User talk:ColeenRT

Welcome!
  Hello, ColeenRT!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tirishan (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Liberia have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Donald Albury 17:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  MrOllie (talk) 17:10, 7 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, thank you for your message. I'm a bit confused – could you please clarify, the article requires additional sources, I managed to locate a source complete with proper citation, but I noticed that it has been removed. Could you kindly explain the reason for this deletion? Thank you ColeenRT (talk) 18:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You've been adding obvious spam links - the same spam links you've been warned about on the half-dozen other accounts you've registered. You should consider this the final warning - If I see those sites added again (by any account), I will refer them for spam blacklisting. MrOllie (talk) 18:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I created multiple accounts for a specific reason: the vague rules governing content. What qualifies as non-spam content on one resource might be deemed spam on another. The determinants often seem subjective, largely dependent on the decisions of Wikipedia volunteers.
 * It's perplexing that certain pages linger for years with improvement notifications, yet individuals with available time opt not to enhance them, but instead remove new citations wholesale.
 * In essence, Wikipedia doesn't seem to undergo significant improvement, but rather a consolidation of authority that determines what constitutes spam or not. I urge for clearer spam criteria to be established – specifications regarding domain rating and spam score.
 * For instance, the link I included boasts a domain rating of 53 and a mere 1% spam score. Is a higher domain rating of 60 and a spam score of 0% preferable?
 * I seek clarity on how to distinguish between acceptable citations from one source and those not deemed suitable from another. ColeenRT (talk) 08:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You should start by reading WP:Reliable sources. PhilKnight (talk) 15:40, 14 August 2023 (UTC)