User talk:Colleenowcf

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Confession0791 (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Confession0791 (talk) 18:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for abusing multiple accounts
I have temporarily blocked this account and permanently blocked User:Joevarock as it is fairly obvious that you are either the same user or are working in concert to push the same material on to Wikipedia. Please review our policy on abusing multiple accounts. If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of One World Children's Fund for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article One World Children's Fund, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One World Children's Fund until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Since you are currently blocked, you can add any remarks you would like to make to the deletion discussion, including links to any relevant sources that could be used in the article, on this page and they will be copied over to the debate. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Colleenowcf for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Confession0791 (talk) 05:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)