User talk:Colnet1

June 2019
Your recent editing history at Álvaro Uribe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Álvaro Uribe, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You repeated the removal of content after receiving the above warning against further 'edit warring' You will now be reported for breaching this policy warning and your account may be blocked from editing. As advised, you should have discussed your reasons for wanting to remove content on the article's talk page first. '' Nick Moyes (talk) 00:23, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't really know how to reply back to you. But here it's. The edits on the Alvaro Uribe site by cuantados are incorrect, politically-oriented and just pure fallacies by a leftist. Alvaro Uribe Velez has been a beacon of democracy in Colombia and his enemies used attacks like this one to destroyed his image and legacy. Alvaro Uribe Velez worked very hard to reduced the production and sending of cocaine to the United States and the rest of the world. This has been the reason for the biggest attacks he has received by the leftist narco-Traficant's in Colombia. During Uribe's presidency, the number of hectares of coca leaf was reduced from 167000 ha to 34000 ha and going down as of August 7, 2010. Once the new government took over that policy, which was basically no policy and support to narcoterrorist groups, the number of hectares when from 37000 ha to 265000 ha and more than 3000 metric tons of processed cocaine going to the streets of the United States and Europe. As I assumed that you, as well as me, are American, we are to support this kind of efforts and care about our people, bothers, friends, sisters, etc, and call this kind of things the way they are correctly named: trafficking cocaine to destroy America. My posting is correct and truthful. they are impartial and based on well-known facts about Alvaro Uribe. Please, revert to my edits and lock the editing on this article, for the interest of truth and justice.

Sorry, I forgot the last thing. since are now responsible for this post and the inaccurate information it's trying to publish, I'll be contacting the legal representative of the Centro Democratico and their lawyers in Miami, so we can get this matter under the right perspective! Lies and defamation of character are still a legal figure in the United States... Thanks.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. N.J.A.  &#124; talk  02:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)