User talk:Coesegue

March 2020
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of territorial disputes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 14:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

hi

i was reply in your talk page

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to List of territorial disputes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. —— SN  54129  15:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC) This problem is solved. The source is provided. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Patient_Zero#iri/uae

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of territorial disputes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —— SN  54129  16:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a reliable source
see this link.