User talk:Collegeandbillman

Concerning the wiki page of my City Council Representative, Marti Emerald in San Diego. I've provided reliable sources and have not spoken harshly against a living person, I've been factual only, yet, the page is still flagged and my content was removed at one point. I feel this is an injusitice since these are FACTS, they are not baseless accusations.

Thank you.


 * Another editor has removed the (unref) banner. The deleted content is all due to one IP - since sections have been blanked without an appropriator reason in the edit summary, then they can be classed as vandalism for now, and the IP (User talk:99.188.244.204)has been warned with the "removal of content" warning. Looks like they might have some POV.  Ron h jones (Talk) 16:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Help
adminhelp

the wiki page for my City Councilmember, Marti Emerald in San Diego has been in constant dispute with people deleting my comments over and over. I finally went and specifically added at least 3 DIFFERENT citations for every sentence I wrote. "adminhelp" messaged me and said it was likely vandalism and they had the IP of the person and had warned them against doing that. Yes, my comments are AGAIN delted. This is grossly unfair and is violating not only free speech but well-documented information.
 * Hi Collegeandbillman. If you learn how page histories work, you'll be able to track who made what edit. Here, you would learn that every revert has been by anonymous IP addresses and mostly one. I have reverted that person's blanking again. They were warned before and I have now issued a final warning to them that if they blank content one more time they may be blocked from editing. If they do blank it again, just head over to Administrator intervention against vandalism and report. The trick is that we don't usually block until we've issued a few warnings. Meanwhile, as a lawyer, let me slip on my didactic hat and tell you that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution only protects speech from government censorship. You have no right to free speech on Wikipedia or at any other private organization. This is a common misconception. By the way, on talk pages such as this (but never in articles) please try to remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~ ) after your post (these can also be placed by clicking on the signature button Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically add you name and a timestamp to your post when you click save. Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi, this issue persists. My posted, documented information was removed and only 2 sentences of it left. When can this be resolved? I know you guys are volunteers, but any help you could give me would be greatly appreciated. This again is about my councilmember Marti Emerald in San Diego.
 * If you look at the edit history of the page, you'll see the edit summary (removed excessive citation (one cite to a reliable source is sufficient) and removed section about local group, cited to that group's website) left by the editor that removed the material. The way to resolve the issue is to open a discussion with the other editor on their talk page. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Username block
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of what username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you.  Horologium  (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I have blocked you under this username because it is the name of the local group you have been repeatedly trying to insert into the Marti Emerald article. Please do create a new account, but also keep in mind our policies regarding reliable sources and undue weight concerns, especially when dealing with biographies of living persons. A website which is arguably an attack site is not an acceptable source, and your apparent involvement with the site is a Conflict of Interest. We welcome contributors who want to improve articles, but Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and it should not be used to advance a vendetta against a politician with whom you have a grievance.  Horologium  (talk) 23:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * You're blocked because of your username and due to a perceived conflict of interest. You may request an unblock to rename at WP:Changing username/Simple by posting on this page, but bear in mind that a username change will not clear you of a conflict of interest. — Jeremy   v^_^v  Bori! 07:40, 24 February 2012 (UTC)