User talk:CollectorCarSeller

August 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kruse International appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 20:21, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kruse International, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wuh Wuz  Dat  01:56, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Kuyabribri. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. I invite you to click the Wikipedia logo, at the top left corner of this page, and read "Welcome to Wikipedia,the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit",and that includes Kuyabribri as well. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  01:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Kruse International, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do NOT do that again. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  02:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Kruse International, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wuh Wuz  Dat  02:27, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kruse International. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wuh Wuz  Dat  02:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Why do you keep deleting my changes? I've quoted from legitimate news sources, citing facts as they have unfolded in this matter. Do you not understand basic fact finding, fact reporting and basic journalism? The public deserves to know the truth about this company. Your changes suggest they are still in the automotive editing business, but they have been permanently banned by the state of Indiana. CollectorCarSeller (talk) 02:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * See WP:NPOV, as your "changes" were not written in an encyclopedic manner. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  02:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

How do YOU suggest I report that a company, incorrectly listed on Wikipedia as being in this business, has been removed from this business by the license-issuing authority (the state of Indiana) and has had their property bought out by another company? I don't get you people; you seemed to be more interested in everyone being 'nice' than correct. CollectorCarSeller (talk) 02:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Nice is important, but WP:NPOV is even more so. I would suggest you start by reading (until you understand) ALL the "nice" information contained in the links I have supplied below, before you make any further edits on the subject. Wuh  Wuz  Dat  02:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)