User talk:Cogitari

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 12:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Electronic_trial_master_file_(eTMF)
Hello, Cogitari! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Electronic_trial_master_file_(eTMF). You can read it at WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. Huon (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 14:25, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 14:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Electronic trial master file (eTMF), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! TheOneSean &#124; Talk to me 17:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=554368590 your edit] to Trial master file may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=571551280 your edit] to Trial master file may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * human use are specified in the document 'ICH Good Clinical Practices,' published in 1997 by the ICH .  Third, the TMF Reference Model artifact names contain characters such as '/', '  ', '  ', which are not allowed in many filesystem naming schemes.  Fourth, with respect to the use of the

Capitalization
In this edit you seem to indicate that the lowercase words in the heading were due to a typo, which was not the case. In WP, we reserve caps for proper nouns; see MOS:CAPS. Headings and titles use sentence case, not title case, in WP. And words like "standard" that may be capitalized in some sources will not usually be in WP; only if they are part of a term that is consistently capitalized in sources, which these are not, in the section in question. Dicklyon (talk) 22:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Seems reasonable. Along those lines, the subject of this article, Electronic Trial Master File, (eTMF) should be capitalized for two reasons: One, it represents a unique 'thing' and isn't a common noun; Two, it helps the reader to understand the source of the acronym 'eTMF'  Your thoughts? Cogitari (talk) 14:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC)