User talk:Cocz6d/sandbox

Geotherapy

· Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the article was relevant and it had great info. The only issue is since the article is so short a couple of topics that it brought up could be expanded.

· Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? I didn't find any biased information but the article does go into detail about the Declaration for Geotherapy and Bioethics which makes me think where the origins / research for those ideas come from and if there are any other branches with similar values that stemmed from those findings.

· Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I think Geotherapy is a part of a larger idea of measuring and diagnosing global environmental situations and there could be a section added to the article about similar principles

· Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The links do work except for a few that Safari can't open.

· Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? This article is listed under the academic articles link but there seems to be a lot of errors with the links at the bottom of the article that could be updated or removed entirely since they don't work. Also a couple pictures would be a nice touch to the article.

· How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? This article isn't part of any WikiProjects but since environmental topics, such as global warming, are gaining interest with the general public this article could easily join one. WikiProject Environment is a good one.