User talk:CodeLyoko/Archive 2

Speedy deletion declined: Auslogics Disk Defrag
Hello TheMesquito, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Auslogics Disk Defrag, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Kept at Articles for deletion/Auslogics Disk Defrag (3rd nomination). Another AfD may be in order.''' You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=600426743 your edit] to Wii may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:


 * May 2014), WiiConnect24, Wii Shop ChannelBracketBot (talk) 09:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

HELP. i AM SORRY I REALLY CANNOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING BESIDES THE BASIC EDIT. I DO NOT MEAN TO BREAK THE RULES. CAN SOMEONE WRITE TO ME. OR CAN I EMAIL SOMEONE. THANKS MUCH. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cori arevalo (talk • contribs) 06:33, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

RE: A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much for the shiny barnstar! Though it's not "prevent" vandalism - more like "cleaning up" vandalism. Because if I could prevent vandalism - I'd put a lot of rollbackers out of a job! K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 18:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

San Antonio Edit
It was not a mistake, but an item that needed that edit. I am an employee at the San Antonio Express-News. Robert Rivard is not the editor of the San Antonio Express-News, and hasn't been for nearly 2 years now.

Cheers, Chuck


 * First off, please sign your post with four ~. Second off, I removed your edit because you removed a section without an explanation in the edit summary, so i did not know if you where just doing it to vandalize the page. TheMesquito (talk) 21:18, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Poor Man's Talk Back
I responded to your post on my talk page. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 22:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Angie Goff, March 2014
Hello, I'm TheMesquito. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Angie Goff, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TheMesquito (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello. Please look at the edit hitory. Anytime ANYONE--not just I-make an edit neutralhomer reverts. I posted to the talk page which neutralhomer also deleted. Neutralhomer needs to be blocked for disruption. Thank You.172.243.128.84 (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

mesquito, why do you feel i am wrong ? did you review the edits ? Here is proof. I edited this article. Another person added the information and it is sourced. neutralhomer keeps deleting it. If you look at the edit history, since last year neutralhomer has been doing this. Neutralhomer said it removed information per request, request from ? Eposty restored the information. Neutralhomer was told to discuss on article's discussion page but has not done so. I posted about my edits on the discussion page. neutralhomer deleted it, and then threatened me that I will be blocked. I returned my post on the discussion page, neutralhomer deleted it again for the second time. Why delete my post on the article discussion page when that is the right way to use wikip to reach consensus. I think neutralhomer needs to be blocked for disruption. neutralhomer is deleting valid sourced information. neutralhomer is deleting discussions on the article take page.172.243.128.84 (talk) 22:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

tollywood change
I am sorry.. i did forget to leave description. was trying to update info on tollywood which is valid. tollywood is the second largest film industry in india after bollywood. i was just searching for it and found that and updated.
 * It is a disambiguation page should not contain any information just what the the word could refer to when searched (in the case of words that mean many different things see WP:D for more infomation TheMesquito (talk) 23:57, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

oh ok. sorry abt that.. tq for the info.

sir should i redo the changes or you dont want me to?
hi sir.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tollywood

can i update the changes or you do not want me to ?


 * Don't redo anything, it has already been fixed. Disambiguation pages don't need excessive commentary as per WP:MOSDAB . No further page edits are needed. TheMesquito (talk) 00:05, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

ok. got you. Sairam Maganti (talk) 00:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

what do you know about telugu cinema? i have kept some links to the movie industry and i dont understand how come you can undo them as per your will. Sairam Maganti (talk)

Akkarshan
Hi. I've declined your A7 as it appears to be a film not a person. You have to get to the end of it to find that out (and for their sake, I hope the film itself is easier to understand...). I've prodded it. Peridon (talk) 19:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I could have swore it was about a person, but the article is hard to read, so I guess I was mistaken. Thanks for informing me! TheMesquito (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Prod tag
Hi. Please read WP:SPORTCRIT "...if they have, for example, participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level (such as the Olympics)." Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I put a Speedy Deletion tag not a PROD tag TheMesquito (talk) 19:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Not understanding the policy about notability and slapping tags on such pages can be viewed as disrputive and could lead to you being blocked. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I did not tag it for notability, i tagged it for having no content, and either way you are not supposed to remove speedy deletion tags if you are the page creator. Stop threatening me TheMesquito (talk) 19:14, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I attempted to edit the page "Joel Selwood" in order to make the page readable. I removed content not because I'm a vandal but because the page needs editing. The current page is ridiculously convoluted, full of unnecessary padding, written more in the style of a fan club shrine than as an objective encyclopaedic page. I would appreciate if you could read the restored page and then compare it with my final edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.41.19 (talk) 19:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar
Hey! Thanks for the barnstar! R mosler | ●   01:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
K6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 19:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Saarducci (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi i don't know how to do this but i find your reasons kinda disrespectful, thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:190.232.76.158#April_2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.232.76.158 (talk) 01:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Why did u deleted my part in SHSID? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.168.115.42 (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

MOBA and Ferret
No, it wasn't civil, I entirely agree. I'm writing a games design document, I edit the MOBA page with a better written explanation of a MOBA and he comes along and reverts the changes on the basis, if you can believe it, that it lacked sources, even though both the former and the latter were effectively the same content. The word I used wasn't civil, I grant you, but it was highly accurate for a petty reversion like that. Someone wants to cause me grief, I'll give them some in return, thank you so very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.239.102 (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Please assume WP:GOODFAITH in any edit, and don't attack an user when bringing up something, be civil. You did not need to call him/her a "Bloddy Polick" on the page and that is why i reverted it, bring it up in a more civil manner. Also please sound your posts with four ~ so i can see who is commenting. Thanks, TheMesquito (talk) 02:42, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Apology
Hello fellow Texan, I'm sorry that I blanked the section on the Dustinliu76 archive. I blanked it because I didn't know what was sockpuppeting at first. Now, I do know. I will no longer do it anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dustinliu76 (talk) 22:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Dustinliu75 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi I removed them albums because they are exclusive to certain places and are not apart of their Official Discography Kind regards Luke.86.19.151.163 (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2014 (UTC)\
 * Please leave a proper edit summery then, just blanking content without adding one looks like vandalism. Thanks, TheMesquito (talk) 23:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok Apologies kind regards Luke 86.19.151.163 (talk) 23:12, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Re: April 2014 (regarding modifications in Eaten Alive)
TheMosquito, I think you did a mistake in restoring the contents. I removed stuff which had already gained a main article (The Eaten Alive Demos), being therefore redundant repeat it all in an umbrella article (Eaten Alive (album)). Sorry, anyway, have I forgotten to explain my changes in the article. I ask you to undo your restoration. Thank you. 200.244.52.21 (talk) 21:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Ging287 (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Recent revert on Sabyasachi Panda
Hi TheMesquito

It is good to learn about your immediate response and efforts in general. I would like to bring to your notice that the fact about "Sabyasachi Panda" joining the mentioned political party and it inviting her relies on some random articles online, most likely baseless and fake. There are no such reports on the more reliable news channels and websites. Anyway it would be helpful and constructive if you could at least put a message questioning the article's genuineness. Thanks 164.107.165.43 (talk) 01:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

The Fed edits
Hello TheMesquito,

I admire your speed! You almost instantaneously reverted the changes I made to The Fed page. However, I disagree with your contention that my changes were not constructive. Quite the contrary: I personally know most of the Fed alumni, and I can vouch that none are notable. You should actually commend me for improving the page of an organization that I belonged to for several years, and for which I feel deep affection!

You are completely correct that wiki vandalism is obnoxious and detrimental, but I believe you are not in full possession of the facts in this particular case.

Sincerely,

Editor

Whey protein
Just letting you know, your revert of an IP's edit on whey protein had the effect of restoring promotional garbage that had been added earlier. The IP was doing the right thing. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Status update request
Kevintampa5 (talk) 03:29, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

UserGogo212121 Hello TheMesquito Can I upload from this site http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/ --Gogo212121 (talk) 07:38, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * IIRC you can, but i am not sure where it is listed (ask User:Armbrust) but I put the comment because the site you listed for license did not contain any license information. Thanks, TheMesquito (talk) 07:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

UserGogo212121 Hello TheMesquito what happens to the pictures that I have uploaded --Gogo212121 (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Babar Hayat
Hello there. I'm wondering why you nominated this one for speedy deletion. I can't see any signs of sockpuppetry in this article or in 's other contributions. If there's any special blocked user you've got in mind you might want to file an SPI though. De728631 (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, that was a screw up on my part, I read is ban date wrong and thought they created the page after the block was issued. Sorry about that. TheMesquito (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Well that wouldn't even have worked unless someone issued a block template without pushing the "block" button. After all, the purpose of a block is to disable someone's ability to edit any pages outside their own talk page. :) De728631 (talk) 23:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know why I did not think of that, sorry again! TheMesquito (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

sorry, I think it was an accident — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.116.144 (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

TheMesquito Buzz~  03:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Reverted Edit THE SALVATION ARMY
Dear Mosquito, This is my first time to make a contribution to Wikipedia, as well as to provide feedback to someone who has changed my edits.

If you remember, you changed my edit of The Salvation Army salute. I am a member of The Salvation Army church- a Soldier. In addition to that, I have been an ordained Salvation Army Officer for over 35 years. I do believe I have the experience and credentials to know what The Salvation Army salute means.

I would appreciate you correcting what you have changed. EmSaSat

108.45.146.241 (talk) 22:35, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Which image has been declined?
Sorry, but which image has been declined upload? I received a notification on my talk page about a declined request... but I ventured to the talk page for FFU and can't find any of my requests that have been declined. Ashton 29 (talk) 04:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * the script I was using got screwy, I am currently uploading now. Sorry for all the reverts! TheMesquito  buzz

Articles for deletion/Kenneth Brander
Why did you relist this? BMK (talk) 01:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:RELIST says:


 * However, if at the end of the initial seven-day period, the discussion has only a few participants (including the nominator), and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy, it may be appropriate for the closer to relist it, to solicit further discussion to determine consensus. A relisted discussion may be closed once consensus is determined without necessarily waiting a further seven days. That said, relisting should not be a substitute for a "no consensus" closure . If the closer feels there has been substantive debate, disparate opinions supported by policy have been expressed, and consensus has not been achieved, a no-consensus close may be preferable.


 * This AfD does not seem to meet the criteria for relisting. The majority of arguments on both sides were based on policy, and there was significant participation and considerable discussion between them.  What was your rationale for relisting it? BMK (talk) 01:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I see your point. I read through it and did not think it should be closed as No Consensus as of yet and thought that further conversation was needed, but now looking at it again, I agree with you. I can un-relist it if you want, or close it as No Consensus or what ever else you think need to be done. Sorry about that.  TheMesquito  buzz  02:11, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I think you should un-relist it and leave it for someone else to close. BMK (talk) 02:41, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi

I tried to upload a pic to a page

It was declined and the notice went to my spam box...just found it now

The reason given was that the file appeared to be copyrighted...actually it is my photo (so, made by me) and I don´t recall copyrighting it (but may have accidentally...who knows?)

Some info here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Deanimator#Your_request_at_Files_for_upload

How do I procede?...something about changing a line which is seriously challenging my literacy level.

Hope we can sort it out.

Cheers Dean Nixon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.146.253 (talk) 16:13, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * It was denied because, while under a Creative Commons license, it contains non-commercial (nc) or no-derivatives (nd), and we can't upload the picture if it contains that. It needs to be cc-by-2.0 or cc-by-sa-2.0 for us to upload it. If you want it to be uploaded, please change the about page and remove the  non-commercial (nc) or no-derivatives (nd). If you want more info about licenses, I would also ask  about it, he has been working in FFU much longer than me.  TheMesquito  buzz  19:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Steam Train Title Card.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Steam Train Title Card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

unauthorised editing
I have a message from you? stating that I edited a Wiki page about the SE of SA. I didn't; I wouldn't know how to. iain.millar@adelaide.on.net — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.3.216 (talk) 07:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

A whale for you!
For not having been trouted or whaled. Do some silly stuff now and again! Not doing so was silly ;) Have a great day! Cheers, Thanks,  L235 - Talk Ping when replying 05:15, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Picture submitted as requested
Hi! I have emailed about creative commons license use about the picture in the article. Also all citations are added accordingly, please have a look! Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperna (talk • contribs) 06:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

St Patrick's Cathedral
You said the file is already available on Wikipedia, but I cannot find it. I would still like to see it uploaded, regardless of if the page has enough images. Ashton 29 (talk) 02:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Request on 15:40:16, 5 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Zinfandelorganic
Sorry didnt realise about the tilds so am repeating my message. My submission has been rejected and I would like some help to improve it to enable it to be accepted. I have read 'what wikipedia is not for' Thanks Judy Zinfandelorganic Re Hunt Monitors Zinfandelorganic (talk) 15:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Zinfandelorganic (talk) 15:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

My submission rejected
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Zinfandelorganic#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Hunt_Monitors_.28October_5.29

Dear Mesquito, Could you please explain exactly why my submission was rejected please? I could also do with some help to improve it with a view to having it accepted!

I have read ' what wikipedia is not for ' and thought my submission would be acceptable.

Thanks Judy Zinfandelorganic Zinfandelorganic (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Your submission was a soapbox and seemed only to promote an entity. TheMesquito  buzz  15:55, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Request on 16:31:47, 5 October 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Zinfandelorganic
Thanks for your prompt reply saying that my submission seemed to be only to promote an entity I felt that I had explained and described what a Hunt Monitor is, what they do and why and tried to avoid promoting them, by only using facts and substantiating them with links to verify everything I said. Can you help me by suggesting how I can stop it sounding like a 'promotion?' I agree my first submission may have sounded more emotive but I understood that my final submission stood a chance of being accepted. Thanks again, Judy Zinfandelorganic (talk) 16:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Zinfandelorganic (talk) 16:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Banglapedia is an encyclopedia
This refers to your recent evaluation of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Varman dynasty of bengal. The draft article may be gone by the time you read this, since I determined that it was a copyvio of an article from Banglapedia cited as a reference in the article. Banglapedia appears to be a reliable source as "an intellectual output of over 1450 scholars" and with no obvious provision for edits by users. If the draft article was not a copyvio, I would probably have accepted it. Anyway, thank you for looking at the article as quickly as you did. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Reflections Unheard Official DVD Cover
Hello,

I'd just like to inform you that I've provided the non-free use rationale in the File Upload page upon your request. Although I placed a priority on providing the information within 7 days, it has been several weeks since I submitted the rationale and I have not received a response. It'd be much appreciated if you could review the rationale and get back to me at your earliest convenience.

Thanks, Nev

October 10, 2014 Nevline (talk) 20:46, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Native Name Edit
Hello The Mesquito, Myself Sumedh Tayade (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC), I am sorry for the edit i made to Wadala and you pointed out correctly about it but please don't delete the native name i have mentioned about the city, the term is widely used and recognised by the people of Wadala, if you can help me on how to give referencing or citations to the native name of a city in its official language, i would be thankful, its a humble request to you to not erase the native name of Wadala, however i would not mention the Marathi name in the first paragraph of the article, Your Opinions and Guidance are most welcome. Sumedh Tayade (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2015 (UTC)