User talk:Cod8

Welcome!
Hello, Cod8, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=583205447 your edit] to Ben Brown (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:34, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * AFL biography

Proposed deletion of Kanye Turner


The article Kanye Turner has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 11:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pavlova (food). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 08:16, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Pavlova (food) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 08:21, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pavlova (food). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:3RR. You have breached it. HiLo48 (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Dear friend...
I saw the ANI discussion, it looks like you have a better understanding of our polices on copyright and such. I also see that you were in an edit war with a number of editors. As some have pointed out, doing that will get you blocked. They quote things like WP:3RR, but really, it isn't a matter of counting edits, it is a matter of determining that someone is using a disruptive behavior, so I would never rely on counting my reverts to avoid getting blocked. I see you haven't edited in a few hours, not sure if that is due to you sleeping/working/eating/real life, or because you "get it", and know you can't do that. I'm hoping the latter, because we really don't like edit warring. While I'm very tolerant of heated debate on talk pages (and in fact encourage you to always use the talk page to discussion once you have been reverted the first time), we don't like to see the article content bouncing around. It isn't in the best interest of the reader if we do that. Anyway, hopefully this is all past you, and hopefully it won't get to a situation where a block is even considered. As long as you use the talk page an get consensus for contentious edits, you really can't go wrong here. Dennis - 2&cent; 16:22, 11 November 2014 (UTC)