User talk:Cold Light

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Alexa rating
A low Alexa rating is good indication that barely anyone visits a website.

lots of issues | leave me a message 23:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * No that's an indication that many user don't use alexa-spyware. --217.84.44.94 15:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Anarchopedia
Hi,

First, a minor technical point: Yours was the only signed keep comment -- because the other keep commenter failed to sign his remark, I am free to discount it. That is not, however, why I found a deletion consensus -- remember AfD is not a "vote" in the strict sense, anyway; closers are empowered to weigh arguments. In this case, those favoring retention were quite poor, sadly. Your own remark referenced only pages within Anarchopedia and Wikipedia as sources: such self-references are deprecated by WP:RS. A verifiable article simply must have independent sources. The arguments of your unsigned fellow keep commenter were even further off the mark. Anarchopedia cannot be given a "pass" on the five pillars of Wikipedia because it is novel, noble, or a kindred wiki. Such an argument is exactly the opposite of policy here at Wikipedia, and only served to weaken the case for retaining the article. Put as simply as I can, there were no relevant arguments given in support of keeping the article. I'm sorry, but the decision was "open-and-shut" from a policy point-of-view, given the nature of the discussion in the record.

The place to present a request for appeal of the AfD is Deletion Review. You are free to go there and state a case, but I feel my closure was on very solid ground. I'm sure it goes without saying that I have nothing personal at stake here (I just "call them as I see them", as the saying goes) and I wish you good luck. Best wishes, Xoloz 03:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Please explain
< http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchopedia >;

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page >;

versus wiki.

Thank You.

Hopiakuta 03:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Dear User:Cold_Light:
Please assist me w/ the comparison.

I do not want to presume the differences.

Hopiakuta 04:37, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I, sincerely, want to know.

I had nothing to do w/ your deletion.

I feel that they delete far too much without negotiation.

Please??

Hopiakuta 15:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank You.

I've put more onto my page.

Hopiakuta 23:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:hopiakuta >.
< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/Main_Page >;

< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:hopiakuta >.

Hopiakuta 17:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

??
< http://eng.anarchopedia.org/index.php/User:Cold_Light >??

Hopiakuta 03:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Space Race
I apologize for the tone of my comments. However, now that I reread your addition, it was also somewhat POV ("exploitation", "so-called"), and such. It just didn't really belong in that article. --Golbez 01:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Criticism of Windows Vista
Hello, I recently reverted your edit to Criticism of Windows Vista, as it appears that you added a new section header without any content. Since you have edited other pages since then, I assume you are not going to add content, so this section was removed. If you do have content to add, please add it along with the header. Thanks Tiggerjay 01:55, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Criticism of fractional reserve...

 * Thanks for your comments. I will take a crack at cleaning it up. I'll take your comments into consideration and please give feedback. One issue was that it said "also," frequently, and the spelling was quite bad. I will admit to perhaps acting quickly on reverts on that page, which come primarily from a noted sockpuppet, and my apologies if your comments did not get due consideration due to my itchy trigger finger (as a result of the atrocious history there). Best,--Gregalton (talk) 17:43, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I should note that from the beginning, I thought this article shouldn't exist and should be deleted. Since it remained, the main issue was reducing the amount of soapboxing and providing some balance. So further work is necessary, although it may be better to just start over.--Gregalton (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look at the new version. BTW: analysis (not analisis), I think you got hypothesis.--Gregalton (talk) 19:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:GameNavigation
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Go ahead. found a good template and stoped trying to build my own Cold Light (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Life expectancy in russia.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Life expectancy in russia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Planescape: Torment GA review
Hey there! In case you haven't seen, Planescape: Torment has been nominated as a Good Article, and the review has been placed on hold; some issues need to be resolved, so have a look at the review page and discuss the issues and let's get to work! BOZ (talk) 20:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Life expectancy in russia.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Life expectancy in russia.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2009 (UTC)