User talk:Colejohanson12

December 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Matt Walsh (political commentator) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 22:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)


 * what??? they removed my edit without explanation and all i did was revert it back! Colejohanson12 (talk) 22:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

appeal

 * This edit is vandalism.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * how so? Colejohanson12 (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * At the time of making the UCF edit, I hadn't read the rules carefully and realized after that I was wrong to make that edit. What I don't understand is the Matt Walsh edit. I removed POV language and the accusation of Matt being far-right. Colejohanson12 (talk) 13:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You did not remove any POV or accusatory language. The statement of them being far-right was reliably sourced. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:12, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The "source" was an opinion article from usa today in which the only mentioning of Matt Walsh was "and far-right commentators such as Matthew Walsh, a columnist and podcaster who has urged an “aggressive” approach to battle drag shows, which he likened to fighting cancer. USA Today did not cite ANY sources for this claim. Colejohanson12 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not gonna waste time arguing with someone who denies reliable sources. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:12, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * And i'm not gonna waste time arguing with someone who thinks usa today opinion articles are reliable sources. 😁 Colejohanson12 (talk) 17:45, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)