User talk:Colliric

Edit summaries
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Daniel Case (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Ok sure. It's mostly because I use my smartphone and edit too quickly. Colliric (talk) 03:49, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Can you kindly review gaslighting info and add it to wiki
https://emcee-senior.medium.com/a-conversation-becomes-an-argument-and-after-the-argument-the-victim-either-gets-emotionally-8edabd071c93 Dsm+sam (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

No I can't. Sorry, you simply need a better, more scholarly reference than that. A news article by a reputable mental health news source should suffice. Colliric (talk) 04:23, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:War in Afghanistan (2001–2021). ''"Yes this article is now misleading. The war is over and the Taliban won and everyone knows it. Hilarious to see Democratic editors attack this article." This is completely inappropriate. You've been here long enough that I assume you're familiar with WP:AGF and WP:NPA. Please don't do that again.'' Symmachus Auxiliarus (talk) 13:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Ok sure. Yes I got too passionate, I apologize! Colliric (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)