User talk:Codrin Paul Oneci/sandbox

The article is clearly very informative and organized section relatively well. Although, at time it seems that there needs to be a sub-heading preceding some of the information i.e. when the writer mentions the different coefficient of transfers, perhaps it may be best to provide a subheading so the readers don't become lost in all the information.

To answer some questions, you could elaborate how real-world companies evacuate heat from nuclear reactors (as in give an example to reinforce your article).

Additionally, I feel that the use of an animated gif worked really well in illustrating the process of heat evacuation. Overall, the article is very informative but could be polished up a little more.

Gowilguo (talk) 14:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Wilson Guo

I think this article is very well organized and well written. I really like your use of the picture and I really like how you format the equations and use those in conjunction with the content.

However, I feel like this article is a little harder to understand for the casual reader, which completely makes sense because this is a hard topic. However, I would try to explain more in terms of what the variables mean in all the equations your introducing and what certain terms mean. For example, even in just the intro paragraph, there may be people who don't know what empirical means, and I would just take time to make your content, especially the introduction, more common reader friendly.

Rima Rebei

On the whole, this is a very good start in taking a complex subject and presenting it in a reference article format. At times, however, I think it merits a bit more clarification and discussion (remember that readers may not have any background in the subject), so it would be useful to include some practical information (such as the technology's application in the real world) as well as some explanation (such as for the information included in the table and equations). Also, are there additional (current) reference sources that you might include? The visuals are also terrific--just make sure that any images come from Wikimedia Commons (and are therefore free from copyright restrictions). Amyc29 (talk) 23:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)