User talk:Coldross

January 2014
Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Robert Browning because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius (talk) 15:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Browning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robert Browning was changed by Coldross (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951499 on 2014-01-13T15:38:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 15:42, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Robert Browning, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 15:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Good intentions?
You blanked the Robert Browning page with the edit summary:
 * Replaced content with: No Longer in use as people are trying to copy it for there GCSE coursework and will be republished on 12th February 2014.

Presumably you are concerned that students are copying this page to complete their coursework. While I agree with you that this is not the intention of Wikipedia, and would likely be considered cheating by the students' teachers or test graders, it is not an acceptable solution to blank the page. You were given multiple warnings about this that you chose to ignore. You will likely be blocked for your actions, if only temporarily. Please read the warnings you have been given and learn why your actions violate Wikipedia policy. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Yeah, and of course that explains why you made edits such as this one. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:30, 14 January 2014 (UTC)