User talk:Coldupnorth/Archive8

GAC on Winston Churchill
I had taken it upon myself to review Winston Churchill after I saw your plea on the GA talk page for a thorough review. I assure you that I will provide a thoughtful and careful review. I already have extensive notes. You are welcome to ask around about my reviews to see if you think they are thorough enough (Scartol, WillowW, and Qp10qp would be a start). If you still want OhanaUnited to do the review, that is fine, but if s/he hasn't started, please do consider my wiki-qualifications. Thanks. Awadewit | talk  18:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I have already started, and I am saving my review comments in my word document (which is now over a page long). Btw, I blanked User talk:LordHarris/GA reviews because I think the previous user is using it for pure advertisement. I took a look at your GA reviews and I am impressed by how detailed your reviews are. I would like to invite you to participate at GA Sweeps. We decided it's time to give GA a good sweep to ensure the qualities of all GA articles. You recevied this invitation because we felt that you can improve and uphold the quality of Good articles. This is the reason why only experienced reviewers who are established (trusted) within the project should participate in this sweep initially. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think there's a miscommunication happening. When you say you nominated the article at GAN and wishes me to comment on that, I believe that you were asking me to do a GAN review on that article. If you were looking purely for inputs/comments, it should really be peer review and not GAN. Anyways, my GAN summary should be finished within a day or two. OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems as if OU is taking this one. LH, when you take the article to peer review, let me know and I'll finish up my review and copy edits then. Awadewit | talk  11:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm having some network problem. The connection is, during this weekend (and still is), unstable. It stalls and then disconnects if I idle for an extended amount of time. Since my review is quite long, I have to separate them into sections and post them up separately. I'm also having exam on Tuesday. Sorry to keep you waited. OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Triple crown
Your Majesty, I hadn't been aware that the United States Navy honored Winston Churchill by naming a destroyer after him - and I'm a United States Navy veteran! Great work. Cheers, Durova Charge! 04:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter for December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter has been published. Comments are welcome on this, as well as suggestions or offers of assistance for the January 2008 issue. Dr. Cash 01:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

GAC Reagan Library
Hi again. Thanks for reviewing the article, and I believe I have addressed all of your concerns. --Happyme22 (talk) 01:57, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! Happyme22 (talk) 05:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Just an aside on the Joe Klein article edits.....
When I saw that biased/unbalanced tag, I became furious. I left my boarding house for six hours and when I came back I was still seeing red. I know that all editors are to assume the good faith of everyone else, but right now that is very, very difficult for me. That is one of the reasons why I have sought opinions from the help desk -- what are required right now are people who do not share my current predisposition to flame him. Do you know of any people who are willing to weigh in on the subject? --Nbahn (talk) 08:22, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for putting up the "Current Event" tag. --Nbahn (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Good day to you. Have you been following all of the recent editing that has been going on in the article? I do not know if you are predisposed to weigh in on the topic, but I -- for one -- would greatly appreciate your thoughts on the matter. My opinion is that watering down the language would suit Joe Klein just perfectly well -- even if it does understate the case as to what is going on.--Nbahn (talk) 01:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

GAN review on Winston Churchill completed!
After quite a bit of time and hardwork, I finished the review on Winston Churchill. Please see my extensive GAN review for improvements. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 05:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I would again appreciate your comments on the Indian Independence section where Crizher again suggests my edits are biased. You may recall when I raised this with you before you suggested a sandbox which I set up and to which he declined to contribute. Backnumber1662 (talk) 20:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I am honoured to receive the Barnstar. In the words of Florence Nightingale "Too kind, too kind" Backnumber1662 (talk) 10:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Damn typo. I want to shoot myself -.- Thanks for the award. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 17:05, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

GAN review on Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom
Many thanks for your excellent review. I have addressed the comments you've made, and hope that you can now promote it. PeterSymonds | talk  19:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your efforts with this article, and also for the kind barnstar. I will work on those helpful points you mention and nominate it at FAC when I've finished. Again, thankyou. PeterSymonds | talk  16:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Margaret Thatcher
Hey recently I've been chiming into the Margaret Thatcher article as well, and I am available to help if you need anything. Great job with Churchill, too. Best, Happyme22 (talk) 21:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure thing, and same to you. Happyme22 (talk) 21:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles January Newsletter
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Meetup
Hi there, I noticed you expressed interest in the Birmingham meetup last October. Just letting you know, another UK meetup is in planning stages, here. We need input on where and when we will meet so comments would be much appreciated. Thanks.  Majorly  (talk) 16:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

my intentions regarding the Klein/Time article
What I want to do is to set it up as an independent article with cross-links to all of the other relevant articles. --NBahn (talk) 02:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I believe that the controversy is noteworthy because somewhere between 4 and 20 million people will have Klein's falsehoods/inaccuracies.
 * I believe that it complies with NPOV because the article clearly states (or provides citations that documents) that this is someone else's opinion.
 * I do not see how this can constitute original research when I've cited just about everything except the punctuation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbahn (talk • contribs) 23:53, 5 January 2008 (UTC) <br. />

Reagan's role in the Cold War
I don't know if you are interested, but I could use any of your comments here. Thanks, Happyme22 (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for your comments. I agree completely, and the sandbox notion is a very good one. Thank you for taking the time to share your views and the historical views of others. I'll get to work finding soruces. --Happyme22 (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the compliment. You seem to have your shoes tied correctly as well, from the look of your user and user Talk pages. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  21:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Things that Make Me Laugh
...has been expanded. If your day needs a bit of a smile, check it out. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  09:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

WC review
I'm glad you found the Winston review helpful. I really want to emphasize how good the article is (that is why the long list of nitpicks) and how impressed I am that you and the others have taken on this monumental figure (I shudder every time I think about finishing the Jane Austen article). However, I really urge you and the other editors to cut the article down. I did a substantial portion of the work on Joseph Priestley, who was a polymath and published 150 books. Fitting a discussion of his religious, political, educational, and scientific activities into one article was a nightmare. I was finally forced to create two subarticles (I should probably create one more). The Isaac Newton editors did the same thing. We, the editors, are always more enthusiastic about our subjects than our readers, I'm afraid. If you want to get a sense of how long WC appears to a reader, try reading Joseph Priestley. It is only about 8,000 or 9,000 words long (main text). I guarantee you that it will start to seem long (unless theology and eighteenth-century science are your cup of tea!). WC is twice as long. It's a good way to gain some perspective. Originally, JP was 11,000 words or something and I couldn't see my way to cutting anything. Then I read some long articles on topics I wasn't wedded to and I saw the proverbial light. :) Awadewit | talk  04:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm glad this was a helpful suggestion. Thank you so much for the images! They are wonderful! What a wonderful wiki-world we live in, eh? Awadewit | talk  21:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Winston Churchill in politics: 1900-1939 I would appreciate your comments on the first two sections as they are now. Are they too long, are they unclear? Should I add something on how contemporaries saw Churchill at that stage (his early Liberal phase?)- there's heaps of material from the Webbs, Lady Asquith &c &c) I will get to the next sections (Admiralty, Dardanelles) shortly Backnumber1662 (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Sources for Image:NewDeal.jpg montage
Can you add links to the images you used as sources for the Image:NewDeal.jpg montage. Thanks. Edward (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Your copyedit request
On 2 October 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on John Steinbeck. Because of a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we apologize. Since your request, this article may have been subject to significant editing and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. Finetooth (talk) 22:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)