:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Then please just add the right tag. This doesn't need to be a big debate. I give you full permission to edit the tag bypassing the 3 revision rule as long as you do not delete the candidate for speedy deletion notice. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:50, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't need your permission to remove it. CUPIDICAE💕  23:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 3 revert rule. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * But this is not about that. If you know the correct tag then just add it and please stop wasting my time. If you do not know the correct tag or do not think this should be deleted then let an admin decide. 73.230.205.178 (talk) 23:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Do not lecture me about 3rr when you yourself already violated it. CUPIDICAE💕  23:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * A few things. Firstly, this is clearly a brand new editor who isn't familiar with editing yet. Please avoid biting the newcomer by adding all these deletion tags. I've userfied this draft and tried to leave a note on the editor's talk page—hopefully we haven't scared them off yet. Secondly, whenever a page has the prefix  in the title, that means that the page is in the project namespace and is not technically a part of the encyclopedia. Therefore, different rules apply. Editors are free to write opinions about the project's governance in the project space, for example. Because of this, it's not clear to me that this page should be deleted even if it wasn't created by a newcomer. Mz7 (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)