User talk:Colonies Chris/Archive/2011/Dec

Ancient history
Hi, I thought you might be amused to discover that an error you made on December 5, 2009 – changing a Benvenuto Cellini link to Benvenuto Cellini (opera) – has finally been discovered and corrected. Other than that, keep up the good work! M AN d ARAX •  XAЯA b ИA M  22:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Vera Bate Lombardi
Hello You put a tag on this article for neutrality a couple of days ago, but didn't leave any explanation. So I've deleted it. If you feel the article lacks neutrality in some way, and wish to re-instate the tag, perhaps you'd explain what the problem is on the talk page, or somewhere. Thanks, Swanny18 (talk) 17:39, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed your comment, here: It's a fair point. I don't know that much about Chanel; I was mainly interested in sorting out the POV over the legitimacy allegation. Did you want to put the tag back? Or take a crack at neutralizing it yourself? Or maybe we should bat it back to the original editor... Swanny18 (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I appreciate
your correction of my misspelling of the word "Dimensions" recently. I checked my desktop bib;biography - where I cut and paste most of my references from and I had it correct there, Which makes me feel even better. Life is supposed to be interesting. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:37, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Dashes in DOIs
Chris, you cannot change dashes in DOIs to endashes in edits such as this one as it will break the DOI links. Thanks Rjwilmsi  12:01, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

MOSLINK
Hi Chris, long time no speak. MOSLINK is the subject of a few issues at the moment in which you've been previously involved. I mentioned you on Arthur Rubin's talk page too. Just a courtesy note. Tony  (talk)  08:48, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Arfoud, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page The Mummy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Buildings destroyed during World War II in the United Kingdom
See my proposal to rename Category:Buildings destroyed during World War II in the United Kingdom to Category:Buildings and structures in the United Kingdom destroyed during World War II Hugo999 (talk) 02:57, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Opel Insignia OPC
A tag has been placed on Opel Insignia OPC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. T83388 (talk) 14:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Opel Astra OPC
A tag has been placed on Opel Astra OPC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. T83388 (talk) 14:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)