User talk:Cody Orme

May 2014
Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014 video game) because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Kirby: Triple Deluxe. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 17:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

ferret (talk) Hey Ferret, can you explain how anything I wrote was promotional and how was I using Wikipedia as a soapbox?


 * Mass efforts by members of this site to add their reviews to games is promotional in nature. You can visit the AN/I on this topic at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents -- ferret (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk) So how is IGN's review allowed up but ours isn't? That makes no sense.


 * Recommend you take it up with AN/I. You should also read WP:COI. IGN didn't add their own reviews and are deemed a reliable source. CGMagazine is not. -- ferret (talk) 17:24, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk) CGM has been around for four years, and is sold across Canada. Did you actually check the publication before removing anything? We were merely adding to what was already said. I'm sorry, I don't see how you can deem "Hardcore Gamer" as reliable, but CGM as not. We'd be happy to send you an issue if you'd like.


 * Again, I recommend reading WP:COI and visiting the AN/I discussion at Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents -- ferret (talk) 17:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

I did, however I cannot write anything as I have an autoblock now. I'm not trying to be confrontational, I'm just trying to make sense of it.
 * Wikipedia is based on reliable sources which have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. IGN has established itself in the industry as a major reliable source for video game news and reviews. Hardcore Gamer Magazine was founded by someone who has over 20 years experience in the games journalism industry. Not much discussion has been had on the reliability of Hardcore Gamer Magazine, but it does appear to be reliable. I'm not sure CGMag has really established itself in the industry at this time. Things that would show a reputation: having an independent reliable source write an article about CGMag and/or CGMag's staff, having the magazine or its writers win a recognized industry award, or having other independent reliable sources use CGMag as a source (I often see this when smaller publications get good scoops that larger pubs then have to pick up by citing the small publications). If a number of these things can be shown, then a discussion could be had at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources where we discuss new sources. If a new source is found reliable, it could then be used as a source throughout Wikipedia. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. --Odie5533 (talk) 17:45, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk) Thank you, you've been helpful. I actually have been cited by other sources. Just trying to find it now. One of our editors has worked in the industry for over 20 years as well. His name is Wayne Santos, and I will definitely bring up these points over on that link. I would also like to know if there is a contact for a complaint department. Looking over at what Ferret said in the other talk, I believe him taking pleasure in banning me for merely asking questions was pretty unprofessional.


 * AN/I would be the place to bring up a complaint if you have one about my behavior, but, I have never once mentioned banning or blocking you. You may be attributing statements by others to me. -- ferret (talk) 17:57, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

My apologies to (talk), this was the statement I was referring to. "Seems the block of Brendan resulted in Cody getting hit with an autoblock. It's fun how these things work out sometimes. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:36, 16 May 2014 (UTC)" Again, my apologies. As for our reputation, I've gathered some data, and will present it to the board that referred me to. But I cannot, because I am still blocked.


 * Ferret did not ban you (he can't ban people; he's not an admin). Sorry your first foray into Wikipedia has been so troublesome, but as you can imagine there are a lot of spammers that come on here, and continuing to add spam to articles after repeated warnings usually results in a block. If you want to discuss the comments of another user you should probably bring any evidence you have to the ANI thread Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. Before doing so, it might be a good idea to take a break from Wikipedia for at least 30 minutes or so and then re-read the comments, and keep in mind that most of the people here are not professional encyclopedia writers or encyclopedia editors, only unpaid volunteers. --Odie5533 (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk) (talk) Thank you for helping me through this. I'm not upset or anything. I'm just trying to figure this out. I don't really understand why I got a ban, I didn't post anything after you told me to stop. I understand you guys are mostly volunteers. I understand that because of that professionalism isn't always going to be great. But saying how it's fun that we got banned in a discussion I can't defend myself in is unprofessional as a volunteer or paid. But Since I can't write anywhere else at the moment, here are some links to work my editor Wayne Santos has done. He's worked in the industry for 20 years at places like IGN, Game Axis, and The Examiner. Here you go for proof. http://www.behance.net/Shoeless http://books.google.ca/books?id=DekDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA42&lpg=PA42&dq=wayne+santos+game+axis&source=bl&ots=pDXvZwE00X&sig=zIrDjptLoTL6uXcGHdlPTdUFhug&hl=en&sa=X&ei=wVN2U97EMNGiyATUjILYBw&ved=0CDkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=wayne%20santos%20game%20axis&f=false http://ca.ign.com/articles/2007/10/20/rock-band-ps3-hands-on http://www.cgmagonline.com/articles/editorials/microsoft-can-retake-north-america-now/

And another one of our writers write for a few different places deemed reputable by Wikipedia. http://www.joystiq.com/editor/brittany-vincent http://www.maximumpc.com/user/brittany_vincent http://www.cgmagonline.com/reviews/yaiba-ninja-gaiden-z-review/

Here's Phil Brown's Rotten Tomatoes link. He writes for The Globe and Mail. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/philip-brown/ http://www.cgmagonline.com/reviews/godzilla-2014-review/

As for links to other publications citing us... http://jin115.com/archives/51976243.html http://jin115.com/archives/52012383.html vidaextra.com rpgwatch.com bluesnews.com railgun.newz.dk kicktraq.com http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Nintendo-moechte-keine-Homo-Ehe-im-Spiel-Tomodachi-Life-2186464.html http://bindingofisaac.com/post/82762252439/thats-not-a-knife

And we are partners with Maker. And we are part of Magazines Canada. https://www.magazinescanada.ca/consumer?id=507


 * You actually were not directly blocked. When Brendon was blocked (As he continued to add links after several notices to stop), you were automatically blocked due to sharing IPs with him. I do not personally know all the details of how the autoblock works or how you would go about asking to be unblocked. -- ferret (talk) 19:32, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

(talk) Okay, thank you. Still though, I gave extensive information about how CGM is reputable, but I haven't heard anything back yet.

Cody Orme, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure