User talk:Colliric/Archive 1

February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Planet of the Apes (1968 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Jurassic Park has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Enigma  message Review 06:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Witchetty Grub collaboration
Witchetty grub is the new Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight. You supported its nomination, so please help to improve it in any way you can. Thanks - --Scott Davis Talk 13:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Page move of Cold Case
I requested that an administrator undo the move you made. This has already been done. The term Cold case is already found on the correct location, wiki articles are case sensitive. In case someone looking for the term ends up at Cold Case, there is a link to a disambiguation page on top which will redirect the user to whatever he is looking for. There is no reason to move the page of the tv show. If you had started a discussion about this, prior to moving it, that would have been made clear. Please start a discussion first about such page moves next time.--Fogeltje (talk) 08:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Blair Witch video games
"Original research" doesn't literally mean only doing research; one of us observing something which has not been addressed before in a reliable source constitutes OR too. If the reference is as obvious as you say, it ought not to be hard to find some sources for it. The part about the fanfic is problematic too; fanfic is generally not considered notable; there would need to be WP:RS for them too. I actually have those games, they came with the box set of the movies, but I don't have a system that would play them unfortunately, they sounded interesting. Шизомби (talk) 23:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Professional wrestling in Australia
Your edit on this page was fine, except for the reference to the unencyclopaedic "Graveyard Timeslot" which has been replaced. Also, please provide a reliable source for the claim that One HD has purchased video of the Hulkamania tour. If you can't it will have to be removed under WP:V as unverified. Thank you. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 01:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * When seeking reliable sources, stay away from sites that are tabloid in nature and print rumours and so forth. Please refer to this section for guidance. Wrestling Inc and Wrestling Truth are both tabloid sites. Thank you.  !! Just a Punk !!  10:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page The Departed has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ham tech  person  01:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Married... with Children, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Do not edit another users comments
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.. Specifically you flagged his comment as a personal insult when no such insult exists. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Your changes to Star Trek: The Motion Picture
I reverted your changes because their meaning was unclear. I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say, so I couldn't fix the wording. It sounded like you were saying the Director's Cut master was printed in 480-line SD, which didn't make sense. Please re-work the change and add it back, with a reliable source cited.

Thanks! &mdash; UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 11:20, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm not going to bother... It's what happened, but I guess it's not that important. Yes, The Director's Cut was only mastered in 480-Line SD, due to budgetary constraints(they were only allocated a small budget which mostly went on the new special effects), and the fact that it was specifically edited for a DVD release. It wasn't actually mastered to film(it was never printed to film), it was mastered to DVD. That's the reason the original theatrical cut was selected for Blu-Ray release instead and the director's cut wasn't even included on the Blu-Ray at all. http://www.therpf.com/f47/star-trek-motion-picture-directors-edition-blu-107942/ http://www.startrek.com/boards-topic/33343705/star-trek-the-motion-picture-director-s-cut-bluray

Too bad they're not sources that could go on the page.... Colliric (talk) 14:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Mokbel arrest.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Prometheus and Zeta 2 Reticuli Hi, thanks for dropping me a message about Prometheus. Unfortunately I disagree that Ridley Scott mentioning it in passing in an interview can be considered an official part of the story, so I've removed it again. Only information in the film itself should be considered official, or 'canon'. This principle is accepted when discussing any fictional universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomegranate (talk • contribs) 00:24, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

In which case, you should also delete Alien for good measure, because it's never mentioned speficially as the setting in that film either. It was loosely established though both interview comments made by Ridley and the Star Map(and distance to earth) that is shown in the scene with Lambert.... It was also thus extablished in Prometheus, with a simular scene where David is in the navigation room and sees the hologram showing the engineer's journey to earth. Not to mention the star map that we see on the isle of wright which shows the Reticuli star system. Colliric (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Please explain how the scene in Prometheus unambiguously show the star system to be Z2R? Is there a text label? Have you not heard the phrase 'two wrongs don't make a right?'. If it's not actually mentioned in Alien, then yes, it should be removed - but I'm not policing the whole article. I don't have Alien on DVD, but in this scene from the workprint version it is specifically spoken out loud: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/k36oSzI9QRcd4q1066K - perhaps you'd like to check the final version of the film to confirm whether that line was left in? Considering your mention of the "Isle of Wright" (no such place, didn't feature in Prometheus), I'm not sure you can rely on your own memory pomegranate (talk) 20:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

The line wasn't in the final version, as Scott thought it gave away too much. The view screen however isn't just random anyway, because it shows the Reticulum constellation.

I'm not scottish.... so I mispelled "Wight". But the star map shown in the cave paintings is actually closely aligned to Ms Marjorie Fish's interpretation of Betty Hill(the famous UFO abductee)'s star map of the Zeta Reticuli system and the surrounding stars(the constellation is shown by the strong red lines): http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Zeta_Reticuli_Images/Betty_Hill_Star_Map.gif and the prometheus one: http://www.geeksofdoom.com/GoD/img/2012/06/12-06-12-prometheus_cave_painting.jpg ... the same.

"The pictogram shows humans worshiping giant beings pointing to the stars. The crude constellation depicted in these ideograms is a perfect match for the Zeta Reticula system, some 39 light-years (220 trillion miles) away." http://www.geeksofdoom.com/2012/06/14/prometheus-to-create-you-must-destroy/

and here's some infomation about the constellation and the Hill star map taken from one of those "Ufo believer" sites: http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Constellation__Reticulum.htm http://www.gravitywarpdrive.com/Zeta_Reticuli_Incident.htm

I'm not trying to tell you "UFOs are real, etc" I'm just providing you with some interesting information that Scott himself was aware of when setting Alien there(and also Prometheus!). He was aware it was the place UFO believers often cite as where their Abductor's come from and he obviously finds it interesting because of that! Colliric (talk) 11:44, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Mokbel arrest.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

I have fixed the problem based on the same reason of a simular mug-shot photograph found in the Keith Faure page. Basically this is the most well known image of the REAL(see my previous edits to the page, I got rid of the edits of someone posting fake images to the page) Tony Mokbel due to the fact it's his mugshot AND he was arrested and photographed with a cheap wig on. And most images of him are copyrighted, so may as well use the most famous/funniest/recognisable. Even if changed, the image is likely to reappear on the page later on, due to it's overwelming popularity. Colliric (talk) 06:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mokbel arrest.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry dude, but a Vandal actually removed the original article link. I have since restored it. The Article it appears in is Tony Mokbel, and as you can see a vandal edited the photo's page so it was misspelled as "Mobel"(breaking the link), and then proceedede to put their silly images of themselves into the Mokbel article. I have warned them not to do it again and reported the vandalism. Colliric (talk) 14:07, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mokbel arrest.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

see my note above.... I need someone to lock the article so that it can only be edited by autoconfirmed users as it is being altered by a serial vandal. Colliric (talk) 05:03, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Master (2012 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 15:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mokbel arrest.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mokbel arrest.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:51, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Underbelly: Squizzy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carl Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Although reverting vandalism is an exemption to WP:3RR, the definition of vandalism might be a little different than you're trying to use (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:56, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree it was possibly not "delibrate" vandalism under Wikipedia's specific definition, but it was certainly Vandalism(delibrate or not). Perhaps I should have put a page-protection request with my second reversion as well as an official warning on his talk page, rather than only reverting it and proceeding to react strongly and "tell him off". My Mistake, sorry. Will do that if it happens a third time. I also hope the Article is not altered misguidingly in the interim by another user. Colliric (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You will note that the other editor has also been blocked for edit-warring. We have content dispute resolution processes for a reason (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Amok Time, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * It is also stated in the page of the Futurama episode. There is no need for a reference here, it is on the page of the Futurama episode. The episode acts as it's own reference since it is a primary source since it uses most of the plot(and the famous fight music) of Amok Time. Colliric (talk) 15:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources as discussed at WP:CIRCULAR. If the episode page does not include a citation then it should be removed there. If it does provide a citation then the citation should be copied to Amok Time. In any event, no matter how closely we think an episode of tv resembles another, it is still synthesis to say that without a reliable source. Cheers. Doniago (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I will do that. ThanksColliric (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Sikhs Vs Sheikhs
Please, please learn the diffrence between Sikh's and Sheikh's. Your comments on the Star Trek page are high offensive, although I have now realised you didn't mean to be. Please learn difference between ethnic minorities before commenting. Here is an extract of my comments from that page. S H 14:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC) no offence but you have no idea what you are talking about. North-West Indians are light brown skinned. They have originated from groups like Jat, Scythians from the Black Sea area. They tend to be tall. An extreme variation is the wrestler The Great Khali. There is no stirring by Muslims (please stop confusing Muslims with Sikhs). He is not a Sheik but a SIKH. Motalban looks exactly like North-West Indians or Punjabi's. It's this sort of ignorance that has led to the Whitewashing of the Star Trek Universe. S H 14:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * My dear fellow editor. [This http://americanturban.com/] is not a blog, but a legitimate website. It offer news, as well as advice to the Sikh community. It is the outlet for Sikh's to the press in America. Take a look for yourself. Thanks S H 16:01, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry If I wasn't clear, but the reference you used in the previous paragraph was the one I was talking about. That is a blog. Secondly "americanturban" is a biased source. WP:Bias and WP:NEWSBLOG Colliric (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The L. Ron Hubbard Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bridge Publications (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The Twilight Zone (franchise)
In regards to my recent edits to The Twilight Zone (franchise), sorry about that Star Trek typo. As you suggested, this was unintentional. As for the rest of the edits, I support what I did 100 percent. That article is not primarily about the original show. The original show already has its own article (The Twilight Zone (1959 TV series)). Instead, the article at hand is about the entire franchise that includes all media associated with the Twilight Zone brand. Examples of this include: The Muppets, The Simpsons (franchise), and Star Wars. I think my edit was a starting block towards having The Twilight Zone (franchise) represent what it should. In any case, this article is lacking. --TFunk (talk) 00:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

ANI Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mattel. Thank you. —Guy Macon (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Dr Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Statue in Melbourne's Chinatown.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dr Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Statue in Melbourne's Chinatown.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telltale (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fuck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuckwit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Fat Tony & Co.
Hi, Fat Tony & Co. is not part of the Underbelly series, see: TBSfan1223 (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Incorrect, the series has been planned as the next installment, and possibly the last installment, of Underbelly. The production has been in planning since Razor was made, which is how I know this. They began working on "The Underbelly Sequel" as it was originally nicknamed at the time (due to it's direct plot links to the first season, and apart from Badness, is the only one set after it). That was simply not made clear in the article, which seemed to consider it a fresh proposal(which is NOT the case). Probably the Author just took it for granted people would know it's Underbelly. The series is made by the same production company, for the same channel, in the same style and for presumably the same timeslot... Ergo it IS UNDERBELLY. Also Vince Colosimo's statement would only make sense in this particular context. Colliric (talk) 16:21, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570695220 your edit] to Jurassic Park (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * would help him finally complete the first three episodes of the Star Wars saga as he saw it. Shone, Tom. [http://books.google.com/books?id=_HMOHsjIb5cC&pg=PA218&lpg=PA218 ''Blockbuster:

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * A Streetcar Named Desire (play) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vanity Fair


 * Blue Jasmine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The L. Ron Hubbard Series
Hello, Colliric,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether The L. Ron Hubbard Series should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/The L. Ron Hubbard Series.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Green Cardamom (talk) 02:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Butter-Menthol


The article Butter-Menthol has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unable to locate substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Perma-stub.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sum mer PhD (talk) 15:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Dirty Harry
Hi. I reverted your edit to Dirty Harry, because it was not accompanied by any citations of reliable, verifiable sources explicitly, as is required by the Verifiability and Original Research policies. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Pretty stupid thing to do mate.... I'll go aheard and revert it back with the link, but you could have looked it up yourself. https://itunes.apple.com/us/movie/dirty-harry/id530783541

Colliric (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * No, it's not a stupid thing to do, it's the policy-compliant thing to do, which you should know by now. It's not my job to look up sources for material you want to add to articles, it's yours. My Wikipedia workload is already large enough as it is.


 * But since we're talking about doing stupid things, you spelled its as it's. Again.


 * And the source you cited makes no mention of the film's sequels, or "high definition". Nightscream (talk) 01:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes it does. The rest of the films in the series are listed under "Viewers Also Bought", and if you click through to the actual store link and open it in Itunes itself, it lists as "HD 1080p".Colliric (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Why do you keep writing the word its as "it's"? That's the third time you did this, after I pointed it out to you twice.


 * And high definition is not a proper noun. Neither is the word digital.


 * The phrase "HD 1080p" does not appear anywhere on the iTunes page. A good source is one that actually contains the information in question, and doesn't require clicking on other links. I've added one that does. Nightscream (talk) 04:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Please do not add your own personal viewpoints or analyses to Wikipedia articles, as you did with these edits to the Dirty Harry (character) article. As I mentioned to you above, Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of inline citations. If you want to add the assertion of which films were influenced by Dirty Harry, then please include citations reliable, secondary sources to support this. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Lol, so we have to put up with the shitty 1995 film being mentioned as inspired by it, but how dare the comicbook be mentioned, and the far better 2012 film is 100% not allowed at all! Actually despite how idiotic it is, policy wise I guess you are "correct"... Why don't you just rewrite it yourself? Perhaps extract the 1995 bomb, put a new paragraph about how the "Judge Dredd" property and film adaptations are inspired by Dirty Harry? You obviously won't be happy with any edit I make to correct that problem(of the WORST judge Dredd thing being the only one mentioned), so may as well write it up yourself! Colliric (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I see now you've deleted the whole section. Which I actually agree with. Sorry, I thought you'd just undone my edit when I saw your comment on my talk page. I agree with deleting this, if it's re-added by someone else, it needs to be a reference to the wider Judge Dredd franchise/character. So I'd watch out for that. Colliric (talk) 06:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * The article is on my Watchlist, so I should see all edits made to it.


 * But feel free to re-add the material I removed that you can find sources for. Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 04:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nanotechnology in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skynet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Wikipedical (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=641354327 your edit] to Star Wars sources and analogues may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:36, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * * tincludes many elements derived from the 1936 Universal serial [[Flash Gordon (serial)|Flash

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Collingwood Football Club
 * added a link pointing to Mark Williams


 * The Club (1980 film)
 * added a link pointing to Motif

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands (Wii), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flashback. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Pursuit Special (Mad Max Movies)
G'Day mate. Regarding the black interceptor, I've added a new section for the upcoming Mad Max 4 Movie with a cite. It contains as much info as is possible for now. Do you think the flag for "This article is outdated. (December 2014)" can be removed now ? I also updated the Mad Max 1 section and I'll try and stay on top of Fury Road events as time goes on after I get the Mad Max 2 section sorted out when I find some good references. Ironmungy (talk) 16:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2017
Hello, I'm Jd02022092. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 06:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Blade Runner
It really isn't necessary to include long, rambling spoilers of key plot points in your edits summary. Please be more conscious of such things in the future. ---  The Old Jacobite  The '45  12:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Truth be told I probably should have waited a few days so people could see the sequel themselves and see that it is so. But yeah, it answered the question in a sensational manner while simultaneously raising others. Personally I loved the sequel, it was amazing. Colliric (talk) 12:26, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Stargate (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Anti-Semitic edit summaries
Your edit summary on Rabbi was highly inappropriate and anti-Semitic. Please cease this sort of behavior; consider this your only warning from me. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  02:55, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Dad.... Warning noted. Colliric (talk) 07:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Lol. Dude seriously it was one edit man. Honestly. Colliric (talk) 07:14, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * User:El cid, el campeador, I meant to comment here last month. Seriously, it was not only one edit. Honestly. here your edit summary was similar, "Obvious that a Jewish person edited this incorrectly to make it not sound Jewish." Three strikes and you're likely to be out. Doug Weller  talk 11:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the surprise threatening language mate. Mountain out of a molehill. At least you have inspired me to finally Archive all the old threads here so this one gets archived too. Colliric (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alien ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Invasion_of_the_Body_Snatchers_%281978_film%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Invasion_of_the_Body_Snatchers_%281978_film%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

The "Hebrew Bible" is the Tanakh
It's not another name for the Old Testament. As for the other edit I reverted, if it's in one of the sources please discuss it on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 12:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)


 * It is the same textual content(specifically as the Protestant version) and Messianic Jews in the majority call it simply the Tanakh in Hebrew, not the Old Testament. My point is it is essentially repetitive because of the near identical nature of the texts. Messianic Bibles in Hebrew oft call the OT the Tanakh, or flat out just have the Tanakh ordering of the books. Colliric (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Testament, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 12:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have the time to do that specifically(Too lazy lol!), but thank you for reverting it anyway. I actually think I changed it too much too quick in that edit. Probably should only have put the Jewish Christians related comment and found a source(after all there's heaps of them as you yourself probably already know, but I was being lazy). Colliric (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree, you should never substitute your own judgment for the judgment of WP:RS. This holds for both additions and removals. Especially in Bible scholarship, wherein WP:SCHOLARSHIP is mostly counter-intuitive or theologically unorthodox. Tgeorgescu (talk) 09:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's fine I was just being too stupidly lazy to find a proper source. As I'm sure you're aware there are many possible sources for what I put as it is basically general knowledge fact. I am happy he changed it back though. It was a very badly written edit anyway on my part. Colliric (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Messianic Judaism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reenactment ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Messianic_Judaism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Messianic_Judaism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Darke, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dreamworld ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jack_Darke check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jack_Darke?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scooby-Doo Spooky Coaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shaggy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Scooby-Doo_Spooky_Coaster check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Scooby-Doo_Spooky_Coaster?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Sanhedrin Trials
Okay, first off I wasn't even thinking about the Talmud inscriptions, I was reading about the article in Pontious Pilate's court article on Wikipedia, and was I have never read the Babylonian Talmud version, I have read earlier Christian versions of the Bible, instead of the KJV, such as the Tyndale Bible, and please, stop judging me of something I had never thought of from another scripture from another culture!--Funkquake (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Koji Kondo - 2011- Ocarina of Time 3DS Soundtrack Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Koji Kondo - 2011- Ocarina of Time 3DS Soundtrack Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Shekinah Editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles are given representation in proportion to their prominence.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:41, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Point noted, ok I will leave it on the discussion on the Talk page there. Please don't make my talk page messy, please remember to put a new section on it. I didn't know what you were on about at first. Took me ten minutes to figure it out. I do not appreciate people making my talk page messy.Colliric (talk) 04:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It was both edits regarding Rotten Tomatoes and Shekinah.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:01, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes I saw that. I accept your criticism, as I didn't put a proper source on it.Colliric (talk) 05:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Return of the Jedi, you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok sure mate. Sorry yes it was a bit too much personal opinion. Colliric (talk) 05:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, I'm AussieWikiDan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Master System, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Godfather 3
Hi. Thanks for adding reviews about the recut film, but it already had a section below. I've now moved that section up because I can see how it can be easily lost. Your edits were lost. Please reintegrate any of your edits to the existing paragraph. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

It's ok, I undid it myself. Colliric (talk) 17:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)