User talk:Colemancaden/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Taliazapata/sandbox Taliazapata (talk) 16:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)taliazapata

Peer Review
I think the first sentence should be reworded differently. Also i'm confused as to why your brought up the buy button, and then you went to views of videos of pres. election. I thik you should provide transitions or separate them into different paragraphs. Or you could just elaborate more on the first sentence & buy button. Other than that, your draft looks good and your sources as well! Taliazapata (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

Im with Talis here on the topic with the buy button. It might just be because I don't know where it fits in with the article. Other than that I think your draft is really well written and holds great facts. Ashton01 (talk) 02:21, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

i think the second sentence should be reworded because it seems biased. great draft with great facts.Taylorjharper (talk) 05:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft Feedback
Your draft material is well-written and interesting. If you refer to other WP articles, you'll want to link those pages from the one you add to. Also consider adding more detail. JAirhart 20:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Airhartcomp (talk • contribs) peer review- caleb "The "buy button", which can be traced back to system" is an incomplete statement. Good use of example and citations. Could use a little more clarification and less "fluffy" language Calebdb01 (talk) 15:31, 13 March 2019 (UTC)