User talk:Colinclout1972

Welcome!
==Speedy deletion of Image:Desi D'Angelo.JPG== A tag has been placed on Image:Desi D'Angelo.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nsevs •  Talk  17:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Desi D'Angelo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Desi D'Angelo.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nsevs •  Talk  17:08, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Desi_D'Angelo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Desi_D'Angelo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 03:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Peter Hitchens
Currently your additions to the article run the risk of being removed as stating your point of view, as opposed to being neutral or the grounds of counting as 'original research'. The claim, of Hitchens taking a Jeremiah-like stand on his obsessions, is not difficult to sustain though, even without biblical authority, and one of Hitchens many prominent critics will surely have said something on these lines. Try the web, and quote them if you find anything. Just a cautionary note, the 'Clockback' who claims to be Peter Hitchens, is not an impostor. Philip Cross (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)