User talk:Coffeeandsmoke

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queens Night Market (June 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Home Lander was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Queens Night Market and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Queens Night Market, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Queens_Night_Market Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Home_Lander&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Queens_Night_Market reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Home Lander (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 02:38, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed QueensNightMarket to Coffeeandsmoke
globally renamed QueensNightMarket to CoffeeandsmokeDlohcierekim (talk) 03:12, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

COI
Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below.
 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Although you had a list of references, they were not in-line, so I have no idea what fact each was supposedly verifying, which is what is needed. Just dumping a list of sites mentioning the market isn't enough, even if they are good-quality sources, each claim needs to be verified. Without that, it's just a list of unsupported claims and looks like promotion.
 * You haven't linked to existing articles either, such as New York City, Flushing Meadows–Corona Park
 * Even if your source is generally acceptable, such as the NY Post or WSJ, if they are just quoting claims by Wang, that's not acceptable. Claims about annual/nightly numbers of visitors need a source unconnected to the market to have any credibility
 * Sources like WSJ that need a subscription should be marked as such in the reference template using the parameter |url-access=subscription
 * I cannot tell whether the market meets our notability criteria because without proper in-line references, I don't know which of the statements are verifiable and which are just unsourced or sourced only to Wang or other COI sources


 * Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I've made these changes, please check and ask if you don't understand any of them. They are a mixture of ref formatting, MoS and toning down non-neutral wording Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:47, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queens Night Market has been accepted
 Queens Night Market, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Missvain (talk) 23:42, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Queens_Night_Market help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.