User talk:Colaboratorwiki

Welcome!
Hello, Colaboratorwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorials
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! VViking Talk Edits 15:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, Colaboratorwiki. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add request edit to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear MrOllie,
 * You can review what you consider appropriate and I appreciate your email. I did not know that the Talk page existed but I am going to review what you tell me.
 * All the information that I add increases the content of the page where I intervene, either by adding some clarification or including quotes, in some cases required. Whenever it is pertinent and because I know perfectly the content of the articles that I add. In addition to this, I also correct misspellings, misprints, lack of precision in the language, and add information, especially in the equivalent terms in Spanish. If you find something that is not true or does not make sense where it has been added you can delete it, of course. But I also tell you that I know very well what I add and where, because I read and understand everything on the modified subject and I know how to include it in its rhetorical line.
 * I am beginning to contribute and I am going little by little. What I will do is expand content and add various quotes then, even if it requires much more time for me.
 * Thank you very much for the advice.
 * Best regards Colaboratorwiki (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)