User talk:Coin945/Archive 7

DYK for Piposh (2019 video game)
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 00:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Rugrats Adventure Game
Thank you for creating the article for the above game. It was one of my absolutely favorites growing up. I had actually installed an emulator version to my laptop, but it was unfortunately wiped when I had to get it repaired. Hope you are doing well. Aoba47 (talk) 22:49, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Haha I'm glad that my work here on Wikipedia means something to someone! I never played the game growing up, but watching a Let's Play on YouTube I can easily picture it being an essential part of my childhood if my parents had bought it instead of Carmen Sandiego's Great Chase Through Time, Madeline European Adventures, and The Cluefinders games. I'm sure you can always get the game back. :) I'm doing well, thanks Aoba47. There's a few projects I've got my sights on getting to GA (even though that sounds a bit scary) so that is likely the goal of 2019 - to get either Pilgrim: Faith as a Weapon, Tajemnica Statuetki, Madeline (video game series), Disney's Animated Storybook, Carmen Sandiego's Great Chase Through Time, Where in North Dakota is Carmen Sandiego? or Piposh there. What about you?--Coin945 (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I will probably try to get the game back in the future. I will also check m external hard-drive to see if I saved it. Ironically enough, last year, I had considered starting a YouTube channel on older video games, including a play-through of the Rugrats Adventure Game. Those all sound like excellent projects. I am currently revising some of GAs to bring them through the FAC process. I do not have any plans for GANs in the future though, but it would be nice to do something completely different. Maybe I will do another video game article, because I have only brought one through the GAN process in the past. I have thought about working on the Anastasia: Adventures with Pooka and Bartok article (as it was one of my childhood favorites), but the coverage on it is extremely limited (at least when I searched for sources). On an unrelated note, I watched some YouTube videos of Friends: The One with All the Trivia. It is 100% a cash-in, and such an odd release lol, yet I have watched several videos on it lol. Aoba47 (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Wow, if you ever decide to do your YouTube review channel, I'll be sure to watch. :) As you can probably see, I've gone back to Anastasia: Adventures with Pooka and Bartok and touched it up with an many sorcs as I could find; perhaps that extra coverage warrants a GA article? (It could be plumped up with some more background information on Fox Interactive and Motion Works). Haha I watched some YouTube clips of that Friends game too while I was working on the article. Crazily enough, while it looks like it was made in two hours, there's a tonne of coverage on it. Anyway, the game I'm about to improve is The Fool's Errand. It's free to download and extremely fun and brain-challenging. Perhaps this project could be of interest to you?--Coin945 (talk) 05:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have been thinking about starting a YouTube channel on video game analysis. I have a Master of Arts in English Language and Literature, and I think it would be fun to carry over my literary analysis skills into video games. I would honestly only make YouTube videos for fun and to develop and refine video-editing skills to expand my resume. The Anastasia: Adventures with Pooka and Bartok article looks great! Thank you for expanding it so much. I would make sure to format the references properly (for instance, the first reference is a bare URL), and replace MobyGames with something else as that source is not considered reliable. Maybe, one day in the future, I will help out with the Friends: The One with All the Trivia article. It is such an odd game to me, although I would probably still enjoy playing it lol. I will definitely check out The Fool's Errand; it sounds really interesting! Aoba47 (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Tajemnica Statuetki

 * Hi Coin, I've removed a large chunk of text about the game's creator from the article; please see its talk page. I noticed Adrian Chmielarz has an article, maybe some of the text and sources could be useful there. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:25, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I've now finished my c/e; I have a few suggestions for progress:


 * The "Reception" section particularly could use some cleanup; I noticed that several sources are used multiple times there. Merging these sentences would reduce the section significantly. The same goes for "Legacy";
 * You could remove or refactor some of the less significant and lower-quality sources –&#32;unfortunately I don't understand Polish so I can't help discern which sources these might be.
 * Some of the text I removed to the article's talk page might be useful in other articles (see my earlier comments above).
 * Anyway I'm done here; I hope the c/e is useful for you and helps you further develop the article. i found it an interesting read. Good luck and cheers,  Baffle☿gab  02:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the copyedit. I am optimistic that this article is closer to GA than it ever has before. Do you have any final comments on how I should proceed to tighten the article up further and prepare it for nom?--Coin945 (talk) 21:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Yes, I forgot to add that the leader could be expanded to four paragraphs to more fully summarise the body text. Good luck with your planned GA nom; it's an interesting subject. Cheers,  Baffle☿gab  06:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego 2019 logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego 2019 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Pilgrim: Faith as a Weapon
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Pilgrim: Faith as a Weapon has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

You will notice that I have added a "clarify" tag in the Gameplay section: "regardless of where the player is,[clarification needed] Disc 1 must be inserted every time they boot up the game." This is unclear.

I have "hidden" text in the Reception section that is not specific to this game, where the Google translation was gibberish and did not support the text, or where the sites would not load so the text could not be verified. You can see this in Edit mode. I draw your attention to this Wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Sources which deals with sources considered "reliable" (by consensus) in video game articles. Many of the sources you cite in this section come from mobygames.com which is not considered reliable. I notice there is lengthy discussion on the article's talk page about the issue of reliability, so perhaps you are aware of the problem with this site. These will need to be deleted or more "reliable" sources found before the article will pass GA, I suspect. On the whole, the Reception section is far too long, in my opinion. As often happens with these articles many editors continue to add reviews they have unearthed, important or not, in a seeming quest to add absolutely everything ever written about the subject. This just results in a bloated, unreadable article.

I suspect one of the problems you have encountered with this article is there are very few reviews in English. But having to rely on Google translations of articles in other languages creates its own set of issues. A few I looked at were basically gibberish and would not pass the "reliability" test. I don't know if a GA reviewer would accept this type of review.

Hopefully you know or can find another editor with experience with these issues who can help you resolve these problems.

Best of luck,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to copyedit my article and for providing feedback to help me improve it. Your comments are very valid, and in particular your note about the "seeming quest to add absolutely everything ever written about the subject" definitely speaks to me, as this is trap I often fall into. I suppose it's difficult to locate sources for topics such as this so I generally add everything I can find, and then trim off the fat at the end of the process. But I'll keep watch of it going into the future. In terms of the reliability of the sources, many of these non-English sources haven't yet been assessed, so if this article was to be reviewed for GAN, that would be a great opportunity to put these sources to the test. I think this article is a bit off a GAN for now, but I'm glad to see it's heading in the right direction. :)--Coin945 (talk) 22:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * In other news, did you have any comments on the subject matter of the article?--Coin945 (talk) 22:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No comments on the subject matter, really. It is certainly a completely different video game from any other whose article I have copy edited. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Confirm Involvement in WikiProject Disney
Hello Coin945! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the  tag. Happy editing! GeekInParadise (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Improvements
Hi there, do you have anything that could improve Shadow: War of Succession? 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:EC9B:65F6:747A:9E1C (talk) 01:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The article has a lot of citations, but not a lot of content. Thanks, if you can help! 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:8DD:99BD:2EFB:DF58 (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stratogon Entertainment


The article Stratogon Entertainment has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "CORPDEPTH failure."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  SITH   (talk)   21:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Re:Adventure articles
Hey! Just wanted to thank you for all the hard work you've done expanding Wikipedia's adventure game coverage. It's really amazing just how many articles you've made in such a short time. You even created Secrets of the Luxor, which I've been thinking about starting for over a year! And an especially big thank-you for the help on Faust (video game)—some of those sources you dug up are things I never would have found on my own. I plan to take that article to GAN in the next month or two, after I finish expanding it. Anyway, here's a barnstar for your tireless contributions! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chopper (video game)


The article Chopper (video game) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TarkusAB talk 12:50, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Johnny Mnemonic
Hey Coin if you want to contribute with the Johnny Mnemonic draft you can also help add some things into the body. Especially if they are non-English sources. I can see this being created with the same intent as Phantasmagoria (video game) as well as possibly needing something special to be done to show the gameplay. GamerPro64 19:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Following up I also cannot use some of the sources you provided in the talk page due to not having access to them. GamerPro64  20:13, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * In general I'm not a huge fan of editing people's drafts, but with your permission I will gladly add some meat.
 * (Just out of interest, what do you mean by "with the same intent as Phantasmagoria (video game)"?)--Coin945 (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What I mean is I want to match the style to Phantasmagoria and maybe try to make it a Featured Article. The very least a Good Article. GamerPro64  03:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Beat Hazard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beat Hazard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beat Hazard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 18:46, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rugrats All Grown Up comparison.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rugrats All Grown Up comparison.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to project revival
Dear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak   (speak)  16:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yearn2Learn
Hello, Coin945,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Yearn2Learn, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click   button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  TT me 00:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, I request this is sent to WP:AFD instead. Kind regards, Coin945.--Coin945 (talk) 01:28, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/El Tesoro de Isla Alcachofa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Quest for the Code for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quest for the Code is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quest for the Code until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dbaza's Diabetes Education for Kids until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 05:35, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

RE:Gry Online
Great to hear that you got Gry accepted as a reliable source! I've used it a few times in the past, but maybe I should look into it more. I axed that particular Gry reference on Igor because it was part of the Gry encyclopedia, and I assumed that it was (like with Giant Bomb) a user-generated section of the site. It doesn't seem like Igor was ever released in Poland, so I wasn't sure what else it could've been but an unofficial thing created by fans. If it's actually editorial content, I'll be sure to re-add it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:36, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow, what a wonderful message to wake up to here in Australia. Thank you for your generous words, and I look forward to working with the WP:VG family to continue improving coverage of this fascinating industry with a rich multicultural history.--Coin945 (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Bracken Tor moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bracken Tor, does not have enough sources or confirmed information to remain published. Please attempt to at least begin the currently empty sections, and don't forget to use reliable sources.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Adibou
Hello, Coin945,

Thank you for creating Adibou.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thank you for your new article on Adibou."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ant Raid


The article Ant Raid has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to fail GNG/WP:NSOFTWARE. Metacritic as the only ref is not enough in light of WP:VG standards either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hank Hazard


The article Hank Hazard has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to fail GNG/WP:NSOFTWARE. Metacritic as the only ref is not enough in light of WP:VG standards either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Infinity Field


The article Infinity Field has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to fail GNG/WP:NSOFTWARE. Metacritic as the only ref is not enough in light of WP:VG standards either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:25, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pixel Defenders Puzzle


The article Pixel Defenders Puzzle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Seems to fail GNG/WP:NSOFTWARE. Metacritic as the only ref is not enough in light of WP:VG standards either."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:26, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Oregon Trail (2011 game).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Oregon Trail (2011 game).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Regnum (video game)


The article Regnum (video game) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lacks significant, reliable coverage on the subject. Fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 19:07, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Cat people and dog people for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cat people and dog people is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cat people and dog people& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 20:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Berlin Connection
Hi Coin945,

I feel honored — I just came across — that you put up a Berlin Connection (BC) Wikipedia page and already putting together such an amount of sources (some of them I never had seen before). I am Eku Wand author, designer, producer and publisher (via eku interactive) of the CD-ROM Adventure-Thriller Berlin Connection (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Connection).

How can I help you to improve the quality of your article? I can see some mistakes immediately starting from wrong spelling of my name: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eku_Wand and the wrong mentioning of my former multimedia company Pixelpark: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixelpark (which now is: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digitas_Pixelpark).

I could help finding relevant links for you in German or English language (such as: https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arthistoricum/catalog/book/265 ; https://books.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/arthistoricum/reader/download/265/265-17-77884-1-10-20170523.pdf), other sources (such as registry of Berlin Connection in the German National Library) and upload proper high resolution cover shots etc. Another English weblink with wrong release date (proper release year is 1998): https://macintoshgarden.org/games/berlin-connection

I could also help finding another German Wikipedia editor to write the german Wikipedia page first and then go back and forth with you on syncing both sides? Let me know.

As I am not an advanced Wikipedia editor (and not good in proper formatting either) please advise on how I can help without violating Wikipedia netiquette but improving the article's quality and importance on scale!?

… you can also write to mailto:mail@ekuwand.com as I am unsure if this is the right way to get in contact with you in here. Sorry.

Regards Eku

ekuwand 13:16, 29 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekuwand (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, it's nice to meet you! While I am interested in creating articles on 90s/00s adventure games, I do not have the time to develop this article any further at the moment. Particularly as I do not speak German, it would be an additional challenge. I think your suggestion is a good one - to contcat a German editor to write an article, and for them to translate it to English.


 * Kind regards,
 * --Coin945 (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Alright — I will proceed as suggested. Thank you for your feedback.

--Ekuwand (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Bracken Tor concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Bracken Tor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bracken Tor


Hello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bracken Tor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

"Italpinas Euroasian Design and Eco-Development Corporatio" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Italpinas Euroasian Design and Eco-Development Corporatio. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC  678  15:14, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Tajemnica Statuetki for GA
Impressive work, have you cosnidered WP:GAN? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you for your kind words! I considered GAN back when I first worked on it. I haven't been active on Wikipedia in a while and don't really have the time to push it to GA. But if you wanted to go through the process I'm happy to support you. --Coin945 (talk) 01:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Kajko and Kokosz (video game series)
I am about to write an article about the first one and I noticed this article of yours. I think it should be merged to Kayko and Kokosh, as there is no official 'series'. The games were made by at least two if not more different companies, and the grouping is unofficial. The content can be preserved in the article for the comics which are the main franchise, but I don't think the list makes sense as a stand alone article. If you reply here, please ping me. Cheers,--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
 * PS. Done with my article Kajko and Kokosz (video game), do take a look, I am sure it can use some c/e or such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:166087-wooden-ships-iron-men-dos-front-cover.png
Thanks for uploading File:166087-wooden-ships-iron-men-dos-front-cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:E.X. Troopers logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:E.X. Troopers logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Les Manley
You got it.

Les Manley in: Search for the King and Les Manley in: Lost in L.A.. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Living books sources text
https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/multimedia-schools-are-encouraged-to-invest-in-flexibility-1421026.html :

LYNNE CURRY Tuesday 7 June 1994 00:02

MICROSOFT, the worldwide leader in software for personal computers, says its education CD- ROMs will never replace books. Their aim is to make learning fun and accessible.

The prospect of interactive CD- ROMs (computer discs with read- only memories), responding to prompts from the user, would have sounded fantastic a few years ago. Now titles have been developed to fit the National Curriculum.

The 2,000 paintings in the permanent collection at the National Gallery in London have been captured on CD-ROM, along with information about the paintings and artists. Microsoft, the creators, also have a title on musical instruments, developed with Dorling Kindersley, a specialist publisher of reference books. A 28-volume encyclopaedia, Encarta, was released last year.

The growing list of educational titles joins the quasi-educational material, designed to inject fun into learning, or vice-versa. Distributors Softline are promoting Broderbund's Living Books, animated stories for children. Words or sentences can be played individually and the computer reads and spells word aloud as they are highlighted. Multilingual versions are included, and a click of the mouse will change the language.

The Government is encouraging schools to invest. 'When you think about what the employees of the future are going to have to do and the flexibility that will be required, multimedia is the way it's going,' said a spokeswoman for the government-funded National Council for Educational Technology. The NCET says there is an onus on schools to make sure they know how to use new technology and how to get the best for their money, and publishes information sheets to help head teachers. Schools can apply for help towards buying equipment through the Gest scheme (grants for education support and training).

Paul Tollet, consumer business manager for Microsoft, points out that many CDs are electronic books. 'They are done in way that's more fun and more interesting, and a lot of the information is more accessible.' Though a different experience altogether from sitting under a tree with a book, where the birdsong comes spontaneously rather than from the click of a mouse.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-04-21-fi-48662-story.html :

‘Ham’ on ROM : Deal Will Put Dr. Seuss Books on Computer Discs By AMY HARMON April 21, 1994 12 AM TIMES STAFF WRITER

Audrey Geisel had one requirement for the multitude of multimedia firms vying to license her late husband’s work over the past year: “That cat had to be that cat. Down to the last whisker.”

Wednesday, the 72-year-old widow of Theodor Geisel--known to generations of children as Dr. Seuss--said she had granted the rights to create interactive versions of such classics as “The Cat in the Hat,” “Green Eggs and Ham” and “Horton Hatches the Egg” to Living Books, a joint venture between Geisel’s longtime publisher, Random House, and Broderbund, the leading publisher of children’s software.

In the scramble among multimedia developers to gobble up rights to intellectual property for translation to the new medium, the Dr. Seuss books were among the most hotly contested. The author’s 48 children’s books, which began in 1937 with “And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street,” are among the best-known literary properties ever licensed for multimedia and will probably help drive future deals.

“It was not an easy negotiation,” said Random House Chairman Alberto Vitale, who had long yearned to turn the Seuss books into CD-ROMs. Terms were not disclosed, but a source familiar with the deal said it was “well into the seven figures.”

Orchestrated by the ICM talent agency, a parade of software firms including Microsoft, Paramount Interactive and Activision trekked out to visit Geisel near her La Jolla home last year, armed with personal computers, CD-ROM drives and the best multimedia pitch they could muster.

They found no pushover. Since the author died in 1991, Audrey Geisel, who as chief executive of Dr. Seuss Enterprises owns all rights to his work, has been a fierce guardian of its artistic integrity.

“I worried that the quality would hold up. . . and that it be absolutely line-proof to the books,” she said. But Geisel said she was never uncertain about whether to enter the brave new world of CD-ROM with her husband’s much-beloved rhymes and illustrations. “This is a new form of communication that never existed before. And that was what Ted was all about.”

After producing a prototype, Living Books nearly lost out, despite Geisel’s desire to honor her husband’s 50-year association with Random House. “They had a bad hair day, a bad CD-ROM day, who knows,” Geisel said. But she gave them a second chance and, Geisel said, they came through.

Living Books come on CD-ROMs, which look like music compact discs except they hold text, video and animation in addition to sound. Played on a device hooked up to a computer, CD-ROMs hold 400 times the data of a typical computer floppy disk.

In the Living Book titles already on the market, such as “Just Grandma and Me,” each page of the book is displayed on the computer screen. Each character has a voice, and when children click on different objects, the objects respond. Living Books won’t say which Dr. Seuss book it will do first, but the first is scheduled to go on sale early next year. Will Dr. Seuss’ immortal rhymes be altered to suit the children of the Information Age?

“I think the children would say, ‘That’s not the way it goes,’ ” Geisel said. “ ‘I meant what I said and I said what I meant. . .’ ”

When she couldn’t remember the rest, a listener filled in: “An elephant’s faithful 100 percent.”

“See?” Geisel said. “You don’t mess around with that.”

https://www.nytimes.com/1993/09/11/business/company-news-random-house-children-s-books-headed-for-pc-s.html :

COMPANY NEWS; Random House Children's Books Headed for PC's

By Andrea Adelson

Sept. 11, 1993

Credit...The New York Times Archives See the article in its original context from September 11, 1993, Section 1, Page 39

Broderbund Software Inc. and Random House Inc. agreed yesterday to start a joint venture to produce electronic children's books to be read on personal computers.

The new venture, called Living Books, is one of the first alliances between dominant companies in their respective fields. It will permit Broderbund, a leading publisher of consumer software, to create electronic versions of the vast library of children's titles published by Random House, a New York-based publisher owned by the privately held Advance Publications. Broderbund and Random House declined to discuss financial details.

"We're at the beginning of a revolution," Alberto Vitale, Random House's chairman and chief executive, said in an interview. "It changes the way a new generation will learn, think and entertain themselves."

Electronic books played on computers offer animated illustrations with sound effects, and users can activate objects on their screens or alternate among English, Spanish and Japanese text and audio. More Deals Expected

Michael Wallace, a software analyst for UBS Securities, said the Living Books partnership "gives Broderbund access to a lot of content and makes it easier and quicker for them to come to market."

He predicted there would be more such marriages as computer makers, movie studios and publishers converge to create new electronics products. Still, CD-ROM disks made up just 10 percent of $750 million in consumer software expected to be sold this year, analysts said.

Electronic books are published on what are known as CD-ROM disks, for read-only memory compact disks, which are played on systems now being integrated into PC's. The market for CD-ROM disks has exploded in the last year from 22 titles in April 1992 to about 400 currently, said Ann Stephens, president of PC Data, a market research firm that compiles a monthly index of top-selling software titles.

Nearly 70 percent of the CD-ROM titles are either games or educational, she said. "It's growing all over, but educational software is the only area where it has more than a toehold," she added.

Two multimedia books published in the last year by Broderbund, "Just Grandma and Me" and "Arthur's Teacher Trouble," are among the top 10 best-selling CD-ROM's nationally. The company, based in Novato, Calif., has two more titles due out shortly. Other CD-ROM Publishers

Other CD-ROM publishers include Electronic Arts, Compton New Media, Microsoft, Knowledge Adventure and Virgin Games, whose "Seventh Guest" game is the third best-selling software program in the nation.

Broderbund's stock soared yesterday, gaining $3.75, to $41, in Nasdaq trading.

Mr. Vitale of Random House said he expected Living Books, which is to start operations in January, to publish up to 10 electronic titles next year. Each one costs "hundreds of thousands of dollars" to develop, he said.

Despite retail prices of up to $60 a title, Mr. Vitale expects a ready market. "A kid can play hours upon hours with one," he said.

One of the venture's obvious strengths is its ability to tap each company's existing distribution network. Although software is not stocked by most book sellers, Mr. Vitale predicts that will change. "Book stores will inexorably get into electronic product," he said.

Electronic book sales are expected to grow as more PC's are equipped with CD-ROM players.

A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 11, 1993, Section 1, Page 39 of the National edition with the headline: COMPANY NEWS; Random House Children's Books Headed for PC's.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1996-08-26-fi-37811-story.html :

Kids’ Software Picks

Aug. 26, 1996 12 AM

With thousands of titles out there, it can be a daunting experience to augment a collection of educational software with the confidence that you’ve made the right choices. If you consider these stellar titles first, you’ll be certain to make at least a few picks that both you and your child will be happy with.

Company: ADAM Software Title: Nine Month Miracle Subject/Age range: Reference/3 and up Phone: (800) 408-2326

Company: Broderbund Software Title: Myst Subject/Age range: Fantasy Discovery/8 and up Phone: (800) 474-8840

Company: Broderbund Software Title: Kid Pix Studio Subject/Age range: Creative arts/3-12 Phone: (800) 474-8840

Company: Broderbund Software Title: Living Books series Subject/Age range: Early reading/5-9 Phone: (800) 474-8840

Company: Broderbund Software Title: Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego? Series Subject/Age range: Problem solving/7-17 Phone: (800) 474-8840

Company: Claris Title: Hypercard Subject/Age range: Project building/7 and up Phone: (800) 325-2747

Company: Edmark Title: Thinkin’ Things Collection Subject/Age range: Varied drill and practice/4-8 Phone: (800) 362-2890

Company: Grollier Title: Multimedia Encyclopedia Subject/Age range: Reference/8 and up Phone: (800) 285-4534 Company: Learning Company Title: Treasure Math series Subject/Age range: Math drill and practice/5-10 Phone: (800) 852-2255 Company: Learning Company Title: Reader Rabbit series Subject/Age range: Reading, language development/3-10 Phone: (800) 852-2255

Company: Maxis Title: Sim City series Subject/Age range: Project building/10 and up Phone: (800) 336-2947

Company: MECC Title: Oregon/Amazon Trail series Subject/Age range: Adventure/10 and up Phone: (800) 685-6322

Company: Microsoft Title: Encarta ’96 Subject/Age range: Reference/8 and up Phone: (800) 426-9400

Company: Videodiscovery Title: Science Sleuths Subject/Age range: Problem solving/10 and up Phone: (800) 548-3472

Company: Voyager Title: Planetary Taxi Subject/Age range: Reference, Problem solving/8 and up Phone: (800) 446-2001

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/09/11/business/broderbund-casts-itself-as-a-studio.html :

Broderbund Casts Itself as a Studio

By Glenn Rifkin

Sept. 11, 1995

Credit...The New York Times Archives See the article in its original context from September 11, 1995, Section D, Page 7

Nestled in the parched hills of Marin County, just north of San Francisco, Broderbund Software Inc. doesn't conjure up visions of a Hollywood studio. But Harry Wilker, the company's senior vice president and creative director, could easily pass for one of those high-powered studio moguls constantly on the prowl for that winning formula: a compelling idea and the talent to produce it.

Broderbund (pronounced BROOD-er-bund) -- a leader in the $1 billion consumer software market -- is competing with the likes of the Walt Disney Company and the Microsoft Corporation for animators, writers and producers to make electronic entertainment products.

For the last year or so, Broderbund has had an interactive CD-ROM blockbuster -- "Myst," an addictive, surrealistic game. But in an industry where change is constant and smaller competitors produce copycat programs at dizzying speed, Broderbund -- which is Danish for brotherhood -- is adapting. Fast. Its marketing strategy has gone from laid back to aggressive.

With the Internet and on-line services likely to deliver competitive programming soon, Broderbund is working to offer its trademark educational entertainment on line. It is also preparing its first television advertising campaign.

A 15-year-old company with just $160 million in revenue and $25 million in earnings, Broderbund has become such a favorite on Wall Street that its shares closed at $72.50 on Friday (its low over the last 12 months was $24.375), giving it a market capitalization of $1.86 billion.

Keith E. Benjamin, a technology stock analyst with Robertson, Stephens & Company, estimates a 30 percent growth rate for Broderbund for the next few quarters.

In July, Broderbund bought the Learning Company, a leading education software maker, for $440 million. Mr. Benjamin said the deal "puts Broderbund in one of the strongest competitive positions" in a growing industry.

"Myst" has dominated the software best-seller lists for 18 months and has sold 1.5 million copies. Mr. Wilker is betting that the company's next best seller will be "In the First Degree," an interactive courtroom drama scheduled for release Sept. 25. This CD-ROM, which includes four hours of original video shot in San Francisco with local actors, allows a player to be the prosecutor in a love-triangle murder.

Also later this month, Living Books, which is jointly owned by Broderbund and Random House, a unit of Advance Publications, will introduce a new interactive line of Dr. Seuss's children's books.

Before "Myst," Broderbund had an unprecedented string of hits, mostly in "edutainment" programs for children, like "Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?" "Kidpix" and "Printshop." The company derives a fair share of revenue from upgrades of its old, popular titles.

The phenomenal but unexpected success of "Myst," however, has forced Broderbund to take stock of its marketing strategy.

Under Jan Gullett, a former Pepsico marketing vice president, who joined the company in March as marketing director, Broderbund is repackaging its products to create greater brand identity. It now distributes its software in nearly 20,000 retail outlets, including Toys "R" Us and Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

Whether "In the First Degree" meets expectations or not, Mr. Wilker will not be slowing down.

"I don't spend a lot of time looking far into the future," he said. "To me, the operational definition of eternity is 18 months, which is the length of a product cycle." At any moment, Mr. Wilker's 200-member creative team has as many as 30 projects in the pipeline. He would not disclose his development budget.

Operating like a software maker and a book publisher, Broderbund creates its own products while soliciting programs from outside developers. The company draws such a flood of ideas that one full-time staff member does nothing but sift through unsolicited submissions.

More important for Broderbund, the company also attracts established software developers. Peter Adair and Haney Armstrong -- filmmakers-turned-software developers, based in San Francisco -- designed "In the First Degree." Before signing with Broderbund, which is providing programming, technical and marketing expertise, they had turned down 10 offers, including one for more than $1 million from a movie studio Mr. Adair would not identify. "We prized our independence, and they were able to give us that," he said of Broderbund.

"Myst" was created by Robyn and Rand Miller, brothers working for Cyan Inc., a small software company in Spokane, Wash. (Broderbund has been Cyan's exclusive distributor since 1991.) Broderbund acts as the Millers' publisher and pays them a monthly royalty. The two brothers brought "Myst" to Broderbund, they said, because they respected Douglas G. Carlston, the company's founder and chief executive.

"The main constraint to creative growth in this industry is finding people who can do it well," Mr. Wilker said. "I can't replace people just by getting a bigger budget. We could be doing twice the number of titles if we could find the good ideas and the people to execute them.

"We give people room to roam," Mr. Wilker added. Almost anybody on his staff can get two months and a budget of up to $25,000 to pursue an interesting idea. Failure is acceptable and risk-taking encouraged.

Laurie K. Strand, a former journalist, heads one of three internal studios dedicated to product development. She oversees teams of art directors, animators, writers, computer graphics specialists, programmers and sound designers.

"It's a very collaborative process," Ms. Strand explained. "It's different from making a film, where you have one director who is the keeper of the vision. Interactive software is not linear. It requires an understanding by several key groups. You have to predict how a user will make decisions, navigate through the layers and levels of interactivity. So the programmers and software engineers are as important as the writers and designers."

For Broderbund, the scheduled release next year of Myst II could mean another milestone.

"Myst II could become one of the best-selling CD-ROM titles of all time," said Mr. Benjamin, the Robertson, Stephens analyst. "I wouldn't be surprised if they sold two million copies, which at $40 each is equal to a hit movie."

A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 11, 1995, Section D, Page 7 of the National edition with the headline: Broderbund Casts Itself as a Studio.

-- Pres N  03:15, 22 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! You're a legend. <3--Coin945 (talk) 14:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)


 * I wonder if you could source these for me too?--Coin945 (talk) 09:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-01-27-fi-22647-story.html
 * https://www.nytimes.com/1994/08/14/books/are-these-books-or-what-cd-rom-and-the-literary-industry.html

Copyright problem on Living Books
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://wanderfulstorybooks.com/news.html and https://web.archive.org/web/20170306011835/http://www.iier.waier.org.au/iier13/unsworth.html, which are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed and I paraphrased some. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC) Please look a bit closer at your revert. Your edit is actually reversing copyediting I have created and removing images I have sourced and added. It is confusing me while in the middle of an edit. Please let me post my edit as is, and then add your copyedits on top.--Coin945 (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you ! I'm aware of this and will get to it straight away. Unfortunately your edit muddled up an edit of my own so I reverted it for now. But I'm on top of the copyvio as I've submitted the article for DYK (which has a thorough copyvio review)--Coin945 (talk) 13:23, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I am going to have to restore the copyright compliant version. Please stay off the page while I repair the edit conflict. I'll let you know when I'm done.— Diannaa (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi ! It seems that your edit has inadvertedly created another edit conflict which I will have to now fix. Please I ask again, don't edit the article while I am working on it. While I appreciate the intention behind your edits, they removed some important context and I would prefer do rework the article on my own. Thank you for understand! :)--Coin945 (talk)
 * Can you please stop editing the article so I can fix it? Please stop restoring the copyvio! Thank you.— Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * My edit at 13:55 has fixed the second edit conflict. Please DO NOT RE-ADD the copyright material.— Diannaa (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help . Your edits have been very useful in removing copyvio! :) As I mentioned before, I'm in the middle of a DYK nomination. Once I've completed my final edits, would you be willing to do a full copyedit? We got off on the wrong foot, hopefully we can schedule our edit timing a bit better in the future haha!--Coin945 (talk) 14:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your kind words. Sorry but I don't have time anymore to do copy edit work! You might consider asking at the GOCE requests page instead.— Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Re:User:Coin945/The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey)
Hey! Yeah, I can't deny that the history of The Learning Company is fascinating, especially with how its downfall essentially marked the end of the booming educational game market. I've had to cover Mattel's game-industry antics in a few articles I've worked on in the past, simply because the fallout was so large and impacted so many other games and companies. It's a big subject. Personally, I just don't feel qualified to tackle something of that scale and scope. I favor more niche subjects that I can cover exhaustively (Runaway: A Road Adventure is a recent example of this) rather than vast, sweeping topics like you'd get with a page about a game genre, a console or a huge corporation. Parsing that much information is just overwhelming to me. Plus, I've mainly been editing Wikipedia lately to blow off steam and pass the time, so I've stuck to low-effort side projects (like filling out Template:Gary Grigsby) when I edit at all. That said, I do wish you luck with this huge project—hopefully there are others on WPVG who'd be more willing than I am to take something like this on! JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your reply. I can appreciate what you're saying. The good news is that I've done all the hard research and structuring of the article's scope. I've bashed out a very rough draft by placing the content and sources into an outline of the article. All if needs now is a copyedit and once over to finesse the article into cohesive sentences. I wonder if you'd be keen to give it a crack? I'm mentally exhausted after all that and would love your expertise.

Orphaned non-free image File:Living Books proximity to CD-ROM.png
Thanks for uploading File:Living Books proximity to CD-ROM.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Living Books speed test.png
Thanks for uploading File:Living Books speed test.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Chewy: Esc from F5
Hello. Unfortunately one or more of your recent contributions to Chewy: Esc from F5 have been reverted. Even though this edit was made in good-faith, the lead does not require citations unless contentious. Thank you for adding the image. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 12:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 17:02, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Living Books
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of DragonVale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DragonVale, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/DragonVale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Under the Oak Tree


The article Under the Oak Tree has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of television notability or general notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey)
Hi there. While working on The Learning Company (formerly SoftKey), I noticed that much of the content you added in November is in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Specifically, much of the article text was copied and pasted directly from sources. I had to remove the copyrighted text, but I paraphrased and kept as much as I could. I would advise you to be very careful not to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia going forward, lest this become a recurring issue. —  The Only Zac  (talk) 03:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You're a legend! Thank you for smoothing out the edges of this article. It took a huge amount of work to research and rough out the article structure, so I'm really glad you came along and finessed it. Copyvio issues noted for the future. :)--Coin945 (talk) 03:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah thanks, I'm happy to help! I can tell you put a lot of time and effort into the initial research, which has not gone unappreciated. Just gotta be careful not to publish anything that's copied from other websites. —  The Only Zac  (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loves Me, Loves Me Not


The article Loves Me, Loves Me Not has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE, Wikipedia is not an IMdB mirror."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 02:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Requests for MasterClass article
Hello! My name is Alyssa and I work for MasterClass. I've disclosed this on my profile and at Talk:MasterClass, where I've proposed some changes to correct and bring the article up to date. More specifically, I've asked to fix language about the company's founding and remove a sentence which is not specifically confirmed by sourcing. I saw you've edited the article before, from the beginning! Thanks for this. Do you have a moment to review my requests on the article's talk page? MC Alyssa (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

"Letterbox" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Letterbox. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Cover Orange for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cover Orange is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cover Orange until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Seventyfiveyears (talk) 18:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pixel Defenders Puzzle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pixel Defenders Puzzle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pixel Defenders Puzzle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pinktoebeans (talk) 13:49, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Under the Sea.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Under the Sea.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Mass Nomination of Articles for AfD
Hi @Coin945, before nominating more old unsourced articles please, please have a look at BEFORE - you are urged to look for sources for each and every of your articles you want to nominate for deletion.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd just come here to urge him to withdraw them. This is a huge misunderstanding of the purpose of AfD on many levels. 72 nominations is three-quarters of the total AfD gets on an average day, and over the course of three hours with absolutely no indication of the most basic research. It's essentially a WP:TRAINWRECK that happens to be unbundled. Vaticidalprophet</b> 10:10, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * There are an additional five articles where the nomination was malformed, with no discussion page created. I for one have no objection to well-researched nominations.  I want well-researched nominations, and subsequent discussion contributions, as they ensure that we get the right result.  But it is evident from these that zero research has been done.  Ironically, this means that there's going to be massive resistance by other people to this make-work, and a push to speedy keep everything.  This is very definitely not the way to be using AFD, nor to find and fix a stub.  Come on!  You clearly know how to research subjects, from all of that DYK/GA stuff.  Uncle G (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The malformed ones are, , , , and . Uncle G (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've reverted the AfD tags on these five articles, with no prejudice against a proper (re-)nomination provided that the good advice given here is heeded. --<b style="color: green;">Finngall</b> <sup style="color: #D4A017;">talk  16:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd also kindly ask that you please withdraw them. You do appear to have identified a couple that need to be deleted, but the bulk nominations without any clear evidence of WP:BEFORE makes it difficult to support your position. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:00, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Supporting a call for you to please withdraw them all. It takes work to prepare an AfD nomination and I’m afraid it’s clear you just haven’t done it. Mccapra (talk) 12:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, please withdraw them, and then go through them one by one at a slower pace. Some of your nominations are valid, but there are other options to flooding AfD – for example, I agree that Hopestrumentals probably doesn't pass WP:NALBUM and shouldn't have its own article. But you could have tried a proposed deletion first, or considered whether just to boldly redirect it to Hope (Non-Prophets album) as it's just an instrumental version of the same record... maybe this wouldn't have been the best solution as Hope doesn't mention Hopestrumentals anywhere, but I'm just saying that it was an option worth considering. Richard3120 (talk) 14:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to pile on, but it really is excessive to see one editor's name on AfD nom after nom. Worse, each nomination is just boilerplate about being unsourced and not notable, but no explanation is given.  Being unsourced is actually not sufficient for AfD (the standard is that no sources are expected to exist, or that a thorough search fails to find them), and lack of notability is a minimum and you must explain why you believe the subject is not notable Hyperion35 (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Browsing through the noms, oh so many noms, and I see City Attorney and Anal Sphincterotomy? I think this goes beyond just inappropriate lack of WP:BEFORE.  I believe that there is a serious CIR issue here.  I am trying to be polite and civil, I do not intend insult, but nominating articles like these for deletion is in some ways more disturbing than the rapid-pace mass deletion effort. Beyond slowing down and doing basic research, I have to question whether you should be nominating articles for deletion at all. Hyperion35 (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * You did the right thing. Those fighting to keep this rubbish of dictionary definitions and total drek are the ones who are showing utter contempt for Wikipedia and what it is meant to be. Keep up the good work.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi all, nice to meet you! Thank you taking the time to visit me and help me better understand the AFD process; I genuinely appreciate it. I didn't mean to cause any undue effort by yourself and others. I suppose my horror when trawling through our oldest unsourced articles from 2006/7, coupled with the thrill of seeing the new ability to AFD nom with only a few clicks, led to me going a bit overboard. I didn't feel right Prodding or redirecting without community involvement so chose to AFD the ones that I thought deserved further critique. I didn't do as much WP:Before as I should have, but my intentions were pure. I'm hesistant to withdraw my noms... It seems that many (most?) of these discussions are heading towards deletion/redirect/merge; though indeed a few of them have been rightly rescued by meticulous source sleuths. At the end of the day, I'm grateful that some of these abandoned articles are being addressed after 15 years and I look forward to us working together to make Wikipedia a better project tomorrow than it was today.--Coin945 (talk) 06:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I very much am glad you are here, and understand your process. I want to express apologiy for having engaged in rhetoric that I should not have in this discussion. I has caused me a whole lot of headache. I wish I could just turn back the clock. I would encourage you to in the future try to articlulate more clearly that the articles do not meet a specific policy. I need to do better at this too. The policy in question is Verifiability. This is the most ignored policy in place. There is another policy that in some ways contradicts this one, but this one is the one that is the most imperative.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, per WP:NEXIST, topic notability is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles themselves. Per the guideline, "The absence of sources or citations in an article (as distinct from the non-existence of sources) does not indicate that a subject is not notable." Furthermore, Verifiability is a content policy, whereas deletion policy is Wikipedia's deletion policy. The rationale directly above to base notability upon whether or not articles are sourced, and therefore verified, is a conflation that is not congruent with Wikipedia's deletion policy whatsoever. North America1000 21:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * To be fair, my deletion rationale isn't based solely on them being unsourced, but about them having been unsourced for 15 years, at which point such unverified material is likely to be assumed as 'fact' simply because it's been around so long. That's quite dangerous. If any of these articles went through the AFC progress today, they would all likley not get passed. It didn't make much sense to me why they should have a special status simply because they were created in 2006/7. So I felt it was appropriate to have a serious discussion about each of them. Which I think we have. :)--Coin945 (talk) 02:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have actually proposed forcing all articles to go through AfC, but there seems to be little support for such a move. AfC is paifully slow.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have an AfC proposal I submitted over 2 months ago. It has not been reviewed. It says that it may take 5 months or more.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System
Hello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Thankyou
Thankyou for trying to make Wikipedia a better place by nominating so many drek articles for deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for trying to make Wikipedia a better place. I much applaud you attempt to enforce Verifiability. This is a policy of Wikipedia that we clearly need to follow more.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Retro video games
If you're interested, these are mostly games from the 1980s but a few from the 1990s, which might have potential based on the number of reviews I found for them. I had previously posted this on the VG WP talk page:


 * Alcatraz II (Microdeal/Spectral Associates)
 * Alien Defense (Soft Sector Marketing)
 * Alien Rain (aka Apple Galaxian) – (Broderbund / Star-Craft)
 * Armored Patrol (Adventure International)
 * Beer Run (Sirius Software)
 * Bellhop (video game) (Hayden Software)
 * Berserk aka Color Berserk (Mark Data Products / Microworks)
 * Blockade Runner (video game) (Interphase)
 * Blockbuster (video game) (Mindscape)
 * Bounceoids (Cornsoft Group)
 * Buzzard Bait (Sirius Software)
 * Buzzword (video game) (Buzzword Game Company) [*]
 * Cave Hunter (Mark Data Products / Dragon Data) (p101)
 * Caverns of Callisto (Origin Systems)
 * Ceiling Zero (video game) (Turnkey Software)
 * Championship Golf: The Great Courses of the World - Volume One: Pebble Beach (Gamestar)
 * Checkers (video game) (Odesta Software) [*]
 * Chopper Rescue (Microprose)
 * Club Backgammon (California Dreams / Logical Design Works)
 * Color Space Invaders (Spectral Associates)
 * Computer War (Thorn EMI)
 * Congo (video game) (Sentient Software)
 * Cosmic Fighter (Big Five Software)
 * County Fair (video game) (Datamost)
 * Crime Wave (video game) (Pengiun Software)
 * Crossword Magic (L&S Computerware / Mindscape)
 * Deadly Skies (video game) (Tronix)
 * Defense Command (video game) (Big Five Software)
 * Deluxe Invaders (Roklan Corporation)
 * Dino Wars (Radio Shack / Tandy)
 * Donkey King (video game) (Microdeal / Tom Mix Software)
 * Eagles (video game) (Strategic Simulations)
 * Everest Explorer (Acorn Software Products)
 * Evolution (1982 video game) (Sydney Development Corp)
 * Falcons (video game) (Piccadilly Software)
 * Fantasyland 2041 A.D. (Crystal Computer)
 * Fast Eddie (video game) (Sirius Software)
 * Felony!, or Mystery Master: Felony! (CBS Software / Thunder Mountain / Mindscape)
 * Firebird (video game) (Gebelli Software)
 * Free Fall (video game) (Sirius Software)
 * Galax Attax (Spectral Associates)
 * Go (video game) (Hayden Software Company)
 * Gold Fever! (Tronix Publishing)
 * Gold Rush (1982 video game) (Sentient Software)
 * Gruds in Space (Sirius Software)
 * Hellcat Ace (MicroProse)
 * In the Chips (video game) (Creative Software)
 * International Gran Prix (Muse Software / Riverbank Software)
 * Joan of Arc: Siege & the Sword (Chip / Softgold / GO! / U.S. Gold / Broderbund)
 * Juggler (video game) (Innovative Design Software, Inc.)
 * Juice! (Tronix Publishing)
 * Jump Jet (video game) (Avant-Garde Creations)
 * Kamikaze (1982 video game) (Hayden Software Company)
 * K-Razy Antiks (CBS Software / K-Byte)
 * L.A. Crackdown (Epyx)
 * Lancaster (video game) (Silicon Valley Systems)
 * Leatherneck (video game) (Microdeal)
 * Marauder (video game) (Sierra On-Line)
 * Masquerade (video game) (Phoenix Software)
 * Microwave (video game) (Cavalier Computer)
 * Mindwheel (Synapse / Broderbund)
 * Minit Man (Penguin Software)
 * Monty Plays Scrabble (Ritam Corporation)  (there are more reviews from other publishers which are probably for this same game)
 * Moonbase Io (Program Design Inc) [*]
 * Mothership (video game) (Softsync)
 * Mouskattack (Sierra On-Line / On-Line Systems)
 * Mudpies (video game) (Michtron / Microdeal)
 * Murder by the Dozen, or Mystery Master: Murder by the Dozen (CBS Software)
 * Neptune (1982 video game) (Gebelli Software)
 * Odin (video game) (Odesta)
 * Oil-Rig (Computer Programs Unlimited)
 * Omni-Play Basketball (SportTime)
 * Outhouse (video game) (Soft Sector Marketing / Computer Shack)
 * Pandemonium (1982 video game) (Soft Images)
 * Panic Button (video game) (First Star Software)
 * Panzer Grenadier (video game) (Strategic Simulations)
 * Peeping Tom (video game) (Micro Lab)
 * Pentapus (Turning Point Software)
 * Pictionary: The Game of Quick Draw (Domark / Broderbund)
 * Pie-Man (Penguin Software)
 * Pig Pen (video game) (Datamost / TMQ Software)
 * Pinhead (video game) (Utopia Software) [*]
 * Plasmania (Sirius Software)
 * Powerstar (video game) (Pandora Software) [*]
 * Purple Turtles (Quicksilva)
 * Ricochet (1981 video game) (Automated Simulations / Epyx)
 * Run for the Money (video game) (Scarborough Systems)
 * Scorpion (1982 video game) (Tronix Publishing)
 * Shuttle Intercept (Hayden Software)
 * Slaygon (Microdeal)
 * Soccer (Thorn EMI)
 * Solar Star (video game) (Microdaft)
 * Space War (Spectral Associates) (Spectral Associates) [*]
 * Star Blaster (Piccadilly Software)
 * Star League Baseball (Gamestar)
 * Star Thief (video game) (Cavalier Computer)
 * Starfighter (1981 video game) (Adventure International)
 * Stunt Flyer (Sierra On-Line)
 * Succession (video game) (Piccadilly Software)
 * Super Boulder Dash (Electronic Arts)
 * Teleport (video game) (Cavalier Computer)
 * The Caverns of Freitag (Muse Software)
 * The Crimson Crown (Polarware / Penguin Software)
 * The Game Show (video game) (Computer Advanced Ideas)
 * The Games: Summer Edition (Epyx / U.S. Gold)
 * The Goonies (1985 video game) (Datasoft / IntelliCreations)
 * The Heist (video game) (Micro Fun / Micro Lab)
 * The Honeymooners (video game) (First Row Software)
 * The Spy Strikes Back! (Penguin Software)
 * The Standing Stones (Electronic Arts)
 * Touchdown Football (Imagic)
 * Tunnel Terror (Adventure International)
 * Turmoil (1982 video game) (Sirius Software / Fox Video Games)
 * Video Vegas (Baudville)
 * Windwalker (video game) (Origin Systems)
 * Zenith (video game) (Gebelli Software)

BOZ (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Casey's Contraptions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey's Contraptions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Casey's Contraptions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  22:05, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Where in Europe Title Card.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Where in Europe Title Card.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Carmen Sandiego icons.jpg

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Lists_of_popular_pages_by_WikiProject --Coin945 (talk) 17:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * You look with your human eyes down the list, then find the first stub? Very interesting outreach model, I like it a lot.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  17:47, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Haha yes, I indeed have human eyes. Thank you! My reasoning is that if tonnes of Wikipedia readers are landing on a particular Stub page and relying on our content, then it's important we turn it into a comprehensive article to uphold our reputation. :)--Coin945 (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Elevate (video game)
Hello, Coin945,

Thank you for creating Elevate (video game).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Additional sources for verification needed. Thank you."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:04, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

most-viewed stub
Hi. Thanks for the notice, but could you recheck which is the most-viewed stub for WikiProject Languages? The one you noted was mislabeled a stub (it was rated C class by other projects). Or maybe leave a link for where we can check for ourselves? I'd like to review the top half dozen or so, and expand those I know something about.

Thanks, — kwami (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * WikiProject Linguistics/Popular pages, WikiProject Languages/Popular pages.--Coin945 (talk) 02:23, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks! — kwami (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

canonical painting modes of the Renaissance
You'd better write that redlink sharpish or I will revert all these additions. Johnbod (talk) 17:12, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Any chance a pro like yourself could give it a whirl..?--Coin945 (talk) 01:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * No thanks. I suggest you add a sentence or two with a reference to Italian Renaissance painting, then set up a redirect. Johnbod (talk) 02:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Elements talk
Looks like here you removed my 10:15 post. Was that intentionally? Anyway, please reinstall. -DePiep (talk) 14:33, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This was a mistake, apologies. If you could readd to the talk page.--Coin945 (talk) 18:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. -DePiep (talk) 19:53, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Typequick at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Detective Grimoire (series)
Hello, Coin945,

Thank you for creating Detective Grimoire (series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Article needs more references / reviews / discussions, like this."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Typequick
Hello! Your submission of Typequick at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- RoySmith (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC) -- RoySmith (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance
Reference please!!! Johnbod (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canonical painting modes of the Renaissance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 19:12, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of What's done is done for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What's done is done is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/What's done is done& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 18:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

NSYNC article creation
Hi, I appreciate your creation of NSYNC-related articles. I am just concerned about whether it will be enough to meet WP:NSONG since there is no significant independent coverage of "Something Like You" and That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You", and has not received any mainstream chart or award recognition. I saw a Rolling Stone source primarily discussing "Digital Get Down" so maybe that could be a potential article for creation instead. Also the title for "That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You" contains two WP:CURLY quotations such as this (’) instead of straight quotations such as this ('). Curly quotations are primarily not used in Wikipedia, and has caused the article in this revision of No Strings Attached to appear with a WP:REDLINK. Maybe you could request a page move without the curly quotations such as like this (That’s When I’ll Stop Loving You to That's When I'll Stop Loving You), so it could be more easily accessible. Thank you. — Angryjoe1111 (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Joseph, King of Dreams linetest.ogv
Thanks for uploading File:Joseph, King of Dreams linetest.ogv. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:I Just Can't Wait to Be King.ogg


The file File:I Just Can't Wait to Be King.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Exceeds 10% of the song's length required by MOS:SAMPLE/WP:NFC. Can be trimmed down to comply with WP:NFCC. However, critical commentary insufficient to support the sample. May fail WP:NFCC."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chopper (video game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chopper (video game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chopper (video game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DocFreeman24 (talk) 02:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:A Guy Like You.ogg


The file File:A Guy Like You.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC, even when trimmed and downgraded to meet WP:NFCC and MOS:SAMPLE."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:The Bells of Notre Dame.ogg
 * File:Hellfire from Hunchback of Notre Dame.ogg
 * File:Wie aus stein.ogg
 * File:Out There (The Hunchback of Notre Dame).ogg

File:God Help The Outcasts - Der Glockner.ogg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:God Help The Outcasts - Der Glockner.ogg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Tarzan and Jane (musical)
Hi,

You used "google translate" as references, and now the links are thoroughly dead. Can you restore the references? I cannot because the html addresses seem to be nonenglish andd are unreadble to me. Loew Galitz (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cover of Kewala's Typing Adventure - Japan version.jpg


The file File:Cover of Kewala's Typing Adventure - Japan version.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-free cover art of Japanese version possibly unnecessary. English-language cover art already used. May fail WP:NFCC and/or WP:NFCC."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:Typequick IBM.jpg
 * File:Noel McIntosh founder of Typequick.png

Proposed deletion of File:Be Prepared reprise.ogg


The file File:Be Prepared reprise.ogg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Taken from video saying 'Prop. of Walt Disney Co. Do not duplicate.' May fail WP:NFCC and/or WP:NFCC. Also, possibly insufficiently supported by critical commentary, which may be already understood without the sample. May also fail WP:NFCC."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also: This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * File:For the First Time in Forever.ogg
 * File:Elaine (ABBA).ogg
 * File:One Man, One Woman.ogg
 * File:Written In Stone (Reprise).ogg
 * File:Just Around the Riverbend.ogg
 * File:In Summer (Frozen).ogg
 * File:Go the Distance.ogg

File:God Help the Outcasts scene.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:God Help the Outcasts scene.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Deliver Us (The Prince of Egypt song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Binksternet (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System


Hello, Coin945. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Orbits: Voyage Through the Solar System".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 18:29, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carmen Sandiego Space.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JumpStart Toddlers
Hello, Coin945,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, JumpStart Toddlers, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, please see my comment on the article's talk page. Please note that I am also an established Wikipedia editor with around 15 years' experience, and the article has numerous reliable third-party sources. :)--Coin945 (talk) 13:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Master of Dimensions moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Master of Dimensions, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  21:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I believe you are mistaken due to the numerous quality sources in the arricle. Please can you reverse your draftspace edit? I am also happy for you to take this article (and the other) to AFD for community discussion.--Coin945 (talk) 02:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * uninvolved editor, but wholly endorse 's decision. There are at least four huge citation errors present. Edit it in draft space to fix those and the other issues raised, and then a possible mainspace move can be considered. Star   Mississippi  18:27, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm also concerned that you're getting awfully sloppy with your article creations again...Please, let's not let this be a whole big thing again... Sergecross73   msg me  18:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your comments everyone. This is a very well-written and researched article, and I am proud of what I have achieved. I will fix up those 4 citations, maybe make a few other changes, and then it should be good to go! Take care and have a wonderful day. --Coin945 (talk) 00:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Super Spy (video game) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Super Spy (video game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  21:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Master of Dimensions has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Master of Dimensions, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Master_of_Dimensions help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

DYK for JumpStart Toddlers
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Friend Like Me.jpg


The file File:Friend Like Me.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Genie's neon 'Applause' screenshot not contextually significant to the song 'Friend Like Me'. Also, caption describing the screenshot is possibly original research, which is against one of core content policies."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Reason for Removed Redirect?
Hello.Tonka Search & Rescue was redirected to Hasbro Interactive due to a failure of WP:PRODUCT. I noticed that you have removed this redirect and i cannot find prior discussion for this decision.. Can you please clarify why this redirect was made? PerryPerryD Talk To Me 19:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I object to this too, for the record. It's so vague and short that you can't even glean any information from it. It's not even defined or described any further other than being a board game, and a couple obscure reviewers giving extremely vague commentary on whether it's worth buying. I don't understand how you can think it's of any value in its current state. I'm fine if you want to send it to the draft space to develop it further, but it's absolutely not ready to be published until the mainspace. Sergecross73   msg me  14:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Coin945Read the edit summary on the latest edit for this page please. PerryPerryD  Talk To Me 15:19, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Earth Day 2022 Edit-a-thon - April 22nd - 2PM EST
-- Environment of New York City Task Force

Jonathan Larson
Hi--about this edit, please see MOS:NOSECTIONLINKS. Thx. Drmies (talk) 14:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Coin945

Thank you for creating J.P. Morgan Saves the Nation.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color: #0000cc;">North8000</b> (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Super Spy (video game)
Hello, Coin945. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Super Spy (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Super Spy (video game) (July 4)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Super Spy (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Super Spy (video game), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Super_Spy_(video_game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zxcvbnm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Super_Spy_(video_game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)

Long talk page
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines: "Large talk pages are difficult to read and load slowly over slow connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." – this talk page is KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)