User talk:CodingCanine

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Andrew Breitbart, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   21:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi CodingCanine! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Andrew Breitbart that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   21:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Andrew Breitbart, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   23:22, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Oddly enough, I feel like your edits and reversions are the disruptive ones. You can cite a thousand sources, academic or otherwise, but it doesn't make what they say true. They are still opinions and biased ones at that. There is no objective standard by which you can judge a publication "far right". The same standards are not applied at Wikipedia on articles about publications like HuffPo, which I'd call "far left", but as in this article, it isn't even described as "left leaning. Many people like myself feel that Wikipedia has a definite left ward tilt and it is a reason I no longer contribute financially or bother trying to improve articles to make them more neutral.Scottca075 (talk) 18:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Stop your threats, I am not violating any rules the edit I have made are appropriate and supported by real facts. Stop using your power as a moderator to limit the facts. Just because you do not agree with the changes made. I will adjust content as I see the need. If I find that content to be unbiased or misleading. Block me if you wish, I have contributed to Wikipedia for half my life I know how to stop the checks if people like your self continue to harass people making honest edits. I believe in facts not options CodingCanine (talk) 23:42, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The sources in that section are biased and misleading. Just because the source is well known does not mean they are correct. CodingCanine (talk) 23:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Please take some time to review the reliable sources guideline. As WP:SOURCETYPES states, "When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources." There is no evidence that the 6 high-quality academic sources in Special:Permalink/1074741187 are "biased and misleading".And to clarify, my edits to the Andrew Breitbart article were made in my capacity as an editor, not as an administrator. —  Newslinger  talk   09:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Controversial topic area alert
—  Newslinger  talk   21:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Welcome
Hello CodingCanine and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Andrew Breitbart, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —  Newslinger  talk   21:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I feel the Andrew Breitbart article violates Wikipedia's neutral viewpoint. I also feel you are backhandedly not assuming goodwill on CodingCanie's part by accusing him of article vandalism in a roundabout way. Scottca075 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)