User talk:Coemgenus/archive2007-3

Hancock
It is the normal practice on Wikipedia to respect the formatting conventions used by the previous authors of articles when it comes to footnotes, references, and other areas in which there are not strict formatting guidelines imposed by the Manual of Style. When you write your own articles, you get to choose the formats used. I have restored the original formatting that I used in creating the Hancock article. If you would like to reply, notwithstanding the orange box on your talk page, please either e-mail me or post it on my user page, because your talk page is not in my watchlist. Hal Jespersen 16:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate it that you are adding a lot of value to the article without riding roughshod on the formatting conventions I used. Thanks. I hope you are not TOO annoyed by the nitpicking corrections I have sprinkled in. Hal Jespersen 17:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comment. I understand your citation preferences, and I'm just as nitpicky about changes to Calvin Coolidge, which I largely wrote.  I'd like to expand the intro paragraph on Hancock a bit, and then submit it for Featured Article review.  Is there anything else you think we should fix first?  Coemgenus 18:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I just made a minor modification to the description of the Battle of Antietam (because I was recently a visitor at Antietam and paid a lot of attention to that part of the battlefield). If you would like to submit this article for FA review, you are welcome to do so, however, I make it a policy to not participate in such activities, either as a reviewer or a nominator. I derive my enjoyment from writing the articles, not defending the content, style, and format from anonymous reviewers. Someone recently nominated my Battle of Antietam article for FA status and it took quite a lot of my time arguing about issues that really made no difference to the article at all. Some of the reviewers think that by reading the article and writing a couple of paragraphs that they then have ascendancy in the decision-making process about the way the article is constructed and presented. But go ahead if you want. The only possible criticism that I can foresee is that the preponderance of the footnotes are from a single reference, which is something some reviewers object to. Hal Jespersen 21:56, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand your comment about Featured Articles, but I think the process does help a good article get wider exposure so, for me anyway, that makes it worth it. I agree with you about the problem of using a single source.  The problem is that while Hancock's military exploits are well-chronicled, the rest of his life is covered in only one scholarly biography, as far as I can tell.  Maybe I'll look around for some other works.  Coemgenus 23:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

my RFA
Thank you for supporting my RFA. I hope I will live up to your expectation. Let me know if you need any help, or I make any mistake. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

French Republican Calendar
I award you a template for the most amaz(z?)ing templatry ever seen. 68.39.174.238 07:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
 * Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
 * Join our mailing list
 * Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up!  Cbrown1023   talk   02:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 GAC backlog elimination drive
A new elimination drive of the backlog at Good article candidates  will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :GAReview underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 23:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Roosevelt Mall
Roosevelt Mall, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Roosevelt Mall satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Roosevelt Mall and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Roosevelt Mall during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 22:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Reagan FAC
Hi there. I just wanted to thank you for registering the 10th support on Ronald Reagan's FAC page! Best, Happyme22 22:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nicaea.jpg
Dear Coemgenus, what is the source and where is found this image of thw icon you uploaded? Thank you. --  pvasiliadis 06:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It's been a while since I uploaded it. I have no idea where I found it.  Coemgenus 14:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Coemengus. Thnx for supporting my article. Without your comments it would be still languishing, unread, unsupported and unnoticed. It must have broke the record for the longest time spent in FAC without gaining any support hehe. ;) Raymond Palmer 12:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad I could help! I was perplexed by the lack of comments -- even an "oppose" would've made more sense than just ignoring it (although I can't really think of any reason to oppose).  Congrats on the FA.  Coemgenus 13:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

"It should be noted that"
I'm sorry, I just realised that I did not reply to your kind message of support. Thank you. --John 16:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Calvin Coemgenus Commons
Hi Coemgenus,

I've come across the image:CoolidgeAmherst.png that you've uploaded in January. Two quick questions: First, do you know the source of the image? The description indicates you got it from some book... As I've now uploaded it to the Commons, it'd be great if the source information was complete. And the second question is just about Commons: Could you upload future images directly there? That saves us others quite some time of reuploading. Thanks in advance, Ibn Battuta 18:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know the source of the image. I copied it from a book that did not give attribution.  I believe the book was the Fuess monograph that I cite in the references of Calvin Coolidge.  All I can say is that, by virtue of its age (before 1923,) it is in the public domain.  I will upload directly to the Commons in the future. Coemgenus 18:27, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Rating ratings
Hello Coemgenus, if I'm not mistaken you rated John Redmond with "Start" status?. Should it not be a "B" rating? I wonder what the bsis for the "Start" rating was, it had been considerably expanded from its original "Start" level. I notice ratings differ between articles quite considerably, where content and quality are fairly equal. Greetings Osioni 21:41, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The article does seem quite expanded since I rated it seven months ago. I don't know if there's a procedure to change these things once they're assigned.  Seems like a 'B-class' now, I guess, but anything under GA is pretty subjective.  Coemgenus 23:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Philly meetup #5
Please look at Meetup/Philadelphia 5 and give your input about the next meet-up. Thank you. This automated notice was delivered to you because you are on the WikiProject Philadelphia/Philadelphia meet-up invite list. BrownBot 21:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5
To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC).

Stuarts
I'll try to look at James II by the end of Friday. Funny you should write, because I was going to write to you to ask you to look at Charles II, which is going through FAR. I've not quite finished it yet, but it could do with a fresh set of eyes. DrKiernan 08:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's great. I'll support. One thing: I think the sentence "In 1679, after the Popish Plot (see below), Charles sent James to Scotland to suppress an uprising and oversee royal government there." could be dropped, or moved down. Relating to the later event early on breaks up the narrative and introduces the reader to the Popish plot before being aware of any of its details. DrKiernan 12:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * According to Manual of Style and Image use policy the default is generally preferred. I don't think it's a particularly big issue myself. I've only changed the images that were fairly close to 180px. I've left the double portraits and portraits of Belloc and Macaulay alone because they do look better at their current sizes. The only thing I would say if you decide to revert them, is remember that everyone will be looking at them on different monitors, different resolutions, and different settings, so what looks best on your monitor may not look good on someone else's. DrKiernan 06:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

W. A. Speck, "James II and VII (1633–1701)", Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, Sept. 2004; online edn, May 2006, accessed 15 October, 2007.

Meetup/Philadelphia 5
 You're invited to the

Philadelphia-area Wikipedia Meetup

November 11, 2007

Time: 5:00 pm

Location: Buca Di Beppo, 258 South 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102. 'RSVP (view/edit this template'') You have received this message because you are on the invite list, you may change your invite options via that link. BrownBot 22:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the December 2007 issue. Dr. Cash 01:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Mantua Junction
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mantua Junction, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mantua Junction is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mantua Junction, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
  Click there to open your card! → → → Dearest , Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 137 supports, 22 opposes, and 5 neutrals. Your kind words of support are very much appreciated and I look forward to proving you right. I would like to give special thanks to The_undertow  and  Phoenix-wiki  for their co-nominations. Thank you again and best regards.  Lara  ❤  Love  20:23, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Credits: This RFA thanks was inspired by  The Random Editor 's RFA thanks which was inspired by Phaedriel 's RFA thanks.

Somewhat-Belated RfA Thanks :-)
  Tapadh Leibh (Thank You)...  ...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful  RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.

I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.

If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me. (Oh, and if you hate RfA Thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you for deleting it ;-))

And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me <font color="E0CCDB">climbing the Reichstag, now would you?

Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!) <font face="comic sans ms"><font color="E4D5E8">Kathryn NicDhàna </b> <font color="E4D5E8">♫ <font color="FCD73F">♦ <font color="E4D5E8">♫ 

<font color="#000000"> This RfA thanks inspired by Neranei's, which was inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.

Potential SPAM query
Hi Coemgenus. I want to respond to your question regarding my link to the Waddell painting in the White House Entrance Hall article. The work was commissioned by the White House Historical Association to recreate the vivid Louis Tiffany screen in color. Though Waddell is a living artist and accepts commissions, the image I've linked to is the only color image of the Tiffany screen. Waddell has been commissioned by several historic preservation organizations to recreate historic interiors. I have been unable to receive permission from the White House Historical Association to upload this (and other) images to wiki, or wiki commons, so this seemed quite worth it to me. I am not the artist, a friend, or associate of him. I read of his work in a White House Historical Association article on their website. 207.172.222.5 (talk) 03:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Whoop, forgot to sign in.CApitol3 (talk) 03:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Jamess ii excellent article
Good job on James ii. Sorry I wasn't around when it was up for FA to chip in, but looks like you had things in good order. There's a colour piccy of Turrene here if you're interested. Cheers for now. Raymond Palmer (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 00:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Closed?
No, I'm not giving up that easy ;) I no longer wanted to use my real name, (i wanted more anonymity) so I started a new account (I told Kirill, so it's all in the open).

I now go under the name Rebel Redcoat.

Bit of a misnomer really: I was never a redcoat nor a rebel, just a typical wikipedian who drinks too much, hehehe

Thanks for your words, signing off for the first time as the Rebel Redcoat 03:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC) :)

Admin
Hi. I just wondered if you'd consider letting me nominate you for adminship, as you seem experienced enough. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Featured list nomination
Thank you for the kind words regarding List of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by time in office, but I must note that DLJessup actually added more justices than I did (although you are correct that I was the creator and did add a large number of justices). OCNative (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)