User talk:ColoradoAssembly

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and declined; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please do not recreate this article, as it was composed mainly of copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Jarkeld (talk) 00:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Representative Nancy Todd
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Representative Nancy Todd, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nancytodd.org/about.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Representative Angela Williams
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Representative Angela Williams, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.angela4colo.com/index.php/about-angela.html. As a copyright violation, Representative Angela Williams appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Representative Angela Williams has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Representative Angela Williams and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Representative Angela Williams with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Representative Angela Williams.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 22:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Rep. Nancy Todd
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rep. Nancy Todd, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.nancytodd.org/about.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Deletion
I have had to delete these pages, because much of the article text was taken from a copyrighted website nearly word for word. According to that site's own copyright notice, this is not allowed. If you are the site owner and would like to grant access to Wikipedia to use the text, you can email us (see Contact us/Permit) from an official address, but note that once text appears on Wikipedia anywhere, it becomes free for use anywhere else and we cannot be held liable for anything that someone outside Wikipedia does with it. Even if this is okayed by the site author, the text as it stands currently would still be plagiarism and need to be reworded in order to be able to be used on Wikipedia. Please do not re-create these articles without fixing these problems. Thank you for reading this message.  ♣ Soap  ♣  20:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)