User talk:Columbiacollege.prm

June 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Grey Wanderer | Talk 17:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * that said said, if you think you can contribute with regards to our rules would you be interested in:

Grey Wanderer | Talk 17:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
I responded on my talk page to your comment. There I've given you directions on how to properly go about demonstrating permission for the content you introduced on the Columbia College (Columbia, Missouri) page. In general because of your COI you will probably face more scrutiny than the average editor while you edit Columbia College related articles. But that shouldn't worry you too much. Just in case though here are somethings to think about:


 * Make sure you are familiar with Wikipedia's polices, a good summary is here
 * Its a good idea to always be logged in, for good or bad, editors tend to treat people signed in with less suspicion.
 * Sign your talk page post with 4 tildas ( ~
 * Be open to endless criticism of your work (it will make it better in the long run)

Other than that, I will warn you that some of the material you added on Columbia College will need to be edited for neutrality (prose for an encyclopedia is significantly different), and the entire article needs to be sourced with inline citations. I'm always available if you have other questions or need help doing something. Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Revision to Aurora, CO
I posted a reply to your message on my talk page, but just in case, I'll copy and paste my reply here as well. Feel free to reply back on your talk page, if you want.

Those schools are based in Aurora, Colorado, which is not the case for Columbia College. I know there's a related campus in Aurora, but as I said, Columbia College isn't actually based in Aurora. Virtually every single "Education" section (at least from what I've seen), in the various city pages on Wikipedia, only include schools that are actually based in that city. I'm assuming that the reasoning behind this is that there are many schools that have related campuses located in cities across the country and including them all would just be a rather tedious and unnecessary task. If you really feel that Columbia College should be included, then I suggest discussing that in the WikiProject Cities discussion page to see what others think, too. As I said, though, judging from the content of the "Education" sections in all of the city articles I've seen, only schools that are actually based in those cities are included. -- Luke4545 (talk) 16:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)