User talk:Col. Sweeto

July 2010
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ATucker_Max&action=historysubmit&diff=371735125&oldid=371534517. Thank you. ''this is your second warning. do not accuse good faith contributors of vandalism because you disagree with their edits. review wikipedia's actual definition of vandalism, and review wp:agf'' Theserialcomma (talk) 04:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I do assume good faith, unfortunately your edits on the subject in the past have consistently demonstrated bad faith. Col. Sweeto (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Tucker Max
I was about to revert this stuff myself  per WP:DENY but saw you'd beat me to it  by about a week. I filed a SPI for this individual at Sockpuppet investigations/Theserialcomma. --Tothwolf (talk) 13:58, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Tuckermaxassholesfinishfirst.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tuckermaxassholesfinishfirst.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:10, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hilarity Ensues


The article Hilarity Ensues has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. Only primary sources and references from 2010 for a 2012 book.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gobōnobo + c 08:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Sloppy Seconds: The Tucker Max Leftovers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sloppy Seconds: The Tucker Max Leftovers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sloppy Seconds: The Tucker Max Leftovers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gobōnobō + c 04:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)