User talk:Colinpmacarthur

A page you started (PhoneDog v. Kravitz) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating PhoneDog v. Kravitz, Colinpmacarthur!

Wikipedia editor Sulfurboy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"great thanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Sulfurboy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

DYK nomination of Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company
Hello! Your submission of Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  06:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Friday Meeting
Hi Colin, No problem. I will post the draft to my user page. Please feel free to take a look and/or make comments. My email address is my wiki username at gmail. Sashashekhar (talk)

Comments
Hi Colin,

You have done a great job of simplifying and distilling down the facts, I like the additions you made to the legislative history for Patent Misuse. I just have a few comments: 1) the sub-headings are very long 2) the tenses (past/present) change in the article and 3) the content doesn't read smoothly between subheadings (this may not be critical).

Sashashekhar (talk)

Also... why did you merge history and case law? It looks a bit jumbled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sashashekhar (talk • contribs) 01:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmm. I combined the two because it seemed like much of the "history" also established the case law. Was there some case law that seems purely historical? 169.229.123.69 (talk) 02:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Craigslist v. 3Taps
Colin, the template substitution hasn't occurred yet, and that's because you haven't gotten the hook field right—the link to the article is named incorrectly (the "s" after "Craig" isn't there), it's missing a one of the two final brackets, and it isn't bolded.

[[Craiglist v. 3Taps]

needs to be written

Craigslist v. 3Taps

to come out Craigslist v. 3Taps

Once you've made that fix, the template substitution should work (use the editor's "Show preview" function; it should look like a standard DYK entry rather than still have "subst:NewDYKnomination" still visible in the preview. This should work; I've tried it in the editor. I can't be the one who saves it thought—that has to be you. The person who saves the changes is the one who is automatically entered on the template as the nominator, which is why you need to be the one to do it. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Craigslist v. 3Taps
Hello! Your submission of Craigslist v. 3Taps at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -- クラ  ウド  ６６８  04:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Craigslist v. 3Taps
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ACLU v. Clapper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fourth Amendment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)