User talk:Colonies Chris/Archive/2020/Apr

Speedy deletion nomination of The Trial of Donald Duck


A tag has been placed on The Trial of Donald Duck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040902/plotsummary. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi QueerEcofeminist. I created that page a long time ago as a redirect, but it's Violeta1290 that added all of the copyvio content, so it might be worth dropping them this note. Especially as they seem to have instantly recreated the same page. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Rather than being deleted, the original redirect should be reinstated. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vogogna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visconti Castle ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Vogogna check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Vogogna?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mark Charles Merenda


The article Mark Charles Merenda has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Might well be notable, but it's difficult to tell without a single in-depth third party source."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2020 (UTC)