User talk:Cole Jester

Welcome
Hello, Cole Jester, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 05:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. adding 'great' was confusing and unhelpful Dougweller (talk) 05:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. in the lead, you changed The Roman Emperor was the ruler of the Roman State" to "was the emperor" which obviously didn't explain the word emperor Dougweller (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Other edits
I had problems with virtually all of your edits. At AK-47 you added what I assume was your personal opinion to a sentence with a reference, making it appear that the reference said what you added. With some, it wasn't at all clear what you did, because you gave no explanations. Dougweller (talk) 05:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Dougweller (talk) 05:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)