User talk:Codyhallga

November 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brian Kemp has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Brian Kemp was changed by Codyhallga (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884535 on 2018-11-13T16:43:18+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brian Kemp, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Longhair\talk 16:52, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Longhair\talk 17:04, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I am a member of the Kemp campaign and my agenda is to include historical and biographical information. Whoever cited negative news stories also had an agenda that apparently was not flagged. I will not make any further edits to the page, but I'd like to submit a formal complaint about this page. It's a coordinated hit job and it should not be allowed by Wikipedia. Obviously someone did a lot of editing to this page and it was accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyhallga (talk • contribs)
 * As I indicated, information will not be removed just because it portrays Gov.-elect Kemp negatively. Wikipedia has no control over how independent reliable source portray Gov.-elect Kemp.  If you want to argue on the article talk page that certain information is presented with undue weight or violates the Biographies of Living Persons policy, that's a valid avenue for you to take.  However, that will require you to work collaboratively with other editors, at least some of whom will probably have different views about what should be included than you do.  You can't just dictate what appears in the article. If collaboration is something you are willing to do, you can make another unblock request.  You may, however, find working at another project like Conservapedia more compatible with your views. 331dot (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)