User talk:Cody4375

Speedy deletion nomination of RHack
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as RHack, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. JNW (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JNW (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Given the similarity of your edit history to that of MitchHorn, a reading of WP:SOCKPUPPET may be appropriate. JNW (talk) 00:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to RHack. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Talk  00:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/MitchHorn for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Sven Manguard Talk  03:02, 18 October 2010 (UTC)