User talk:Colettehelen1973

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chris Broad—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Does not appear constructive? What is this page for? Thought it was to tell the truth??? It’s 100% true and he pays maintenance .... want a screenshot of last weeks payment? He rejected her! Got DNA letter proof, took him to court and he has been paying for 20 YEARS!!! She contacted him last year and his email response was disgusting. I’m her mum. Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Broad. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Edi7* (Message Me! • 📜) 00:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Broad, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chris Broad was changed by Colettehelen1973 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9805 on 2020-01-13T00:46:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Well Facebook, Instagram etc are there I suppose!!! 👍🏻 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

What’s the point in edited versions of the truth lol 😂 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Truth is important and she is in the next room. Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism lol. Since when has telling the truth been classed as vandalism ???? Get a grip you complete idiot. He pays me maintenance - has Done for 20 years. He owed Me thousands in arrears and when I heard that Miche committed suicide I rang the CSA and told them to forget the arrears!!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism lol. Since when has telling the truth been classed as vandalism ???? Get a grip you complete idiot. He pays me maintenance - has Done for 20 years. He owed Me thousands in arrears and when I heard that Miche committed suicide I rang the CSA and told them to forget the arrears!!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Cluebot/Gorilla warfare!!! Can’t make this up!i It’s GUERILLA warfare 🤣 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

You gonna be telling me Trump the Cheeto is Jesus reincarnated next ha ha .... jog on ..... the truth outs .... always 👍🏻☺️ Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Chris Broad—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Does not appear constructive? What is this page for? Thought it was to tell the truth??? It’s 100% true and he pays maintenance .... want a screenshot of last weeks payment? He rejected her! Got DNA letter proof, took him to court and he has been paying for 20 YEARS!!! She contacted him last year and his email response was disgusting. I’m her mum. Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Broad. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Edi 7* (Message Me! • &#128220; ) 00:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Broad, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chris Broad was changed by Colettehelen1973 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.9805 on 2020-01-13T00:46:09+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Ok. Well Facebook, Instagram etc are there I suppose!!! 👍🏻 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

What’s the point in edited versions of the truth lol 😂 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Truth is important and she is in the next room. Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism lol. Since when has telling the truth been classed as vandalism ???? Get a grip you complete idiot. He pays me maintenance - has Done for 20 years. He owed Me thousands in arrears and when I heard that Miche committed suicide I rang the CSA and told them to forget the arrears!!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Vandalism lol. Since when has telling the truth been classed as vandalism ???? Get a grip you complete idiot. He pays me maintenance - has Done for 20 years. He owed Me thousands in arrears and when I heard that Miche committed suicide I rang the CSA and told them to forget the arrears!!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 00:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Cluebot/Gorilla warfare!!! Can’t make this up!i It’s GUERILLA warfare 🤣 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

You gonna be telling me Trump the Cheeto is Jesus reincarnated next ha ha .... jog on ..... the truth outs .... always 👍🏻☺️ Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Stuart Broad. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —  Newslinger  talk   01:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Colettehelen1973, to comply with Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons, you'll need to find a reliable source that covers these incidents before you can include them in a Wikipedia article. Social media sites do not count as reliable sources in this case. —  Newslinger  talk   01:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Court documents? Reliable source Copy of DNA test results? Reliable source m! Screen shot of weekly payments? Reliable source!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Anything else required 😂 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:28, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * On Wikipedia, "reliable sources" refer to publications with a strong reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Respected newspapers/magazines and books from reputable publishing houses would both work. Primary sources like court documents are not allowed to be used for claims about living people, but we can use reliable secondary sources that cover the court cases. Basically, if you want these incidents covered on Wikipedia, you'll need to go to the press. —  Newslinger  talk   01:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Great idea!!!!! Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

On Wikipedia, "reliable sources" refer to publications with a strong reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Respected newspapers/magazines and books from reputable publishing houses would both work. Primary sources like court documents are not allowed to be used for claims about living people, but we can use reliable secondary sources that cover the court cases. Basically, if you want these incidents covered on Wikipedia, you'll need to go to the press.

Magazines are seen as more reliable than uk court documents and government ordered dna testing. This is getting more hilarious by the minute. 😂. Do you actually believe what you read in the press? My god!! Got to Get this all out there in your supposed ‘respected reliable source’ ha ha!! Idiots!!!!! 😂 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

All saved and ready to forward to supposed ‘reliable sources’ ha ha!!!!! Night night Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Doh 🙄 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That's just how Wikipedia works. We're not allowed to do original research, but we can interpret research done for us by reliable sources. For example, you wouldn't like it very much if someone made an article on you, and then cited evidence that was altered or presented in a misleading way. We have no way of authenticating screenshots or scans of DNA tests. That's why we are required to use reliable sources: we're not able to trust any individual editor for information, but we can trust publications that have an established reputation. This provides protection against defamation for you, for Stuart/Chris Broad, and for everyone else. —  Newslinger  talk   01:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

My daughter is the image of Stuart. I have screen shots of the money I receive weekly from Chris, I have results letter from a government approved testing lab to establish that he should pay maintenance. She contacted Chris last year via email and got a response FROM HIS EMAIL ACCOUNT!!! just saying!! Anyway, I’m bored I’d this. No..... I wouldn’t like it if someone slandered me in public But equally I do not like the fact that my daughter has spent the best part of the last 10 years desperately wanting to know ‘who she is’ and interestingly she has problems with her hips and I recall him telling me that he had to have an operation on his hips! It’s not just about about emotions you know, it’s genetics too Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

By the way..... apologies if I’m being rude. I just hate watching my daughter suffer physically (hips) and emotionally because her biological father doesn’t want anything to do with her.

I will leave this issue now for another time. Again, apologies...... I just love my daughter Colettehelen1973 (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry x Colettehelen1973 (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm sorry for what you and your daughter had to go through, and I would also be incensed if I had to experience the same things. Both the Wikimedia Foundation and individual Wikipedia editors have previously been sued for defamation (by people/organizations described in Wikipedia articles), and part of why we require reliable sources is to avoid legal problems in the future. If another publication can cover this incident, anyone who thinks the claims are defamatory will need to confront the publication, instead of you or other Wikipedia editors. I hope this makes things a bit clearer from Wikipedia's perspective, and I wish you and your daughter the best. —  Newslinger  talk   02:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Truth?!?!?
Freedom of speech when proof is available 👍🏻 Colettehelen1973 (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2020 (UTC)